Cassel

Rather, he tries to force NASA to keep the deadline that NASA set itself?

Bye bye to SLS? https://spacenews.com/nasa-considering-flying-orion-on-commercial-launch-vehicles/

But many has less experience in canceling their costly programs ;-) So when you compare those two factors NASA isn't that great...

Hahaha NASA at the finest :-) The best part is that NASA has more experience in not completing projects than on flights to other planets.

I know, but what part of Earth? Sea, mountains?

2:00 what is in background?

Ok, I can see the development of a species that viruses or bacteria examine with the help of smell or taste. And why did this species develop more than others? Maybe because such features gave him the advantage? So simple organisms that are unable to compete with more autonomous species. what? No sense, after the war in which the leader dies, he has no immediate change of power, this is the end for such a community. So between small organisms for which the Earth is huge and full of resources? Imagine such a war between swarms of people in every 100 million individuals. Several such wars would destroy the entire planet. Only that wars do not go all the time, so you do not always need soldiers. And when war begins, it's good to recruit and send workers to the front. The swarm does not have this option, so it needs more resources to match soldier number of more autonomous species. If they are aware, why is a laborer or soldier to sacrifice? What biological blockade forbids a regular worker to become an entrepreneur and open up competition for Ford? Speaking of the war on clubs and spears, in fact some individuals may be stupid and untrained, but with modern technologies you need trained soldiers, and nobody is born with the ability to drive a tank. If you can understand many views and perceive reality using many definitions of the same word. The mere fact of learning something by heart does not guarantee it. Here you prove that you have no idea about different ideologies. See the map, which I've pasted a few posts earlier. Even today on Earth there are many ideologies that perceive the world completely differently. For example one protects the lives of women and children, while others can send a child with a bomb in a backpack to gain something. This is a matter of fundamental differences on which completely different views and social structures are built. Of course I do not want to judge which one is right and which is not, because I would have to measure both using my ethical standards, so it's clear that the good would be consistent with my standards, and the bad one that behaves differently. Progress only occurs where different views are allowed, wherever only one view is permitted, stagnation occurs. You wrote about something other than hunting. Read about it, if you do not know the history and how many armed conflicts there were with hundreds of thousands of victims, we probably have nothing to talk about. Precise strikes have not become fashionable because knocking out the opponent does not pay off, but because the ability to destroy enemy equipment is easier than protecting it. If one side of the conflict comes up with a way to protect large groups of combat vehicles, then the concept of great battles and, consequently, hundreds of thousands of victims will come back.

Without a colorful vision you will not see many threats, you will not distinguish between many useful resources and the development of technology will be slower. Talk to someone who can not see the colors and ask how his life would look if he had to remove all the laws and regulations that makes his life easier. And what's the conclusion? Such a species will not be able to do many things that we can do? If you did not notice, we in the evolutionary process sacrificed other senses in favor of sight and intellect. The development of these two gave us an advantage over other animals that have better sense of smell and hearing, and even better see in the dark. If you had better hearing then your brain would have to analyze more signals all the time, and that would limit other abilities. With a zerg-hive-colony, this is a sci-fi idea, in fact such a species would not have a chance with more autonomous opponents. How would the colony evolve? Soldiers who can not reproduce will not be able to pass on their individual, better traits to the next generation, which means that soldiers from a more autonomous species will gain an advantage over time, because they will pass on their characteristics to children. Same with workers. Such a fat, immobile head of a colony would be an easy target. What would happen to the colony if its leader were killed? If the remaining members of the colony can not replace the leader, the whole colony dies with the death of the leader, and from the point of view of evolution, waste of resource and the way to extinction of whole species. How would leaders evolve? After all, their evolution would be very slow and each time one colony would win against another, it would come to a lot of waste of resources and many soldiers and workers would die. With more autonomous individuals, the species evolves faster. What if the workers fail and do not get enough food? Then the entire colony with all its technological achievements is lost? The fact that on Earth the hives stopped at the level of insects shows how this idea is not effective. What? No, we've been all the time and we are divided. Only today, the West has created such an illusion that all views other than the Western ones do not exist or are wrong. There have always been many ideologies in our history that competed with each other and were treated as equal. Thanks to this we owe the development. This is not possible for the species you see for the first time. Cold war is another rare case? If you have a weapon that can destroy a nation on the other side of the planet, you will not fight for one city, you must conquer the entire nation and take away its counterattack ability. Only so you can be victorious, same it will be with interplanetary wars.

