raziel420
Members-
Posts
38 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation
0 NeutralProfile Information
-
About me
Rocketeer
-
It seems that kerbalstuff is having some difficulties today, I've been having issues getting many mods to update since the primary location is kerbalstuff. Any fallback systems in place (IE auto selection of alternate download locations)? Would that be a feature that would need to be officially requested (and possibly difficult to implement)?
-
I saw on the download site that you guys are just finishing up paperwork for the new edition of b9 before the official release. Thank you for all your hard work in bringing this fantastic mod back in all of it's glory. Side note, the HX endpieces would make for fairly awesome control pods/ bridges with little work
-
Awesome, this is a fantastic addition to karbonite, and SCANsat. The orange beach balls were not exactly helpfull, but this should make landing in good areas much much more simple. Might I suggest adding in AVC (Automatic Version Checker) compatability, specially if it's still under active development?
-
[1.12.x] Freight Transport Technologies [v0.6.0]
raziel420 replied to RoverDude's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
Ignore the throttle control guy, your problem is inbalanced fuel, TAC fuel balancer worked for me, but there are other options. Mentioned it to RoverDude this morning on the IRC he suggested creative fuel lines -
[1.0.4] BoxSat vA.02f - Updated 09/16/2015
raziel420 replied to DasPenguin85's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
Would be awesome if the RCS thrusters would flush mount in the corners (instead of getting the little boxes tacked on wherever you place them) -
A few pages back they had the s2 tank piece which instead of the 4 different models (rcs/lfo/liquidfuel/fusealage) they combined them into one piece with a button to switch the modes in the assembly buildings. So while the pieces are all "there" they might not work the same (or have been combined into a different piece)
-
admin building, now adding RED TAPE, so you can sift through the same bureaucratic nightmare NASA has to deal with!!!!
-
Devnote Tuesdays: The "Can't Spell Kerbal without K" Edition
raziel420 replied to SQUAD's topic in KSP1 The Daily Kerbal
Probe IVA's -
$600 a day is WAY to much to be paying them, quick look at nasa website shows that the pay is closer to 60k a year. http://astronauts.nasa.gov/content/faq.htm They get paid on the goverment scale between GS-11 and GS-14 which translates to $64k - $141K a year, your paying them almost double the peak pay. 600 * 365 = 219,000 Closer to realistic would be $175-386 a day
-
Devnote Tuesdays: The "Goodbye, Hugo" Edition
raziel420 replied to SQUAD's topic in KSP1 The Daily Kerbal
short answer HYPE TRAIN CHOOOO CHOOO!!!!!!!! On the other hand, wasn't really expecting to get picked as a tester, but after seeing the number of applicants, i'm pretty sure i'm going to end up somewhere in the middle 1/3 of that. -
I know one of the "kracken" bugs is due to rounding errors in unity. I found an idle game that I've been playing for a few weeks, which involves some very very large numbers and is coded in Unity. Then I got to wondering, if they can keep numbers this large in unity, how, and would they be willing to share that information with Squad. The name of the game is AdVenture Capitalist, and it can be found here on Kongregate.
-
[24.2] Karbonite Ongoing Dev and Discussion
raziel420 replied to RoverDude's topic in KSP1 Mod Development
I think karbonite is perfect, consider it a heavy hydrocabon molecule, possibly with it's own oxygen bonds making it prefect for most fuels (with some refining) with oxy as an extra exhaust output. Could use any number of different hydrocarbon chain sections for a variety of things, plastics, generators (natural gas), refine it to RP-1 (kerosene), or start some serious cracking for hydrogen, could even use the leftover carbon to make "diamond" glass. -
[0.24.2] Taverio's Pizza and Aerospace v1.7.1 (22/09)
raziel420 replied to Taverius's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
Like i said it was going to be developed into the RMA-1 but they lost the bids for the yf120 engine, but they did get the contract for a different branch of development the f136 engine. Although I did find a research paper on it. http://www.ecosimpro.com/download/articles/VKI.Modelling_and_Simulation_of_the_Revolutionary_Turbine_Accelerator.pdf