Siama

Без логов сложно что-то сказать. Выложи C:\Users\<username>\AppData\LocalLow\Squad\Kerbal Space Program\Player.log может станет понятнее, в чём там проблема.

Sorry) I'm using 1.8.1 but I think it's just syntax issue. Take a look to GameData/ModuleManager.ConfigCache: UrlConfig { parentUrl = Squad/Parts/Engine/ionEngine/ionEngine.cfg PART { name = ionEngine module = Part author = Chris Adderley (Nertea) <cut> MODULE { name = TweakScale type = stack defaultScale = 0.625 TWEAKSCALEEXPONENTS { mass = 2.5 } } MODULE { name = TweakScale:FOR type = stack defaultScale = 0.625 scaleFactors = 0.2, 0.3, 0.45, 0.625, 0.95, 1.25, 1.875, 2.5 } And this one cannot be tweakscaled at all: UrlConfig { parentUrl = WarpPlugin/Parts/Engines/AluminiumEngine/LiquidMetalInjectionEngine.cfg PART { module = Part name = AluminiumLiquidMetalEngine author = TD <cut> MODULE { name = IntegratedRadiator partMass = 5 isDeployable = false emissiveColorPower = 6 radiatorArea = 4 keepMaxPartTempEqualToMaxRadiatorTemp = false } %MODULE[TweakScale]:FOR[WarpPlugin] { type = stack_interstellar defaultScale = 2.5 scaleFactors = 0.625, 0.95, 1.25, 1.875, 2.5, 3.75, 5.0, 7.5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40 }

Nice commits on May 9, 2020. ionEngine now can have negative mass. Tweakscale 2.4.3.14; KSPIE 1.25.18.5; ModuleManager 4.1.3

It's just 4-letters codes for airports. AFAIK this codes widely used in flight management systems (FMSs)

Maybe this is the sign to use ICAO codes?

How can I figure out which propellants will be available for nozzle? I mean before researching nozzle itself or its upgrade. I see long list of almost all resources but it seems to be irrelevant and buggy (at least - double LqdCO with different ISP multipliers). And what exactly will be allowed with "When researched, allows Thermal Engines to use additional propellant" upgrade?

Change from ElectricCharge = 0.002459947 // 0.005590789*0.44 to ElectricCharge = 0.002459947 -0.002459947 // 0.005590789*0.44 and 100% of consumed EC goes to heat (and same for remelter) will heat the furnace but I'm not sure about proportions (and where excess heat goes). @taniwha, is 1 Ingredient.heat == 1 Joule == 1 EC ? Will it explode someday if generated heat is not consumed explicitly in the recipe (as in LFOFired mode) or radiators will handle it?

Could you please include this file into release?

Damn. Now I'm unable to reproduce it too. Just reinstalled ksp from scratch one more time and that's it... "Energy flow" and indicated "Power supply" still decreasing over time when it should not (perfectly round orbit around the Kerbol, craft oriented to have =1.00 exposure) but Electric Charge is not affected anymore. It was old plugin version So this is my test craft: https://pastebin.com/vQ5J3yKi (mk1pod + tweakscaled 3 times batteryBankMini + largeSolarPanel)

Oh, I got it... You just hid details under "Consumer Component". But it still discharging battery and reporting weird Power Demand and Utilisation.

Nope. Tried the same but still discharging and wasting 800+ kW for nothing.

I see that it is proportional to "free space for electric charge". Charging battery will reduce demand value. And if I lock EC flow on my Big Test Battery, demand will instantly drop to 15MW from few GW. Moreover this bug requires additional power source to operate With 3 parts (command pod + battery + solar panel) I have 35W consumption before deploying panel and less than (and constant!) 1MW after. But with PB-NUK added... demand value is rising as battery discharges and 4GW is not the limit.

One more interesting thing: electric (dis)charge is NOT scaled with time acceleration (but slowly changes over time) and power demand in Megajoules Management Display decreases with acceleration. Time factor EC drain (unit/s) DC Demand (MW) x1 656 4650 x5 654 1050 x10 651 623 x50 630 138 x100 603 77.6

Hello. Please check couple of things: Does quicksave-quickload fix the chaos that has already begun (retract panel back before reloading to avoid waking this bug again)? Is it fine at night? If both "yes" then likely we have same issue here.

Transmitting new experiments data: More power can be produced by panel - more it will waste after retraction. Discharge rate numerically equals to Energy flow at moment when you push "retract solar panel" or "disable receiver" button.