LABenterprises
-
Posts
93 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Developer Articles
KSP2 Release Notes
Everything posted by LABenterprises
-
I think the TR-2L was chosen because of its superior grip to the RoveMax M1. Performance is the biggest part of this challenge, but I can understand why this would be a problem for some people. I'll see if we can change the rules to allow the RoveMax M1 in the main category.
-
On one of my better clean runs, the G-Force 2.0 managed to run around the kurburgring in 1:00 and my test track in 0:36. I'm still testing it and considering making a Le Mans racing variant. I've also come up with the design for another megacar I will begin working on soon, although I have yet to come up with a name.
-
Thanks, that definitely helps.
-
I absolutely agree with you and @Azimech, i'm not exactly sure what happened here, but it seems there's a bit of misunderstanding mixed in as well. @DoctorDavinci I can understand why you would feel offended and want to leave, but if you choose to stay, I promise I will make sure that everything works out.
-
I've spent the last seven or eight hours working on my latest megacar. Since my original G-Force was little more than an experimental hypercar I figured the name deserved more, so this will be called the G-Force 2.0. Its not done yet as I still have some tweaking to do but it should be ready in a few days. Also, does anyone know what the easiest way to record a KSP video is, taking screenshots will be difficult to impossible with how fast the car is.
-
This looks amazing! I love the stance.
-
I can't believe that its been well over a month since I first found out about this and i'm still blown away by it! In that case feel free to ask anything!
-
Ok then.
-
I'm not exactly sure what you mean by that but I have a feeling its something positive. :-)
-
I like the car, if need any help with increasing performance just ask C7-Rejects/prgm Trouble, He_162, or me, we all know plenty about making high performing cars.
-
The car seems to meet all the requirements and definitely fits the aesthetic we're looking for, I think it should be allowed but I can't make a final decision without He_162's opinion. I do think the car looks amazing though!
-
Awesome, thanks!
-
I Created a potential logo for our challenge, let me know what you think. .
-
I like that idea, but one thing to note is that more power doesn't always give a car the advantage for instance my BOLT uses 10 junos and my B19 uses only 8, however the B19 is 5 seconds faster around my test track. The key to success is aerodynamics that allow a car to remain stable at high speeds without understeer.
-
I think it that organization by stationary thrust would be best solution. It doesn't really matter what type of engine a car uses, but its the amount of thrust that's important, Its like if you have a car with a v8 and a car with a v12.
-
I may be able to help with the art for the page, I could probably make a logo in Microsoft paint.
-
We could change the rules but I would have to go over it with He_162.
-
Trust me you'll need at least 8 junos if you want to be able to break 89.4 mps/200 mph with a car made of wings. The amount of downforce the cars will have to create will slow them down a lot!
-
I like the rules, I'm already working out Ideas for my next megacar.
