![](https://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/uploads/set_resources_17/84c1e40ea0e759e3f1505eb1788ddf3c_pattern.png)
![](https://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/uploads/set_resources_17/84c1e40ea0e759e3f1505eb1788ddf3c_default_photo.png)
TronX33
-
Posts
199 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Developer Articles
KSP2 Release Notes
Posts posted by TronX33
-
-
So, I made this for this request (http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/101827-Request-Looking-for-a-B-52), and I thought, why not publish it?
So I did.
Coming in at only 273 parts (very few compared to the other replica, at 800, and right in line with most other replicas), it has a junior docking port above the cockpit, allowing for mid-air refueling, 4 "nuclear" bombs (they may partially explode by hitting parts of the plane) and a rear gunner seat, with antenna "guns".
Warning: Do not stage past the first stage. It will destroy the craft!
Javascript is disabled. View full album
-
How does one use the Oerilngton (I don't know how to spell it)millenium cannon? By testing it, it seems to function like a flak cannon from WW2. Does the AI automatically adjust the explosion distance?
-
Are you sure you were controlling from the cupola module? It works fine for me.
If you click on other views, however, that screws the controls up, so you have to click back to the main cupola module to keep the "control from here" position straight.
Thanks for the reply, but if you look at your image, you are in the cupola view. The tiny control-ball thingy is telling you that the cupola is pointing about 5 degrees to the left from prograde. That is what I am experiencing, with no movement of the prograde marker closer the where the cupola is pointing.. Any, it's an easy enough fix, i just translated and rotated the cupola in the SPH.
-
I don't know if any of you guys know, but holding shift plus the arrow keys makes it move, as if in a FPS I guess?. Holding Shift plus scrolling make the camera go up.
-
Oh...... it looks like the Big-S winglets are missing it's control surfaces. I know that a smaller winglet is directly behind it, but at the outside edge you cannot see a single trace of control surfaces.
-
When are we gonna get that sci-fi weapons pack, you know, like that bomb Nexter's lab played with?
-
The smoke is that of an SRB.
-
Is it just me, or is the cupola lopsided, so that it's off from prograde?
-
How to imbed an Imgur album
Step 1: take note of the album code. In your case, it would be Q2w5N#6 (ignore the #6, its a anchor tag or something, but you can't embed it with that)
Step 2: Go to your post, click edit
Step 3: At where you wish to put the album, type in
Javascript is disabled. View full album
Just don't do it with spaces. Remember, do not put the #6, only put Q 2w5N (ignore that space as well. -
Presenting, The KX (Kerbal Experimental)-05 (Fifth in my weird, wacky, and cool looking ships, but others sucked) Forward Swept Testbed.
It only has 1 jet fuel tank per engine, so don't expect to go far. It's mainly designed for flying around the KSC. Sporting 2 Whiplash Turbo-Ramjet engines, you will have all the speed you need. It's not the most maneuverable, but its still good, and it's impossible to pitch too hard! Prograde is always, at most, 5 degrees behind your directional marker. Any feedback would be appreciated!
Javascript is disabled. View full album
DL:https://www.dropbox.com/s/pu32sekesdg0lxz/X-05.craft?dl=0
-
5/10 What is that, an engine for ants?
-
For some random reason, I named my self theengineer, when all my other usernames on other games, as well as steam, is TronX33. I would like to have my current username changed to TronX33
-
Yeah mate, it is broken by the 1.0+ updates. It will not work in the current version of the game, sorry man. I don't know what you mean by the head thing. She was a beauty, just watch the video!
Thanks for commenting, I will add a message saying its outdated.
Cheers.
- - - Updated - - -
I mean that here is a this intake thing? overhanging the ladder into the cockpit, so my kerbal can't get within range to get into the seat.
-
Uhhh..... Bill's head is stuck on the overhang in the belly. Also, it seems that the Eagle likes to go belly up while flying.
-
This one is a cargo ship, but I'm sure you could trun it into a battleship by adding guns and armor.
JR
Mother of god.... That is amazing. And it will do well for my nefarious purposes. Thanks JR, I'll be giving you some rep for sure.
-
This looks amazing. Rep for you. I saw another B-17 up, and it pales in comparison to this one. Does anyone know where I can find a B-29 Superfortress replica? Been wanting one to drop an atomic bomb (BDArmory add-on) on those bastards in the R&D facility who can't do anything without me busting my [CENSORED] off to get science.
