He said he wouldn\'t believe them if they \'produced all the evidence in the world\'. I didn\'t say anything about not having a logical level of scepticism about the claims, my problem is simply with Capt\'n\'s automatic and apparently unshakable government=LIES position. I didn\'t mention the (farcical, as always) loss-of-revenue calculations, I simply have no reason to assume that they\'re outright manufacturing direct evidence, in the form of the e-mails. EDIT: After all, this would be criminal perjury. Where\'s your assumption of innocence there?