Jump to content

mikegarrison

Members
  • Posts

    4,689
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

5,526 Excellent

3 Followers

About mikegarrison

Profile Information

  • About me
    IRL Aero Engineer

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealab_2021 (By the way, when I was a kid, Sealab 2020 seemed set in the remote future. So was Space 1999 and 2001 A Space Odyssey.)
  2. That was actually an important design consideration for the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_Constellation, which was designed with a triple stabilizer because they wanted to make sure it would fit into the hangers of the primary customer. A single vertical stabilizer would have been too tall and would have required new hangers. Not if you lose an engine.
  3. Vertical stabilizers and rudders are actually sized by engine-out conditions (on most multi-engine airplanes). The asymmetric thrust is a bigger deal than basic yaw stability and control. Anyway, as @sevenperforce just said, it's mainly about lever arms. The farther away from the aerodynamic center for yaw, the smaller you can make them and still get the same control. Vertical stabilizers don't usually have a significant amount of steady-state lift-induced drag (because ideally they are trimmed to a zero-lift condition), but they still have form drag and friction drag and wave drag. So the smaller the better, usually.
  4. Already borrowed. I first saw it in one of Douglas Adams's Hitchhiker Guide books. Although, IIRC, it was in a guide entry about a triple-breasted sex worker. Or maybe that was "the best bang since the big one"? I would have to dig up my paperback copy of the novel to be sure.
  5. I think that's a very old patch. I remember trying it before the pandemic.
  6. I would argue that the first "footprints" on Mars have already been made by robots.
  7. Besides, after a while everybody goes crazy and starts gene-splicing and killing each other with electricity that shoots from their hands. Just ask Andrew Ryan.
  8. What they really need is to just put a ladder on the side of the Dragon and have one of the astronauts climb it while bumping their head on something. That's an infallible drive system that doesn't even require any fuel.
  9. It's nearly the same problem that the Starliner had. That dinitrogen tetroxide is nasty stuff and corrosive AF. It doesn't play nicely with valves. SpaceX eventually got rid of the check valves by putting in burst panels, IIRC, so that really I think they have no way of shutting off the SuperDracos, much less restarting them. They are kind of one-time-use items.
  10. https://www.theonion.com/nasa-panics-after-asteroid-fires-back-1849587289
  11. It's not viable, for lots and lots of reasons. Just for example: on a commercial airplane you have to demonstrate (with a real evacuation using real people) that you can evacuate the entire airplane in 90 seconds -- in the dark, with half the exits blocked off (and they won't tell you which half until the 90 seconds starts). I've never seen anyone from SpaceX ever address anything like this.
  12. That's understandable. I kind of expect a fair number of explosions, actually, although I guess we'll see what happens.
  13. Lunar Starship is not designed for Earth re-entry.
×
×
  • Create New...