CERVERUS

You have a Module Manager plugin,in your Game Data Folder?

I agree 100%,with this oppinion! I will use this plugin for transfer Kerbals to my space program.

The orbiter module,upgrade to secondary,pod-lander,with changes to .cfg parameters and with engines and chutes.

You find it inside to the the NEW released HOME in Plugins folder.

Really needs these tree folders about work normally the HOME? If not,can i delete them,for save some ram memory? http://prntscr.com/3owiwh

About this new released HOME?

To me everything ok!!! http://prntscr.com/3ovg9t

Me too i don't see it....hahahaha

Maybe because Spaceport closed...you need the sfr plugin? sfr plugin download link: https://www.dropbox.com/s/xn9xmto915y5lfw/sfrPartModules1.dll

Have a nice day,bro!

Yes my friend,the same happened to me and i fixed with this way,i read inside to the .cfg and i see the solution.

If missed parts,you must create a NEW folder with name "BobCatind",and put inside all "HOME2" folder. http://prntscr.com/3ov1u6

Awesome...i hope this amazing spacecraft,released someday and with JSI monitors!

Very interesting Project,i hope you keep it up! I hope for a release this parts! http://prntscr.com/3o06is

I say "maybe",Denny,cancel,not sure. Is my answer to the users,do the question,"why if Denny work for IVA,must do the same and frizzank",or "who vote the IVA,don't know Denny work for the same Project". After this,i like the Denny's LEM IVA,yes is so realistic,but i can't "read" nice enough the important indicators when i do a Mun surface aproach and landing with IVA.

(Sorry for my English) I am one of IVA voters. I select IVA,because,if "win",frizzank add it to his future plans,at the FASA pack. Denny maybe aboyt some reasons cancelled his IVA for Mercury pod. I like IVA,and i like if this can be possibly released from the creators of packs,for the same reasons,i like there is Mercury pod,the same time the SQUAD release the Mk1 pod. For some people Mk1 pod and Mercury pod,do the same "work",and is waste of effort,somebody spend time to release the Mercury. The same and about IVA,somebody say,"we have the mk1 IVA,its enough this,we can use this,and don't need a "special" IVA for Mercury. About me,if somebody create a pod,is more complete if have and IVA,after this i am happy if the Mercury will have a Mercury IVA.

I know my friend,about Denny he will do this,but maybe about some reasons,never complete this IVA. When i see this thread with frizzank,ask us for vote,and i see this include the Mercury IVA,i vote (the IVA),because i am sure,if "win" the IVA,frizzank do it sure. I think will be to the FASA Project(IVA),because frizzank put it if win,Denny only speak about this,don't have it to his program "Official".

I agree,the FASA pack is so complete with engines to this phase,if miss something,i feel is an IVA Mercury,because the other spacecrafts have (GEMINI-BIG GEMINI-GEMINI LANDER and LEM the last two from Denny). I believe must add this IVA (Mercury) before this pack go a step forward,with engines,tanks and other staff-equipment.

I like Mercury Pod IVA,i voted,with this i think,the FASA pack be complete. Ofcourse i am happy when Denny,do and the Apollo CM IVA. Thanks.

Add "rescaleFactor = x.xx"

I believe its ok...i like this logic of assemply!

Nice work my friend!

I have the same problem,and never i install the "Texture Reduction Pack",and happened when Apollo CSM be to orbit not with LES,but with chute heatshield,and one time happened to chute when i "come" back to Kerbin when i separate the chute heatshield i deploy my chutes and at 500 m above the sea when the full chute deploy. http://prntscr.com/3b25mx

http://nassp.sourceforge.net/wiki/Future_Expansion

I have problems how you see to the pics,with the UV Map,for example the "SLM 24" appears twice,and one of them is like to mirror of the other.