BTW, where can I find a tutorial on making bearings?
-
Battleships? on World of Warships maybe...
This is Kerbal Space Program... not Kerbal Marine Corps...
But... But... giant naval cannons.
You'll find craft files for all kinds of ships (space, water or otherwise) in the Spacecraft Exchange section of the forum.JR
Yeah, I searched the forums as well as on google, but all of them seemed to be outdated, i.e. built before 0.90, or with the old wing parts, etc.
-
It's been broken by updates.
At the time of 0.90 when this craft was done the ion engines used to function at 100% efficiency inside the atmosphere.
Now it's 5% efficiency and also the new aero model gives less lift at low speed.
goddammit. It looked like a really cool ship. Oh well.
-
Don't know if this is the right thread, but does anyone know where can find any Kerbin-water based battleships? There's an add-on for BDArmory that adds giant Naval guns, but I have nothing to use it on. Mods, move to the correct forum if this is not where it belongs. Thanks!
-
I don't understand how to fly this. It accelerates like .1 m/s in 10 seconds. What am I doing wrong? Great craft tho
-
I have only one part mod: Parameciumkid's jump drive. So, after unlocking it n the Tech Tree, i basically stopped using launchers, and just tossed the thing with a warp drive into the air, and warped into orbit.
-
As I said, sticking to a common decent profile really helps in reaching a specific landing zone, but what you use is up to you.
A Pe of 45 km works well because there is a noticeable increase in drag at 50 km. Without additional thrust, anything that dips that low is going down somewhere near Pe with correct flight profile. Spend too long too high and variances make it hard to predict landing site. I also strongly recommend keeping it above 36 km. That's about the height where lift starts to work. You want to linger there so let drag, not orbital momentum, take you there. Anything at our below 20 km is crazy. You are getting to the danger zone on orbital momentum alone and not allowing drag to do much work for you.
For fun, the extended mission for one of my cheap probes was a radial return from Minmus orbit. I added 500 m/s at the start to target KSC directly and another 1 km/s before reentry. I think it popped without any heat guages at about 36 km. It was relatively fine until that point.
Thanks for the tidbit about the atmosphere and lift! It will greatly help me in the future.
Part of why angling up is helpful, other than bleeding off speed, is it keeps your altitude from dropping as quickly. Therefore you stay in thinner atmosphere and have more time to lose speed before dropping to thicker atmosphere.There's kind of a sweet spot as burges points out. In thinner upper atmosphere it is a very high angle of 30-40, but around 20km altitude you'd be pointed just above the horizon a few degrees. You can watch the little dial at the top that shows your vertical drop rate, and try to find the angle that minimizes that(keeps it as close to the 0 marker as possible, although you won't be able to get it very close to 0 descent rate, just that you are trying to find the angle where you aren't dropping as quickly).
Also, when you drop your 170km orbit periapsis down into the atmosphere, don't drop it very deep or you will come in too steeply and reach thick atmosphere too quickly.
I usually don't drop my periapsis below 55k, but if I'm coming in really hot from a high apoapsis, I'll only do 60 or 65k. In those cases it might happen that it takes multiple orbits skimming the atmosphere to slow down.
Ah, ok, so have to let it slow down gradually high in the atmosphere. I was applying what I knew for planning capsule re-entries to space-plane re-entries.
Rep for you, ajburges, and pretty much everyone else who responded
-
If you have access to airbrakes, include them on your design; they'll help you lose speed without gaining a great deal of heat. Other than that, what ajburges said; it'd also help to know if you're using FAR or stock air.
I'm using stock air. So will what ajburnes said help me avoid my wings exploding? And if I'm supposed to make a 45 km high orbit, how do I target the KSC?
-
So, i had a Space Shuttle replica made by Naito up in orbit in a 170km x 170km orbit, about to land at KSC. However, during reentry, my wings exploded due to overheating, as well as the cargo bay, and mono-propellant tanks. The craft says that it's compatible with KSP 1.0.4. Should I just set ignore max temperature and unbreakable joints? Should I go in like the real shuttle, or go in nose first?
Kerbal Space Porgram- The Beginnings
in KSP Fan Works
Posted
Ahem... Kerbal Space Porgram?