Recommended Posts

So umm, a couple months ago I was lazy and used mods like Kerbal Engineer for data readings. Soon I became interested in collecting those data values myself. Soooo I headed to the cheat sheat in the KSP wiki. I learn’t ‘The Rocket Equation’ quite easily and then moved onto TWR. But whenever I plugged in the numbers it would turn out wrong. So I spent hourrs
trying to solve this problem with no results. Here is the formula off the wiki:

eb56e634c4b30235deeaf0a0708fbfcf.png

Where 

Ft is thrust 

m is mass

g is the gravitational acceleration 

I’m also using a scientific calculator for these calculations. Any help would be appreciated whatsoever!!!:)

Edited by Shadow Wolf56

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Shadow Wolf56 said:

So umm, a couple months ago I was lazy and used mods like Kerbal Engineer for data readings. Soon I became interested in collecting those data values myself. Soooo I headed to the cheat sheat in the KSP wiki. I learn’t ‘The Rocket Equation’ quite easily and then moved onto TWR. But whenever I plugged in the numbers it would turn out wrong. So I spent hourrs
trying to solve this problem with no results. Here is the formula off the wiki:

eb56e634c4b30235deeaf0a0708fbfcf.png

Where 

Ft is thrust 

m is mass

g is the gravitational constant

I’m also using a scientific calculator for these calculations. Any help would be appreciated whatsoever!!!:)

Can you give an example of a calculation that has gone wrong? 

Seems wierd that you'd get stuck on TWR if you can manage the rocket equation.

 

EDIT: wait, g is the acceleration due to gravity at sea level (i.e 9.81 ms^-2), are you using that or the gravitational constant, G?

Edited by Steel

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah i put 9.81 into it @Steel @Lukaszenko

Here is what my calculator calculates

6*200(this is for Kerbal X)+1500/130.94*9.81= 1312.3797

???

I couldn’t get pics because I forgot how to:confused:

 

Edited by Shadow Wolf56

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, Shadow Wolf56 said:

Yeah i put 9.81 into it @Steel @Lukaszenko

Here is what my calculator calculates

6*200(this is for Kerbal X)+1500/130.94*9.81= 1312.3797

???

I couldn’t get pics because I forgot how to:confused:

 

Make sure you're putting brackets around everything to make sure the operations are being carried out in the correct order.

(6*200+1500)/(130.94*9.81) = 2.10

 

The way you have input it, the calculator is doing

(6*200) + (1500/130.94) *9.81 = 1312...

because of BIDMAS (or sometimes PIDMAS).

Edited by Steel

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tip: instead of doing thrust / (mass * gravity), you can do thrust / mass / gravity. It's easier to memorize, easier to enter into a calculator, and gives the exact same result.

But you still need to correctly set brackets around the addition of individual thrust values, just as @Steel said. IMHO, just do the addition first and then use the result from that as a single number for thrust. Troubleshooting math problems is all about reducing unnecessary complexity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I know what happened. Your calculator cares about order of operations. Make sure to put brackets where required.

Your calculator is doing is this: (6*200)+(1500/130.94*9.81), which equals 1312.37971...

What you really want to do is this: (6*200+1500)/(130.94*9.81), which equals 2.10195.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Steel said:

Make sure you're putting brackets around everything to make sure the operations are being carried out in the correct order.

(6*200+1500)/(130.94*9.81) = 2.10

 

The way you have input it, the calculator is doing

(6*200) + (1500/130.94) *9.81 = 1312...

because of BIDMAS (or sometimes PIDMAS).

Ok, this might work!!!

EDIT: Thanks guys, my calculator now is doing the right thing!

 

 

 

 

Edited by Shadow Wolf56

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Shadow Wolf56 said:

Ok, this might work!!!

EDIT: Thanks guys, my calculator now is doing the right thing!

 

 

 

 

What I've found over the years is that it's good practice, whenever you do a fraction, to put the top and bottom halves into their own brackets, even if it's not necessary. Avoids a lot of annoying mistakes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.