innociv
Members-
Posts
102 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Developer Articles
KSP2 Release Notes
Everything posted by innociv
-
[1.0.2] B9 Aerospace | Procedural Parts 0.40 | Updated 09.06.15
innociv replied to bac9's topic in KSP1 Mod Development
Well, it'd be hard to get that to look right. But more than that, more parts = more lag, especially with FAR. I was using the pwings mod, but thought these looked better and could reduce my part count further. Using these, I'll have to double or triple my amount of wing parts. As far as "flex cop out", well there is nothing preventing someone from putting thin 30m long reverse-swept wing on a 20m long aircraft, which should have extreme flexing but happens to be the most efficient thing to do in FAR. But I can't put 45m long wings on my 70m long space plane. There's nothing really ridiculous about what I'm trying to do, except the size, which fits in the hanger. http://cloud-4.steamusercontent.com/ugc/541887966941065545/A2BE644594B88524B4E4C2EF3334BCAA2BCD46B6/ I mean really, FAR should be calculating how much something should be flexing, even if it's not visible, and how that'd effect aerodynamics, if that's the issue. I'd like to see the pencils with massive skinny reverse swept wings gone, too. So the only way would be to recompile the source with those changes? I'm not sure I can do that. -
[1.0.2] B9 Aerospace | Procedural Parts 0.40 | Updated 09.06.15
innociv replied to bac9's topic in KSP1 Mod Development
I tried looking through the text files, but I couldn't find anything that'd let me increase the max values for them. I have a really big craft, and I need to make wings that are at least twice as large as it allows. -
Nope. Not using quantum struts. http://cloud-4.steamusercontent.com/ugc/541887967032441105/0B65859752DBCF997EE88BF3C8AA301A30405CF6/ Mods list http://cloud-4.steamusercontent.com/ugc/541887967032445668/BE40A475F9823AB7A4BD7F471A71970257BA023F/ well the winch lowers and such.. I should have noted that when I "decouple node" on the docking port, the physics work fine and they fall to the ground. If I quicksave and load it so they redock, it's stuck in place again at that new location.
-
http://cloud-4.steamusercontent.com/ugc/541887967031371337/568487ECCAB2A2ADF2319B86D512CA30299648EE/ I have two vehicles docked together. When they are apart, they operate fine. The legs and wheels part will drive around and flip over as expected. The skycrane part will fly around, so on. But when I dock them together in the VAB, and launch it, it's anchored to the sky like this. The legs fold up, and it just stays there. It will wobble around from the reaction wheels but it won't spin and or flip, it is like something is a sky kraken it around its center of mass. pls halp
-
[1.2.2] B9 Aerospace | Release 6.2.1 (Old Thread)
innociv replied to bac9's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
I get really really horrible lag using the Sabre engines past 10km and at super/hyper sonic speed. I have an i5-2500k and 7970, and I drop down to like 5 fps and it freezes for 0.5-1 second every 1-2 seconds. I get 60FPS just fine even when I'm using 24 rapier engines, compared to 4 Sabres.- 4,460 replies
-
How do you do rotating VTOL engines?
innociv replied to innociv's topic in KSP1 Gameplay Questions and Tutorials
The rotating IR part is what is wobbling. The attachment point is fine. -
How do you do rotating VTOL engines?
innociv replied to innociv's topic in KSP1 Gameplay Questions and Tutorials
Even without rotating them, just loading the plane and it sitting on the runway has them wobbling for a while until they settle down. -
How do you do rotating VTOL engines?
innociv posted a topic in KSP1 Gameplay Questions and Tutorials
I'm using IR, but the rotating/pivoting mounts, including the VTOL rotor, wobble too much to use them, at least with large engines attached. -
Offsets seem to be very messed up against as of 1.50. It's hard to describe but, it's easy to reproduce. Just scale things up, try to attach things to them and use offsets and they jump all over each click. Even if you attach something smaller to a larger thing via the center node, just trying to move it once with offset makes it snap over to the side off from the center.
-
[0.90] Procedural Dynamics - Procedural Wing 0.9.3 Dec 24
innociv replied to DYJ's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
The offset and being able to do more fine rotations is a huge plus with procedural wings. I do really wish that when you add one wing to another, you aren't forced to have the same exact "root" size, too. -
[0.90] Procedural Dynamics - Procedural Wing 0.9.3 Dec 24
innociv replied to DYJ's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
There seems to be a major bug with that 0.90 dll and I'm not sure how to describe it. It might have to do with trying to attach to offset parts. I set a wing, size it, etc. Then I set another wing near by, size it, then try and pick it up and attach it again on the other wing that's offset, and all parts become unresponsive and I have to reload it. Or.. yeah just in general you can't remove a wing from some place then reattach it to another wing, at least not an offset one. -
The issue with moving offsets on scaled parts isn't fixed - but it's better than it was before. It just reverts back when you click a bit a bit off from where it was instead of way off. I've also been seeing that core reverting to another size on its own as well. Though for me its reverted to the smallest size.
-
[1.3.1] Ferram Aerospace Research: v0.15.9.1 "Liepmann" 4/2/18
innociv replied to ferram4's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
Ah. I was trying to put in 22000 km instead of meters. So doing that causes that bug.- 14,073 replies
-
- aerodynamics
- ferram aerospace research
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
[1.3.1] Ferram Aerospace Research: v0.15.9.1 "Liepmann" 4/2/18
innociv replied to ferram4's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
When I use the FAR Analysis in VAB, and input an altitude and mach in Data+Stability Derivatives, the window becomes blank except for a bunch of overlapping text in the upper left corner. Are others having the same problem? Else I can look for a conflict with other mods. I also have two FAR icons in the VAB. I deleted my whole GameData folder before updating to 0.90 so there isn't an old version there or anything.- 14,073 replies
-
- aerodynamics
- ferram aerospace research
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
This mod should be stock. It's insanely good and just a must have. I'm not complaining, I'm just letting you know how much I love it.
-
[0.90] Stack Inline Lights 0.7 [update 07/04/2015]]
innociv replied to alexustas's topic in KSP1 Mod Development
This is a really beautiful part. I wish it better worked with newer versions.