.jpg.d8aabf4a0f818ab5875c7753dc19d759.jpg)
nothingSpecial
-
Posts
380 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by nothingSpecial
-
.thumb.jpg.c0b3701c705fb8cca987c13012d9b47e.jpg)
They also can turn black as they burn up in the atmosphere, that should look impressive even with simplicity/ -
This. This please. So much this. Or "Serket".
-
Wow yes. Pleaseoh my. It... Oh. ...Sorry. I- Okay, I regained breathe. It's wonderful and I believe it should be perfect with 2.5m service module. Perhaps you can call it for Orion constellation's star, like Rigel or Betelgeuse?
-
Hey Beale, what would operational characteristics of Fregat be? How far can we sling Soyuz in terms of Delta-Vee? I do like spherical things, my survey sats usually have 'roundified' tanks but if I can launch my Duna surveyor on it, I wouldn't miss an opportunity. Or spirit.
-
But of course, you've already got sources of inspiration!
- 22,713 replies
-
- 2
-
-
- totm march 2020
- mod
- (and 2 more)
-
All I really want now is capsule that fits that small inflatable to have a Soyuz clone with stockalike cloth/thermal blanket.
-
Artificial Gravity In KSP
nothingSpecial replied to LightStrikeBoom's topic in KSP1 Suggestions & Development Discussion
KSP physics allow it. It's just Kerbals who don't believe they can walk when starsky is spinning insanely in their eyes so they just lie ragdolly on the floor of your constucted rings. But you can use rovers! -
Nope. Vast majority of mods has nothing to do with simulations. Sig doesn't say anything about modding the game the way user doesn't like, just modding it til it crashes. And not everyone likes repetitions. That's not irony, that's context.Oh, you probably read "and nothing else" like "I don't want nothing else", not like "I don't want simulation with nothing else"? Well, that's context too. But it would be ironic, sure.
-
Oh my god. That's more awesome than the already made game.
-
So unplanned lithobraking is planned lithoassisted vessel modification that ended in unplanned braking?
-
Can I just have low-poli graphics in game? Don't really have problems with using revert button.
-
Scenario Creator
nothingSpecial replied to Wjolcz's topic in KSP1 Suggestions & Development Discussion
I like this idea. -
I see.
-
Would it now be pronounced like FASA (pronounced like NASA but with an F (FASA)) but with an N (NASA)?
-
I have heard you guys talking about Skylab and Apollo parts? With Apollo (already possible), Gemini (already in, and you are talking more), Skylab (where you mentioned it) and Mercury (Tantares+), Tantares starts to become everything-space-race-and-beyond-and-still-perfectly-modular-mod. I must warn you. That is too awesome. You can't handle it! You madmen!
-
What's wrong with HGR textures? The last update's tanks and engine are beautiful and work with stock perfectly, just wait till Orionkermin would bring other pieces in line with them (that was planned AFAIK, just people tend to be bysy in their lifes).
-
If you go for static two-sided panel (unlike usual panels that have to rotate/be rotated with whole craft), they can have foward antennaes, i.e. you can trade real functionality for real overall shape.
-
Oh my god. Now anything can be built.
-
Yeah, refueling with monoprop would be sane with given dimensions.I also, IIRC, used TKS once with HGR tanks instead of crew/cargo modules to refuel something.
-
Yes so much this.As a person with not high-end PC I usually play with lowest render and lowest texture quality, but sometimes I want to look how my ship's looking. It's really disappointing that I cannot edit render quality in escape menu, just to make screenshots, and that I cannot bring menu in VAB/SPH - just to know what my design will look like in flight.
-
Just perfect. It should make a really nice modular design.
-
Yiss. Oh yiss. How do they look with current Vostok engine model?
-
Spoiler: they meant "we" as "Kerbalkind".
-
Why so much fuss about rep, it's color etc etc?
.thumb.jpg.c0b3701c705fb8cca987c13012d9b47e.jpg)
