Jump to content

Superluminal Gremlin

Members
  • Posts

    313
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Superluminal Gremlin

  1. 3 hours ago, Bej Kerman said:

    I want them to last for as long as an explosion should last

    Yep. Most certainly :)

     

     

    3 hours ago, Bej Kerman said:

    The straight line where the explosion meets the ground says otherwise

    Isn't the ground flat? You might be right, but from this angle, I find it hard to tell the difference.

  2. 2 hours ago, mcwaffles2003 said:

    Have devs ever made wikis?

    I mean they havnt

     but I was referring to people sorta/semi involved with the games production. I was a little ambiguous there.

     

     

    Ok. I didn’t know that most sequels are like in the same area as the originals wiki. I don’t lay many sequels so I have never really had reason to go look.

    So for ksp 2, it will be a community made wiki, in the same page as ksp? Got it. They really should try make it a little more aesthetically pleasing tho. But if it’s in the same place, there’s a chance people could get confused between the original and the sequel.

  3. That's a cool idea. That should be part a part of the game, and definitely a mod, but i was talking about more like on off-game wiki that can store much more detailed information, like the ksp-wiki. 

    The main question is, who's making it. Us(the community) or them(The devs)?

  4. With KSP 2 coming out very soon, many players (I assume) are going to want access to  all the technical data while not on the game, or for a much more in-depth review of each and very part, planet and all the juicy detail, there's going to need to be a wiki to compile the at first, normal, then much larger amount of data which will flow in from players. 

     

    The question is. Has there already been a discussion about forming and creating a site. Will this be created by the KSP 2 creators or by the community?

    Will there be community creators willing to use there workstations, or pay the cost of hosting the site.  

    What is the technical side to hosting a website, all the server side problems (I have done some basic front end stuff, but not to much back-end).

    Could the KSP/2 community do it, or will we leave it for someone else?

     

    If there has already been a thread/discussion about this, then sorry:(

  5. Ground Scatter - Good

    Clouds - Yes

    Parts surviving the explosions. Some big balls on that rocket. Fuel tanks maybe?

    KSP 2 is looking so much better than one has ever (excluding mods. But no mods have made realistic explosions, i think)

    Love it. Next photo ;)

     

  6. Actually, how this rocket crashed, to the best of my knowledge, was because 3 of the 6 gyros (I think), where inverted because they were put in the wrong way :0 Such a great meme.

    The poor Proton has always had reliability issues, unlike the actual proton, with a estimated lifespan of at least 10^30 years.

     

     

  7. I've read it as well, and its very insightful to the Challenger disaster because of the failure of NASA to comprehend the SRB cold sealing issue.

     

    Its interesting, because in the book, Mike was coming close to losing his job over the deal with burning the OMS engines on the ascent to "put another zero behind the already conservative figures of the safety of africans" or something close to that effect. However, Young really did care about the astronauts, and was very involved in the safety of the shuttle. As in this alternate timeline, i feel as if the challenger disaster wont happen because instead of having a bureaucrat in power, we have an astronaut. Someone who knew the risks of spaceflight. This is pretty smart way of avoiding having to (maybe) kill of 7 kerbals. Very creative.

×
×
  • Create New...