Brenok
-
Posts
107 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Developer Articles
KSP2 Release Notes
Bug Reports
Posts posted by Brenok
-
-
3) Guys, stop with the religion bashing and stuff. Not cool. You just sound like one of those dicks that take every opportunity to turn an otherwise benign discussion into a political outhouse ragefest, and honestly you just come off as an insecure person.
Are you sure you're replying to the right thread? Where do you see religion bashing?
-
Paralel thread, to mantain them connected.
I discovered KSP from xkcd, too.
-
I just realized that the ribbon generator has a really good selection of craft types which should be in the stock game:
And which, incidentally, doesn't include "satellite"
-
Maybe try using Alt-F12 to bring the cheats and use "hack gravity" and "infinite fuel"? Then you could attach some small rockets and fly quickly.
What kind of bug are you experiencing that could only be tested on a mountain?
-
Minmus orbits Kerbin
So if anything were to happen to Kerbin, who knows what would happen to Minmus
So I guess Laythe is a better "best bet" in a real scenario in that regard.
What could this "anything" be? Giant asteroid? It would probably take an asteroid larger than Kerbin itself to mess with the orbit of Minmus.
-
After reading you post, I got the idea that you believe plants are someway sentient or intelligent. Is this correct?
If so, I don't think it is true. You don't need any form of consciousness to mutate or evolve.
-
Then we should all YOLO and fall off a bridge! xD
...do you know what "YOLO" means?
-
@magnemoe: Please allow me to paraphrase your response:
800 years is a serious long time. It is safe to say that the available technology for dealing with climate change will improve over the next 100 years. In 400 years, I guess climate change will be a non issue. Add that nuclear energy is the only really practical way that we currently have of offsetting CO2 emissions, but public concern over that technology prevents us from using it. Let's just do nothing an leave it to future generations to solve the problem.
Thank you for helping Nibb and I make our point.
But global warming is gradual, and much more short-term. We can already feel its effects now, and it could get much worse on the next 50/100 years.
The meteor, even if it would hit Earth in 800 years, would do no harm to us now. In 100 years, it would do no harm. In 500, 600, 700 years, we probably wouldn't feel its consequences. Even if it took 100 years to mount an expedition and deflect the asteroid, it wouldn't be unreasonable to wait a bit more for better (and more reliable) technology.
-
I don't quite understand what you're proposing. Why would you want for distant RCS thrusters to get less thrust?
-
In any case, I think the main problem is evaporation. If you want the black hole to last 1 milisecond it must have 23 tons of mass. And a black hole with that mass would have 3*10^-23 radius.
-
If the black hole was small enough and went directly down, it would pass throught the core and exit at the same speed it entered.
-
Anyway, there's still the problem that fusion itself is very brief. The atoms collide, fuse, liberate energy and immediatly break up. I don't think someone could make a black hole on something similar to a fusion reactor.
-
I'll say as a disclaimer that I'm not a trained physicist either, but anyway:
Surprisingly... not really that far out of our grasp, we already know that the LHC is capable of producing black holes not even remotely strong enough to destroy anything at all mind you, and they dissipate so fast that it's as if they were never there, but that's not all we know for a fact that we can use magnetic fields to crush matter together to fuse, so all we really need is a massively scaled up Fusion reactor(like this)
The problem with Tokamak fusion reactors like this is that, as far as I know, they fuse particles by making them very fast, and colliding one on another, so it would be difficult to contain. And they're one-on-one collisions, which immediatly dissolve.
-
IT has this tag because you know, no one is gonna attempt that, and it doesn't really fit under any other tag.
Well, then the answer would probably be just "it's impossible with current technology"
-
I think that breaks the purpose of what OP meant, I think it's goal is more to know how we could destroy the planet with our current technology.
Given the "Sci Fi Theory" topic, more like "not-so-current" technology.
-
Talking about earthly elements makes no sense, because KSP has its own unique elements, as shown in the upcoming fuel cycle scheme.
-
Usually, rates of change are represented by a lowercase "d", like in d/dx. Delta (ÃŽâ€) almost always refers to a simple difference (not a difference in change, whatever this means)
-
Try switching to docking controls on the bottom left. That makes
W-Front / S-Back
A-Left / D-Right
Shift - Up / Ctrl - Down
And I believe it is that way to match the pitch commands. When you press "W", you usually move the ship "down"
-
Pretty cool to see so many younger teenagers interested in this game. I had to stop for a minute to think if I would have been interested in this when I was 13, then I remembered the ungodly number of hours I spent trying to master this game at about that age. Any of the other fogies remember that one?
Wow, that game is quite impressive, specially for the Atari.
The thing that buga me is that Skylab-like station, which had already been deorbited when the Shuttle started. Or is it a fictional station?
-
I don't see how he's an astrophysicist in any way, I can spot numerous problems in his videos and I don't claim to be even close to an astrophysicist. He's just above layman level.
Could you be more specific? I saw some of Manley's videos but weren't particularly observant.
-
The legends say that far away, exists a system with eight planets and hundreds of moons. Mars would be one of the formers. Actually it's quite similar to Duna...
-
That certainly looks like a better first flight than most youtubers
-
Were they supposed to be famous or something?
-
I don't know exactly the answer but I'm quite sure it just need some simple calculus and the rocket equation, not a math degree. I could always be wrong, though.
I will try to write an answer as soon as I find the information, and if nobody answers until then.
Questions about rocket equations (ISP, exhaust velocity, and T/W ratios)
in Science & Spaceflight
Posted · Edited by Brenok
Scott Manley has a video about the gravitational acceleration in ISP equatons:
Basically, the g is only there to allow people to use both imperial and metrical. It doesn't matter what the local gravity actually is.