Who told you such stupid things? After all, to deal with an intelligent being, its brain must have similar capabilities to ours. It forces certain elements in the construction of the body, the body must provide such a large brain with energy. This forces the construction of the digestive system, the amount and type of food taken. This creature must have eyesight capable of distinguishing colors and seeing the stars in the night sky, must have hearing and must be able to communicate with other individuals of its species. Otherwise, there is no chance to develop the community. Without the ability to see stars, aliens would not be able to conclude that there are other worlds beyond their planet. Aliens must have the ability to move and manipulate their surroundings, this forces them to have limbs that allow them to do so. It is impossible to build technology with horse hooves, they must have precise fingers, although they do not necessarily have to have 5 fingers. Evolution strives to simplify and save energy, so such a creature will have a minimum of limbs that are required to meet all these requirements. When it comes to social structure and ideologies, there are also some rules. Aliens must have economics, social structure, governments and different views on the same issues. In a developed community, this is a critical point, the ability to reconcile different, sometimes mutually exclusive views, and at the same time to exist on one planet. These differences are needed in order for the community to come up with solutions for every global problem and to be able to choose the one that gives the best results. If a species becomes one-view only, it will disappear as soon as there is a problem that it will not be able to solve. Probably their nervous system will have, like ours or any other animals we know, coded fear of alien and different-looking creatures. By this conditioning they will be careful and will not send around radio waves so that someone who is stronger than them will not notice them. I do not know yet how it would look from the point of view of technologically developed weapons, but our history shows that in past days one could fight for one city and end the war after victory. Since the Second World War, when war begins, the end is only when the entire nation is defeated. In inter-planetary wars it will probably be like that, when two species discover their existence, they will fight until one is completely defeated.

It seems to me that you do not understand how evolution works, it do not act randomly or chaotically. The fact that there are dolphins shows that mammals can live underwater, but they will become similar to fish. Fish may also live on land, but they will evolve be similar to land animals, just with different internal organs. I forgot what they are called, but there are two species of animals completely unrelated to each other, in the evolutionary tree they are further away from each other than man and elephant, but both species look almost the same, it's because they live in the almost same environment. Living organisms adapt best as they can to the environment, and even non-related creatures adapt to the given environment in the same way, because only one way is optimal. If aliens came to Earth, after a few generations they would look almost like us, although their internal organs, color of blood or skin color could be completely different.

Only 50? On Earth you have few civilizations, so on entire galaxy should be a lot more ;-) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Clash_of_Civilizations_mapn2.png

So why rover is dead? :-) In my opinion, it can not be called an extremely effective technology that is so sensitive to weather conditions.

Then making any Mars mission we should look for other power source than solar panels, because they are useless.

Are you AI or something? Because you write like one. What about asteroids like this one with strange Hawaii name? Could hit of fast object could cause it?

What caused this dust storm?

They want this to be reusable space ship? Is there anyone who believes in these foolishness? It will end up like Mars one.

It doesn't matter, even if I start game with command from console there is still same error.

I don't know, I am playing 1.6 KSP and latest BDA. Copies of what? I am using steam version of KSP.

ModuleManager.3.1.1

https://imgur.com/AP7KuLs

Only I have error "BDA won't work, missing module manager"? While I have module manager.

So rich won't be even driving on same roads as poor, future seems to shape very interesting. Some regions or cities in future may be available only by tunnels.

So road only for the rich.

That doesn't make sense, Norway have only 5 million people it is waste of money. You could make much cheaper infrastructure in Africa for 100 millions of people to make transport costs low enough for people to be able to afford transport food between regions that have food and that needs it.

But why? Costs must be huge. Now I feel need to play skylines cities on map with islands :-)