Jump to content

dimovski

Members
  • Posts

    633
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by dimovski

  1. Hello Beale, love the trusses!

    After a 2-month long repair my laptop is finally ready to run KSP, so I did a fresh 1.3 install (quite a jump from 0.90, isn't it?) and downloaded Tantares. I hope that You will find the patience to help me with a question or two I've got:

    1)I've noticed that the topmost conical part of the Salyut doesn't perfectly fit any of Your docking ports. Am I missing a part between the conical section and the docking port or was this intended and supposed to look like that?

    2)Could You give me a run-down of the different docking rings and sizes and their historical counterparts? I'm a bit lost, really :(. Apropos, may I ask what the purpose of two different Soyuz orbital modules is? Again, do excuse my ignorance.

     

    Thanks for reading and sorry for bothering You.

  2. IMO, TMK around 2-3 weeks before the 100th anniversary of the October Revolution would be perfect!

    Would You consider adding satellite-greeble to the 2019 wishlist?

    Something like the funny cages on the Dnepropetrovsk Sputnik series:

    ds-mg__cos-26__1.jpg

    Or the studded thingies on the Ekran series:

    ekran-m__1.jpg

    The RD-0410 I think is unnecessary, if they were serious about it they would've gone nuclear electric or revived some older designs like RD-403 and -404... Or the RD-600 :P

  3. Hello everyone,

     

    I spent a couple of hours yesterday searching for a Goddard problem solver which could be used for KSP RSS. Sadly, both POST and OTIS are under ITAR, Quickshot apparently costs a fortune...

    However, I did find 2 programs which could be used. It's just that I'm a wee bit too inept to make them work :(

     

    First I tried using ZOOM - it looks very promising (even the Falcon 9 launch & landing are simulated in one of the default scenarios!), but I can't for the life of me figure out why this happens:

    6e8WeL1.jpg

    Does anyone know why?

     

    After that failure, I searched some more and found OpenGoddard - however, I appear to be far too dumb to code a program which would make use of this Python module.

     

    Has anybody found some other Goddard problem solvers?

  4. 1 hour ago, Legcutter said:

    Since I'm convinced that refferring to russian (or any) Wikipedia is not a gentelman's way, here:

    Progress and Progress-M

    Whilst Astronautix may be vastly better than Wikipedia in some regards, it has its fair share of problems, too. E.g. the N-IM 1965 has in its description an engine upgrade to 250 tons of thrust, whilst giving around 2800kN of thrust per engine.

    However, Beale's source may have suffered from a double-typo - 8 before the 4 & 9 instead of 8... :P

  5. On 16. 04. 2017. at 11:01 PM, hraban said:

    Two or three reports on the subject of POLYUS are not enough to carry on the controversial project. The alternative possibilities of use are too limited and a weapon-technical use is not a question for Contares.

    Proposals for the alternative use of POLJUS in the sense of peaceful use are welcome.

    I'm sorry if I missed this... You know - Polyus - mouth-open & all that jazz!

     

    Machst 'nen prima Job, wäre wirklich 'ne Schande wenn so ein schönes 3D-Modell nicht seinen Weg in dieses Spiel finden würde :(

  6. 5 hours ago, NeoFatalis said:

    What about standalone engines?, for example a single nk33 (we have block G engine but it has a 1.875 base), the Proton engines or even the RD105 (which is basically a single chamber rd107)

    @NeoFatalis 

    8 hours ago, Rory Yammomoto said:

    Any chance that we'll get to manually put the engines on the N-1 upper stages ourselves? it would be nice to put bigger engines on the N-11 and N-111, or better yet, use the upper stage engines in other craft.

    @Rory Yammamoto

    In the meantime, I would suggest downloading the OLDD N-I parts pack for this purpose. The parts are nearly in line with Beale's, and in the years I've used them these 20 or so parts were more than capable to simulate everything from a 200kg to 400ton LV, completely fulfilling my needs for Soviet-style launchers.

     

  7. Dir auch 'nen guten Rutsch ;)

     

    What I'd really look forward to, and one of the rare things I've got the audacity to request... I'd really LOVE to see some frequently-launched satellite buses "contarized". Like the KAUR-1 (https://i.ytimg.com/vi/qpzfNOyr45g/hqdefault.jpg) and Meteor-1 (http://www.satflare.com/news/n3835/meteor-1-1.jpg). Those were launched rather frequently on lots of different missions, and I assume that they would add a lot of flavour to playing with Tantares+Contares.

×
×
  • Create New...