Jump to content

velve

Members
  • Posts

    146
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

5 Neutral

Profile Information

  • About me
    Spacecraft Engineer
  1. You have to have the navball open in order to filter everything. If you hide the navball, for some reason clicking on the filter options become impossible.
  2. Yes they seem to constantly appear. The trick is, if you feel like you're exploiting a gameplay mechanic or a bug, just don't do it. I did it once or twice but when I realized they were recurring I just ignore it. Besides most of the test (x) part on launch are kind of an exploit too. If you just do them you also end up with no expense but a lot of income. You might be interested in trying out the mods "Fineprint" and "Mission controller extender". They add a lot of more interesting contracts to help alleviate the grinding of part contracts.
  3. Are you using any mods? (This should be in support though, either of the two categories.) I recall running into an issue like this after incorrectly updating a mod.
  4. Was wondering when this would come along. Thanks for implementing it, I'm gonna wait for B9 as well, but will be sure to keep an eye on it. I am however also curious as to how this plays with FAR, I'm sure this is a chain of echoes to follow, but maybe include it in your description whether it is compatible yet or not.
  5. So you decided to read the replies of people actually trying to help you and understand your problem, only to come back to post a reply that I'm pretty sure has alienated anyone interested in helping you finding a solution, without adding any new relevant information. Well done. @peachoftree, have a look at this mod http://help.howproblemsolution.com/500957/plugin-0-25-pilot-assistant-0-1-nov-14-on-kerbal-space-program Appears to indluce PID tuning of some sort.
  6. Voted procedural fairings, but might I just add do you not rather want to do a bit of PC maintenance, for instance, disable anything in the process manager that you don't need to free up some RAM. I just don't see how so few mods could possibly be crashing KSP. I run with at least 3 times your list with massive parts packs and KSP is still fine. This is assuming you do at least have 4GB RAM in your machine, if not then I understand your predicament.
  7. To be fair to the second machine you linked, I can provide some input from running a laptop with an HD5470. The one in your link is effectively twice as good as mine, and I'm capable of running kerbal just fine, albeit not on high but medium-low. Full textures I don't need to compromise here either. The graphics my machine is capable of, does not ruin the experience at all. I can still get my 60fps vsync on those settings. You might be able to reach high settings, but This is purely a guess based on how mine performs. I think my input could perhaps be quite valuable because my laptop also has an i3 processor. only a 2.4ghz clock speed though. The concerning pc has a 3.4ghz clock speed. I think if you go for the second machine you will not be disappointed at all, as long as you don't get addicted to or feel the need to run everything on full with graphics mods etc, and try to get 1000fps hehe. Good luck
  8. Realchute uses its own scaling. There is no reason to use tweakscale for it. They both work perfectly together.
  9. Wow awesome support, very fast biotronic you are legend! Testing new version right now. Thank you. //All the issues I was having have been resolved with this new update, Thank you. Only problem now is with KER and the mass values it reports, seems to be a bit buggy. If I go from a 1.25 engine to a 62.5 engine the mass only reduces by about 2%, same applies with upscaling, yet now and then the values do seem appropriate after removing and re-attaching, but only now and then. But that I'm sure is quite a mission to try and get working, I am no way trying to sound like I'm whining, just trying to help. and if I recall was there in 1.44 as well so no biggie.
  10. Yes, I noticed this recently too. I am also playing on hard career mode and thoroughly enjoying myself but this little oversight on my part suddenly left me scratching my head as to why I was suddenly gaining a lot more funds. On hard career mode you tend to focus a lot more on your funds so I'm sure it wouldn't bother players on say easy difficulty for example. But alas i eventually got a bit frustrated at all these "no free launches". What I can suggest to fix this and still keep your aggressive campaigns intact is to download the "Mission Controller Extender 2" mod, What it has is a little red button you can push after a failed or in this case test launch, where it then charges you 1000 funds to revert to the VAB. You don't need to use all the extra contracts if you don't want to, you can disable them in the GUI. I use it with all my on launchpad tests just to try and balance the relationship between the OP of the admin building. Its not a huge difference but might help from feeling cheaty if you commit 100% for example to the negotiations giving you plus minus half your ship value added to your total funds. The red button takes you directly to the VAB thus skipping the recovered parts section, but you are still able to complete contracts after you have used it. //oh I realized this is in the unmodded installs section sorry, not sure if you are open to mods, but all you will really be using is the red button, as I said you can disable all the other facets of mission controller and just use it for the "pay to revert".
  11. Hi there! I'm assuming its normal that the cost of the parachutes go up the smaller you scale them, I'm just wondering why this is? From a technical point, is it to balance the benefits of having less mass? thanks for a great mod wouldn't play without it.
  12. Thank you very much Master Tao that resolved the problem, should have tried that first before posting here. Sorry. //alright so with a bit more playing around I seem to be having a problem with this new version. It has to be something to do with either the autoscale feature or the part chain hierarchy scale system, or something else. Basically. when building on any scale if I alt copy a part like a fuel tank the new copied part has a significantly less fuel. here is an example of the chain please note the 22.500/22.500 meter. Then the second "alt copied" part. And third When launching with this setup for example, the fuel guage will not move until the last 0.352 is being used, then it goes so fast you barely see it. This happens if I select a new fuel tank and it autoscales to the root scale as well. Making it impossible to use a larger first stage on my rockets. Perhaps There is a setting in the mod folder I'm not aware of? Perhaps a conflict of some sort, my mods list is pretty extensive but tweakscale worked fine with version 1.44, so I don't think it's a conflict
×
×
  • Create New...