Jump to content

Thunderbird

Members
  • Posts

    343
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Thunderbird

  1. as long as its within a reasonable range of balance with vast majority of the mods, im happy =P (aka the .3 numbers... wasnt really balanced but close enough) also,can the instabilities be a result of the collision model with the individual parts themselves?
  2. please remember to not go straight up and then get lateral velocity,but go in a curve personally i start to angle my rocket slowly while on the edge of lower atmosphere, that way i already get some lateral velocity while still ascending
  3. Intrepid II is so ridiculously easy to fly to the moon that it aint even funny... .... well,it is actually =P i admit i didnt really try the other 2 much, but Intrepid II is my flight trainer and i frequently use it to teach other people to fly if they show interest in the game... if you cant do it, chances are youre just doing it wrong... sorry
  4. i mostly agree, most of the part packs have their values derived from stock,atleast approximately, and id prefer if it would stay that way so they are compatible, within boundaries ofcourse if there is something unbalanced though,that doesnt mean keep it that way... balance the hell out of it, just keep it within the compatibility range either way,keep up the good work Tiberion, :thumbup:
  5. so... now i can kill my kerbals without exploding the rocket? AWESOME!
  6. someone else uploaded it intact,do a forum search
  7. i thought thats what i tried yesterday and i couldnt get it to work.... could i bother you for some pictures on that? =P
  8. i will once i figure out how the hell do you work this thing =P looks nicer though,the attachment points allow greater flexibility
  9. this is quite possibly the most awesome parachute ever, im using it since day1 of my Kerbalization =P
  10. are you going to run some optimizations on the pack later? the pack is big and loads noticeably longer than everything else... even using the lowres version... its not that big of a deal, but it might increase the overall performace
  11. just want to say, i REALLY appreciate the reduction of gimbals those things are really driving me crazy and while useful at times, they tend to bananize my rocket quite often... thanks for the great work,this pack is cool =P
  12. try putting it on something else.... it works fine,ive tested it lots =P
  13. HAHAHAHAHA =P best laugh of the day, and thats when i was teaching coleagues KSP at work today =P
  14. now download NovaPunch parts pack and try again =P
  15. borked pics,take screenies in fullscreen mode or it breaks
  16. very nice =P lately im finding out that the gantry is way too bulky for me, Kebylon might do nicely
  17. I like marbles! not exactly the first landing, but the first one with worthwhile view
  18. if theres not,i will be stuck to using the demo version until there is.... :\'(
  19. i saw that Killer,i just thought id try it anyway.... and when i saw what the HELL i built again i thought you might want to know =P either way,i suspect much Kerbalness to come from Blaze....
  20. well,closest to the VTOL i want that i was able to come is this: i think i was expanding on a bug or something because i cant,for the love of god, reproduce it... but i was stacking stuff on itself first i somehow placed it in a weird agle using the symmetry bug,then i kept copying the brackets with engines and stacking them on top until i could somehow place the engine as i wanted.... problem is,now that i have it... i cant recreate it to do the other one =P hey,im not even sure if you intended that to be possible... but... halp pl0x? =P edit: and heres how you can do it.... i think... http://i.imgur.com/hKwxH.jpg
  21. Silisko edition might be cool,but it alone doesnt really allow the degree of variety that im looking for... not to mention that SundayPunch was also balanced now that Tiberion took over =P
×
×
  • Create New...