Jump to content

pandaman

Members
  • Posts

    2,853
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

2,756 Excellent

Profile Information

  • About me
    Sr. Spacecraft Engineer
  • Location
    Nottingham UK

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I built a plane with the lander can as a 'cockpit' and flew there. Added chutes to avoid needing a flat runway area. Not at all pretty, but functional, and a lot easier than trying to hit it from orbit, and no reentry heat to worry about either.
  2. I'm not against adding things to the Kerbol system, but I don't think it would add a lot gameplay wise overall. Maybe a Pluto - Charon type binary system as a 'practice ground' for Rask and Rusk would work. Asteroids and comets would be good, of course, and maybe a couple of new small rocky moons. But I'd rather they flesh out the existing bodies with more places of interest than just adding more planets.
  3. Try using the square bracket keys to cycle through controlling nearby vessels. (At least I think it's square brackets, not able to try it and verify atm)
  4. I'm of the opinion that LS is too critical an aspect of space flight to just ignore. I think it should be represented in some way. Probably two 'resources' - Air and Food (which includes water), or perhaps have water as a specific third resource. But with toggleable effects - None, Death, and Hibernation as the default.
  5. These are essential tools IMO. Not so bad at the moment given the overall state of the game, but once For Science drops not having a stock implementation fir these is a serious oversight.
  6. I think, rather than all anomalies/discoverables detectable by orbital scanning it could be nice to have a mixture. Some could emit detectable 'signals' such as heat, radiation, gravity spike's etc, that orbital scanners might pick up. Others would just be big enough to be visible from low orbit or if you get within a few km. And some maybe give off weak signals that may help you 'home in' if you are close enough.
  7. No doubt there will be a mod for it before too long. It doesn't feel as as it would fit in the 'standard' stock game/universe but it is something I'd like to see as an official DLC 'alternative' option.
  8. Yeah 'Cadet Orientation' is very confusing. How about... Cadet Mode (for first time players)
  9. Hmm . That could work as a toggled option. But the marker couldn't be too elaborate or the graphics performance would take a serious hit.
  10. Optional original UI? No, not a good idea. whatever one's feelings about the respective styles are, two completely different arrangements to maintain is just plain silly. Making the 'new' UI more customisable is much more practical. Colour options and individually scalable entites (both good for visually impaired) and some facility for repositioning some items etc.
  11. Do I 'want' it to? Yes. Do I expect it to? No. Trailers like that are works of cinema created as adverts, not gameplay (unles it explicitly says so). It's simply unrealistic to expect it.
  12. No idea how viable this is, but one 'possible' solution could be to have 'autoburn' related to pilot skill. Slight randomisation of accuracy at all levels, but much narrower margin for error and more accuracy with more skilled pilots.
×
×
  • Create New...