Deutherius

Nope. And I'll have you know I'm pretty well defined, not obscure at all Umm... Tetryds?

Looks like you've got some missing letters there. I'll be a good gent and finish that sentence for you - Random animals never take your entropy. And your "random" letters mean: Terrible radioactivity immensely fames older racoons carrying emmentaler. thrbdkjt

Granted. The Mun is just a string of ones and zeroes, so nothing interesting happens. I wish for a glass of water.

Also... AFAIK KSP doesn't care about your symmetry, it just cares about the center of mass. You can make an assymetrical craft and it will fly just like a symmetrical one, provided that the CoM and drag coefficients on both sides are equivalent. (Yes, OP uses FAR which would make a problem. But his payload is in a fairing, so no possible problems there)

If you meant Low Eve Orbit, then I agree, aerobraking is free, but getting away is costly. Better to just exploit Eve for gravitational slingshots. If you, however, meant Low Earth Kerbin Orbit (which would make more sense considering the "randezvous from the surface" part), I'll have to disagree on that one. I'm horrible at eyeballing launch windows for optimal randezvous, so I usually end up on the other side of Kerbin than the station I want to dock with (usually flying SSTOs). But even then I'm already at a similar orbit (because I was planning to dock with it), so it's just a tradeoff between deltaV spent and time I can wait. And I can usually way a few orbits, so it's pretty cheap (<100 dV) and the gain should be considerable.

What a brilliant excuse to conduct some torture valuable research!

Granted. Unfortunately for you, I always eat when I'm depressed. You can thank mythbusters884 for corrupting my wish to be happy After eating the burger and the fish I just wish for a toothpick.

Anybody else feels like Arugela is losing his sanity? (probably unrelated -> <- this emoticon is called "Cheesy" in the advanced reply page (also unrelated, but I want some cheese now)) Could the answer be an Alcubierre drive? (or any FTL drive) EDIT: That wouldn't work because they're just speculative ideas. How can we find it in the solar system if it's not real?

Thread and poll title don't match. I have taken thousands of screenshots, but only have ~1000 still lying around Which one do you want? EDIT: No longer valid since threads merged. On topic, I would say ~2000, with only ~1000 still surviving

Xerotic xiphoid zippers question sanity per train yields. oaueiauz

Granted. You are now really poor and eligible to recieve two cheetos from the newly established Kerbal charity. I wish to be happy.

(imgur)xffLD(/imgur) substitute () for []

It would be best to provide us with a craft download so we can test it, or at least provide more info (when exactly does it spin out of control? In what manner? Screenshots would help). The only thing I can tell you from looking at the screenshot is check your fuel lines. If one or more of the side tanks drain asymmetrically it will become a problem.

It should also be pointed out that each CMG at ISS can only produce torque in one direction at a time, while all of the KSP's Reaction Wheels can produce torque in all 3 axes at once.

Is it the Hubble Space Telescope? Or maybe Philae?

8/10, I like me some orchestra. I'll be sure to check out more.

I always thought that was the point - random, don't make sense. In other words, Kerbal I agree, everyone should be able to play however they want, be it realistic or wacky. And the right clicking can be a PITA. It would be nice if one could assign the "test part" option to an action group.

Slight OT: What's with all the hate for part testing contracts? I alway accept a whole bunch of them and see if I can engineer a contraption that tests them all in one launch. I have never been dissappointed or bored with it, mainly because there's always a different combination and I never launch the same craft twice It can be quite a challenge as well.

What? But... But... First Mr. Nimoy, now Sir Pratchett. It's a sad year so far... May he rest in piece peace. EDIT: How do I english

My last guess (and it only fits partially) would be virtual particles or gravity. After that I'm out of ideas and requesting a hint

It's hard giving advice on a subject like this. I mean, it's easy to give advice, it's hard to give a good advice. We don't have all the necessary info to judge the case fairly. Everyone also has their own biases. That being said, I'd advise you to move on ASAP, by any means necessary. Worst thing that can happen to you is getting stuck in a circle of false hopes and painful rejection while being someone's rebound/second pick (also, the guy she's getting back with probably won't like you too much). I've been there, and the longer you stay the harder it is to get up again. As others have said, it gets better with time - just find a way to distract yourself for the time being, especially with activities that don't let you think about this too much. Good luck, I hope it gets better soon

Seriously opinionated petty xenophobic zebrafish induce pneumonia. ksbrlfgv

Right on. -1 to 6 it is.

Granted. The ships explode spontaneously on vessel load. I wish for medicine to be cheaper. EDIT: Ninja'd.

Are you guys aware that you skipped 16? Lets not exclude any numbers now, shall we? Go back. 17.