Jump to content

Tidal Stream

Members
  • Posts

    40
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

33 Excellent

Contact Methods

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. @jrodriguez I second that, the Realism Overhaul fork is the successor of my fork, and everyone should use that one.
  2. Hello! I am glad that the Procedural Parts community is still active. As I wrote before, I don't have time for KSP any more. I will merge whale2's pull request so this should fix rerooting problems. ozraven's patch looks hacky so I am unsure about that one yet. Realism Overhaul (RP-0 at least) is still relying on Procedural Parts so they can take over if needed. And if someone has the time for full-time fixing of Procedural Parts, go ahead but make sure it doesn't break things, especially for RO.
  3. Good contribution, whale_2! If you manage to fix the regression that steddyj reported I will merge it. I think it could be from line 1498.
  4. @steddyj I have not responded because there is nothing I can do as I don't play KSP any more. If someone manages to fix this, either fork the repository or submit a pull request, it is open source.
  5. @zer0Kerbal Stock does not use these fuels unless I have missed it in an update, and mods adding fuels usually have to add procedural parts configs as well. Realism Overhaul does it for example, you can check how they do it. This is entirely config-side matter, no need for anything compiled or included in the base mod to be changed.
  6. 1.2.18 is both for 1.3.1 and for 1.4+. However, CKAN has a problem with versions being newer but with a lower version number so I bumped it to 1.3.18. And if I have to diverge KSP 1.3.1 and 1.4+ branches because of a 1.4+ bug again, I would be unable to use the 1.2.x versions because of it without pulling them from CKAN, so it better not happens.
  7. @PadroneI am not sure. The code doing that should be this one. It does not check for default textures specifically.
  8. What I suggest is to use a module manager that is FOR: ProceduralParts and Snacks, and use +Part to create a custom procedural tank.
  9. Here is a pre-release that should work both on 1.4 and 1.5. https://github.com/Tidal-Stream/ProceduralParts/releases/tag/v1.3.16.1a
  10. If you have no issues, I can do and release a build where I marked it as supporting both 1.4 and 1.5.
  11. @AntstarNo, this is a common RealismOverhaul KER issue. Remove the crew and you will not see the mass increase. This is just VAB/SPH problem, in-flight the mass is correct. @OwariThis is USI problem, not ProceduralParts one. @Citizen247You have to figure out the formula of the oval cross-section, then instead of the loop going around the circle, you will have a loop that picks the next point in the oval. For regular polygons you could choose n points, then every iteration of the loop you go along the sides and corners of it.
  12. Can you provide a screenshot? Optionally create a github issue with this description and screenshot because things can be hard to find in a long thread in the future when someone tries fixing these bugs.
  13. What is going on is that no one so far has figured out how to balance and cost them for RP-0, placing them in the correct nodes and them costing sensible amount of funds. If you want to do that, feel free to submit a patch (pull request) to the RP-0 GitHub repository.
  14. CKAN installs 0.3.23.1 for KSP 1.3.1 but on loading it gives a warning that it was built for 1.4.1. Usually these warnings are for earlier versions (1.2.2, 1.3) so I ignore them but 1.4.1 is later. I do not see problems so far but I thought it would be good to note this.
×
×
  • Create New...