Jump to content

TheTripleAce3

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    214

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by TheTripleAce3

  1. TheTripleAce3
    So the second wing is aerodynamically useless but probably serves some structural use?
  2. TheTripleAce3
    Is there a name for that wing design or would it be a modified box wing?
  3. TheTripleAce3
    +1 Yep.
  4. TheTripleAce3
    If KSP ever requires an internet connection then I'll be helically wrapped around an axis.
  5. TheTripleAce3
    My internet is garbo.
  6. TheTripleAce3
    I couldn't watch bc you were streaming live
  7. TheTripleAce3
    Is that just a bunch of subassemblies that can be combined into one massive design?
  8. TheTripleAce3
    That's a normal test flight for my liason craft.
  9. TheTripleAce3
    Gonna have to agree here just on aesthetic.
  10. TheTripleAce3
    I see the struts but I'm kinda weirded out by thinking about how struts would actually work at mach speeds And god point about the outboard gear.
  11. TheTripleAce3
    Those gears are going to be floating in flight and look completely independent of the wings and nose
  12. TheTripleAce3
    Ah, then the wings have 60% of the fuel.. consider adding some gear in the wings bc they'd be the first things to fall off then >.>
  13. TheTripleAce3
    How many Mk 3 fuel fuselages did you use? Those hold something like 10k LF a pop w/o tweakscale
  14. TheTripleAce3
    Meh. That's only 6% of the fuel tbh. It could be much more unfair. Although seeing 60k and thinking "only" at the same time is an interesting realization.
  15. TheTripleAce3
    Oh. Is it required for reviews? I may have been looking at that section then XD Sorry about that. One million units of fuel? O_o Impressive. And with the most efficient engines in the game (at least by ISP alone)
  16. TheTripleAce3
    Then go with max range for the listed one I guess. Then you can find the max range (in theory I guess?) And imo, the best way to measure a plane's performance is seeing the difference from flying at its best to at its worst, probably not the way to go about it, but it works for my stuff
  17. TheTripleAce3
    And it would spend probably 1/3 of that 20 year lifespan inside a hangar getting that cleaning. And you forgot to add some info to your pitch. Range, fuel cap, etc are needed
  18. TheTripleAce3
    Something that big would have so much maintenance cost it makes the Wunderwaffe blush...
  19. TheTripleAce3
    It'd still take a hundred or so flights to pay off the plane assuming 0 maintenance fees wouldn't it? assuming standard ny-paris flight costs at least
  20. TheTripleAce3
    F-4s are pretty loud too. Found that out the hard way at EAA Airventure.
  21. TheTripleAce3
    That's if we don't have someone go reverse order in this one for a few planes
  22. TheTripleAce3
    It also means I just woke up
  23. TheTripleAce3
    .... I honestly thought you managed to land it in there rather than taxi it in..
  24. TheTripleAce3
    Not exactly possible for me atm.
  25. TheTripleAce3
    I want to make a plane irl that does this now
×
×
  • Create New...