53miner53

When your computer gives up on physics.

Well, the RCS could be on a service module, or you could use the RCS tug that is at the LKO station. Does that help?

@wrench-in-the-works has 2 days left in his time limit.

Banned for banning someone with approximately one tenth your post count.

7/10 yellow text and black background

That's a better idea, I think. Another rule revision for me.

It wasn't when I posted. @Tex

I guess the ability to have 2 Sr docking ports without counting toward the part total doesn't mean that people will have them. I'll modify the rules for this.

Banned for banning a moderator

Challenger STS-1a and 1b complete! https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B0eMT8zRijNmVWEtb190M3pMYXc Challenger is based off of the Shuttle IIc concept that @Speeding Mullet had made a shuttle for. I designed my own eject system using the size 3 decoupler and some size 3-Mk3 adapters, which also allowed me to add some size 3 fuel tanks. This, along with the use of 4 LV-Ns for the OMS, gives the first version I designed as much delta v as the LR version of Columbia. Columbia is now in the process of redesign until further notice. Edit: mod list for Challenger is identical to the mod list for Columbia.

Today is not a weekend. @Tex

Ok then, that makes sense. I feel that if it doesn't mess with the save file, it's fine.

@Combatsmithen is running out of time for his turn.

Why do you want to clear the mod by me, @Cunjo Carl? I don't know how the mod works, or whether it will affect the save file negatively! I do have concerns about @Jeb federation's crane though, namely whether or not it uses modded parts.

STS-5-8 complete! The station has a core module, 2 science modules, 1 crew module, and 2 docking modules. https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B0eMT8zRijNmZDZqS1pVRjBhN0E I had some trouble with the docking modules being stuck in the cargo bay of the shuttle. I used that as an opportunity to test KAS/KIS and see if I knew how to use them. I then landed that shuttle, so moving the docking port was kinda pointless. One of the docking modules escaped the cargo bay while I was rendezvousing another shuttle, so it was docked with the station and I left the replacement module behind before launch. I think I'm not going to try STS-9 until I go through some of the missions with a second shuttle I'm designing. You'll see it tomorrow.

Space shuttle- first orbital spaceplane, also happens to function as a heavy lifter SR-71- worlds fastest jet F-16- relaxed static stability+fly by wire=maneuverability unless you want to fly straight. F4U Corsair- distinctive wing shape that causes it to be more maneuverable at higher speeds. C-17- just because they fly over my house a lot.

I agree, but I'm not sal_vager. I wonder what @monstah thinks about that though.

Yes it is

Nada. @munlander1

Banned for using a picture of the stock profile picture to trick people into thinking you don't have a profile picture.

Thanks for taking responsibility and trying to fix the issue @rocketbuilder. What's missing from the save file you gave him?

I should try to keep the folder clean. Edit: I'm keeping the old versions in the backup folder.

Sorry, no devs here for now. @KAL 9000

I feel I "got it" in the demo when I first got to orbit without also getting on an interplanetary trajectory. Or when I figured out asparagus staging, and had a much smaller launch craft that could go almost as far as my Mun lander. Or when I rescued a kerbal that was stranded on the Mun, after failing to do so with the past 3 launches, 2 of which hit the exact same problem as the initial launch.

Go ahead and add your name to the waiting list!