[What can counter Laser weapons?]

But did you read the rest?

What IS your claim, after all? That Einstein and everyone else were wrong?

[What can counter Laser weapons?]

Are you seriously arguing that you can't have two variables with the same value?

Just moments ago, he was calling Einstein an idiot, I think anything goes in this thread.

[What can counter Laser weapons?]

The Dunning-Kruger is strong with this one.

[What can counter Laser weapons?]

Any proof of the warping of space-time? You can't just pull an Einstein (IE say Quantum Entanglement is like a pair of gloves, etc.)

All the circled objects are actually the same, results of gravity bending spacetime. At this point I just can't tell if you're just trolling, or you really doubt basically all Physics from the last 90 years.

[What can counter Laser weapons?]

You said:

Electromagnetic fields.

Why?

Because if you can alter the laser's path enough, you could essentially dodge it by activating the field. Earth's field already renders lasers a pretty much useless weapon

So far, you're the one putting a claim, and failed to provide any source, while evading questions and diverting attention on the last page with high school questions. To me, and to anyone who might be reading the discussion, it seems that you don't know what you're talking about.

[Nasa's SpotTheStation]

Because the US are the only nation on this planet ... owait. The US encompass merely 4.5% of the worlds population on 6.4% of the total land area.

You're German, right? Why would you fear an American agency that much?

[Delta-V of an ICBM]

Depends on what you put on it.

Nuclear missile Dv: Absolutely no clue, nor do I want or need to know.

ICBM converted into a launch vehicle: enough to get to the moon.

Unless you are talking about the warp drive-capable Phoenix from Star Trek, I don't think any ICBM has the capacity to go to the Moon.

[Metric System Rewrite]

I am not sure what a liter is other than the American spelling of litre

Probably one of these things, when misspelled:

[The "You know you're playing a lot of KSP when..." thread]

I know but what is it exactly?

The amount of speed you would gain in vacuum, if you burned a certain quantity of fuel with a certain specific impulse.

[Reforming the Educational System]

Assuming you mean Russia? The Soviet Union hasn't existed for about 20 years.

Why do you assume all educational reforms must have necessarially been made less than 20 years ago?

[There must be something unknown in physics that makes consciousness exist]

Are you saying that there's something special that separates us from computers? What exactly?

[How does Danny2462 do it?]

These are definitely Solid Rocket Boosters:

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

[How does Danny2462 do it?]

You don't need to throttle up SRBs. Once started, they burn until the fuel ends.

[Infinite Energy Idea]

Sadly, they do, as they do with any other "magical device". The purpose of a patent office is not to test stuff, but to receive the papers and register a patent. The functionality of the patents is not tested, and neither is the possibility of copying someone else's design. That's why you see so many crooked and stolen ideas every time patent fairs are opened. People brag about the stuff some engineer from NASA made decades ago, they brag about the devices that supposedly detect fields that science does not acknowledge... It's sad, but that's the reality.

Well, they shouldn't. At least in the US or the UK.

[Another Thread On Flag Stupidity]

Why does it matter? At all?

If you're trying to take a screenshot, but your flag is the wrong way, just take the screenie from the other side. That's the only way I can see this affecting the game at all, and it's stupidly simple to solve.

1 - Some people have text on the flag, so turning it doesn't solve it

2 - It also doesn't help if the flag is exactly perpendicular to the direction you wanted to plant.

[Is KSP for Older Users?]

I must be the exception that proves the rule then

(Then again, I do have a mental disorder the Issac Newton and Albert enstin had, and my IQ is 138+.) anyway, no stereotypes please

Now I'm wondering if that mistake was intentional, and if that mental disorder was dyslexia.

[a kerbal to deploy the solar panels of another ship when the battery is dead]

Yeah you have to be in EVA though, I think that's where the conflicting answers are coming from

How would a kerbal manually open a solar panel without EVA?

-edit- Now I remembered something: didn't the launching pad generate energy, so that probes wouldn't die while waiting for a window? Did you try testing this outside of the launching pad?

[New player needs help with a Shuttle]

The images you posted are not direct links. When using IMG tags, check if the extension is correct (for example .gif)

Here are they, in order:

As for your questions, I have no idea.

[Stupidity vs Intelligence]

No,I remember I have read(don't ask me for the source,I forgot it)that the courage was determining how a kerbal would react to the danger,the stupidity woul determine the "capability" of the kerbal of detecting the danger.The Badass flag was determining if the kerbal would be excited by the danger.

Don't quote me on that,it's just something I recall and I don't even remember the source.

I think I saw something like this on the first post HarvesterR made on the Orbiter forums about KSP. Don't remember where exactly it is, but someone posted it here a time ago.

[I found Jeb Kerman's Junkyard And Spaceship Factory IRL]

I modified the logo a little to make some flags.

Handwritten:

Using same font:

[Fame or time on the Moon: What would you want more?]

What bugs me is that Neil and Buzz traveled 400,000 km and landed on the moon together in the same ship, yet Neil is the "first" man on the moon. Apparently standing in a ship that's landed on the moon, is not being "on" the moon. Whatever. I guess I'm not on Earth whenever I get in a car. Semantics.

Well, at least Wikipedia says he is the "first person to walk on the Moon", which he was. Some people say "first to step on the Moon", which is also correct.

[How can I attach an object to a control surface]

The Wiki has a page about cfg files:

http://wiki.kerbalspaceprogram.com/wiki/CFG_File_Documentation#Parts

The module is the "category" of the part. In this case, it's a control surface (aileron etc)

[Beautiful KSP Background]

You mean, like this?

[Quick save duration]

As far as I know, the quicksave is permanent. It is stored on the same folder as the persistent save, "saves\(username)\quicksave.sfs"

[What would be the easiest way to OBLITERATE THE ENTIRE PLANET?]

Obliterate the entire planet:

1) remove all satellites from orbit (when in doubt, nuke em and shoot em off into the sun!)

2) place as many large heavy objects in sun-stationary orbit along the prograde terminator as possible.

3) wait several thousand years as the satellites' gravity accelerates earth's orbit into the asteroid belt.

4) whitness large space rocks obliterating the planet.

5) eat cake.

I don't think that this method would be very efficient... better put the rockets directly on Earth.