um3k

It's a game. You play it for fun. If you get tired of it, stop playing. There's nothing wrong with that.

I am just going to leave this here:

At first I was indifferent to female Kerbals, but Sirrobert, _Aramchek_, and sanoj688's arguments have swayed my opinion. I now strongly support the addition of female Kerbals, implemented similarly to the image in the OP. In addition, I find it interesting that some of the most vocal people in this thread are the ones who claim not to care about the subject matter. For reference, people who truly don't care about a thing generally do not attempt to win an argument about said thing.

Have you considered the possibility that your monitor is what needs adjusting?

Falling from space and landing on your head is often a "flight you can walk away from" for a Kerbal.

Just add some female names to the name generator.

In 0.23, you can use a Kerbal to transport data. So you could get the data out of the SSTO, recover the Kerbal, then send another Kerbal (or the same one again) using a capsule and perhaps a vehicle on the launch pad. But, yeah, what you suggest wouldn't be a bad feature. Then again, are you refueling your SSTO on the surface? If not, then you'll only be able to use it so many times, might as well recover and relaunch it, just call it "maintenance" to appease yourself. Ninja'd...

That vote was unofficial, Moon Goddess.

Yeah, the actual computation required for simulating the orbits of the planets and moons themselves is trivial for modern computers, even with a spacecraft being simulated at the same time. The real issue would be, as mentioned, the inherent instability of the Kerbal solar system.

My first Munar mission of 0.20, and possibly my first ever successful/attempted Munar round trip. Can't even remember at this point. Click for full Imgur gallery.

Clearly, this calls for a larger payload.

Here's something of a carrier. <iframe class="imgur-album" width="100%" height="550" frameborder="0" src="http://imgur.com/a/h8sfC/embed"></iframe>

I find the MechJeb pod decoupler works well for the underside of rovers, the lower profile gives better ground clearance.

The devs have already made it clear that KSP is not a war simulator, so the only chance of that happening is with an extremely flexible modding system.

DYJ has already rejected the idea of making an IVA for the Crewtank. I attempted making one, but currently there is a bug that causes non-command capsule IVAs to be positioned very incorrectly and impossible to align. So, a fully featured (i.e. windows) Crewtank IVA will have to wait for a KSP update.