[[1.8.x] AutomatedScienceSampler - V1.3.5 - 18.10.2019]

Ok, so what definitely does not trigger for me is the solar particle collector, I think the irradiance scan also. The magnetometer and telescope work actually. The following picture also proves that I only did highly scientific gravity testing and no jumping for fun at all while on Minmus surface:

[[1.8.x] AutomatedScienceSampler - V1.3.5 - 18.10.2019]

I looked all over the settings as I noticed this, but I cant find a setting there. Did I miss a configuration or does this not use the DMagic Orbital Science instruments?

[[1.0][Release-5-0][April 28, 2015] Active Texture Management - Save RAM!]

I have an issue with both USI Karbonite and MagicSmoke Infernal Robotics. It looks like the textures for these are not or not properly loaded with ATM. USI Parts become grey and Infernal Robotics Parts look all black. If anyone could fix this or point me at how to fix it, I´d be grateful!

[[1.0] SimpleScienceFix v1.1 - Run Multiple EVA and Crew Reports and Surface Samples. (May 7th, 2015)]

So this is basically http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/90678-0-90-Science-Containers-v-08-2 ?

Or is there any advantage of using one over the other?

[Show off your flags MEGATHREAD]

Spiced up my old flag a little:

Small ingame size:

[[WIP] TweakScale - Development Thread]

Hi

Any ideas what causes Tweakscale to stop scaling the amount of fuel inside a tank that scales nicely otherwise? I´m lost :/

Edit: further tests show it happens when EPL (updated today) is installed, and/or when MFT is installed. Maybe also insterstellar fuel switch bundled with the cryo engine mod.

I already asked taniwha who was online in the chat:

<taniwha> that makes no sense

<taniwha> EL should not be affecting any such thing

[[1.0.5] Atomic Age - Nuclear Propulsion - Red Hot Radiators]

Danke fürs Update :-)

[[1.2.2] Contract Pack: Bases and Stations 3.6.1 (30/04/2017) (formerly Kerbin Space Station)]

Very cool, many thanks for this nice pack

[[1.2.2] Contract Pack: Bases and Stations 3.6.1 (30/04/2017) (formerly Kerbin Space Station)]

severedsolo, could you change the requirement of the station core docking port to any docking port maybe? I would like to use the contract pack but build my KSS out of the FusTek Parts

Thanks for the nice pack

[[1.1.2] Kerbal Inventory System (KIS) 1.2.12]

Krakenfour, sounds like you try to attach things with a kerbal that is not an engineer.

[[1.10.x] SafeChute v2.1.20 (continued)]

Thanks for keeping this updated

[[1.3.0] Stork Delivery System [SDS] version 0.2.6 [30.05.2017]]

Thanks for updating

[[1.8.x] AutomatedScienceSampler - V1.3.5 - 18.10.2019]

Oh yeah. I am stupid. Thanks

[[1.8.x] AutomatedScienceSampler - V1.3.5 - 18.10.2019]

I just wanted to chime in and ask where I can find the mods settings when I read your post WaveFunctionP

[[1.8.x] AutomatedScienceSampler - V1.3.5 - 18.10.2019]

It was acting up only after reverting to launch so assembly should be fine.

As for other mods if they derive of the stock class they should be recognized by ForScience. I had a quick look into that mods source and yes it should work.

Thank you so much

[[WIP] TweakScale - Development Thread]

KSP 1.0.1: same procedure as everytime, waiting for KAE and moduleManager to update...

EDIT: new Version is up! KAE is updated and MM seems still to work.

Thank you

[[1.0.4] Smart Parts v1.6.6 | DDS Textures and Bug Fixes | July 5]

Yay! Thanks!

edit: If you are at it ... could you please fix that bug that the smart parts often don't recognize if the fuel is drained? I assume some kind of floating point issue a floor or round (round seems better) should help.

In KSP it happens that the fuel tank is not really drained to 0% , so its like 0.0001% left, and that makes the condition to fire at 0% fuel false. It is also usually a good idea to write 0.01 % for "empty" tanks in kOS scripts for the same reason. If you set the smart part to 1% left or so, it will probably work all the time.

[[1.8.x] AutomatedScienceSampler - V1.3.5 - 18.10.2019]

Hi SpaceTiger, looks like a great add-on!

The known issue about reverting, is that reverting to launch or also to assembly? I would be very suprised if the issue persisted when reverting to VAB, I am however ued to strangeness when reverting to launch what I gave up doing anyway because of such things.

Does this mod work together with mods that store science in containers or command pods like "Science Containers" (http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/90678-0-90-Science-Containers-v-08-2) ?

Thanks

[[1.3] Smartstage, intelligent VAB reset button 2.9.7]

thank you for updating

[[WIP] TweakScale - Development Thread]

Heyyy nice

Grats on releasing 2.0

How did you go with the engine scaling for release? Is the heat still a problem?

[[1.3.0] Stork Delivery System [SDS] version 0.2.6 [30.05.2017]]

I suspect this could still be working in 1.0. Lets test!

- - - Updated - - -

Ok, its basically working, but the lower attachment nodes need to be corrected for 1.0. They need to be flipped over on the short and medium frames. I tried them that way and they work

[[1.4] SpaceY Heavy-Lifter Parts Pack v1.17.1 (2018-04-02)]

Ahh. Nothing better to get up in the morning, having a fresh coffee, a free day and an update to one of your favorite mods.

Thank you Necrobones

[[WIP] TweakScale - Development Thread]

Oh. I put in a patch to test scaling the service bays, it seems to work fine.

// New 1.0 Stock Service Bays

@PART[ServiceBay_125]
{
    %MODULE[TweakScale]
    {
        type = stack
        defaultScale = 1.25
    }
}

@PART[ServiceBay_250]
{
    %MODULE[TweakScale]
    {
        type = stack
        defaultScale = 2.5
    }
}

[[WIP] TweakScale - Development Thread]

I just did a test with a small rocket and airbrakes, and it seems to work as intended. Downscaled airbrakes brake less, weigh less and cost less. Upscaled ones weigh more, cost more aaaand...brake more! To a point where it becomes like a controllable parachute

On a sidenote: Large Airbrakes look awesome. Gonna build a dropship soon with those.

(As I said, I am not a spaceplane guy, I never built a plane or flew one. So my input is from VAB/Launchpad only

From my point of view things seem to work

About that fairing thing. If someone really needs fairing bases above 3.75m, he/she can always get the procedural fairings mod which works fine with tweakscale. Since there are so many easy to get alternatives to the stock fairings its not really a problem for anyone. Although I admit I *like* the new stock fairings and how they work in the VAB.

[[WIP] TweakScale - Development Thread]

Yes, but my MJ scaled the numbers along, the latest dev build from an hour ago. Sarbian does not seem to sleep.

Anyways! I just clustered several 1.25m downscaled KR-2L and like them. They perform much better than any smaller and upscaled or 1.25m engine. The formula seems to be upscale for more TWR and only slight increase fuel efficiency and downscale for fuel efficiency but worse TWR than upscaled engines. I might be wrong, I have not tested every single engine. Any scaled engine however seems to beat the stock size.

Except the worst tiny engines who have such bad isp and thrust that the scaling exponent cant beat the more efficient engines.