Jump to content

Sir Nahme

Members
  • Posts

    357
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Sir Nahme

  1. It's not a crime to disagree. It is however unacceptable to express it in a manner than is not concurrent with civil behavior. Your original post in question was fairly civil but people are over sensitive right now. some of your concurrent posts have been outright antagonistic, even after you edited them, so I'd conclude that you too are over sensitive regarding this subject.
  2. announcement in the announcement forum
  3. of course, but why would you calculate the weight when you already HAVE the mass to calculate energy density?
  4. Note entirely true, we know the dry mass/full mass, not the weight
  5. you'd still be better off determining that by mass, it's a better format because you can covert to energy density
  6. Yeah I have to second the determination of volume being irrelevant. Determination of mass for one unit of fuel is far more important
  7. It would be an improvment! Minecraft needs MOAR SRB'S!
  8. The last dev blog with status on the update was posted 5 days ago, the last dev post in the developer forums regarding planned fixes was posted yesterday. The foundation of your statement is flawed and your delivery is lacking.
  9. How about context of the question answered? Don't try and drag my statement out and turn it into something it was not for your own unfulfilled angst. Your interpretation of Damion's posts are an artifact of you're own mind and were not the subject of my post.
  10. Problem being that if we as a community could agree on anything we wouldn't NEED a manager or moderators
  11. NDA, Terms of Termination, Cause of Termination, Professionalism. There are more, need I continue? Clearly you have never worked in public relations or in a professional environment.
  12. Because there are social, legal and other timing factors required to take into consideration for the spreading of accurate information? Settle down, they will tell us what we need to know when they have a cogent statement to make.
  13. I choose to believe he's teasing us because the patch is coming in the next week that will invalidate everything
  14. then click on either of their profiles and look at their activity yourself
  15. Harvester and C7 are still posting info and support in the developers section. I wouldn't get too worked up
  16. http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/showthread.php/17691-Dev-Blogs no
  17. clear your cache edit: nevermind, see you already did that, now im stumped... just got out of bed, reading comprehension fail
  18. I start getting slow down at 350 parts. I hit 3 fps at 788
  19. games been simulating just fine for me alt tabbed in full screen, that's how I've been kethane mapping the mun and minmus
  20. My latest 752 part monstrosity designed to drop 8 rovers on the mun, it was futureproofed for minmus missions as well with any luck... I present operation Rover Rain edit: woops two failed launches, forgot the launch stabalisers first go and kraken got it at 400m next shot, added moar struts, successful orbit at 788 pieces and 3 frames per second lol
  21. I will finally be able to stop leaving "beacon" rovers all over the place lol
  22. I would adore said feature. Seriously sometimes I just want to know how big my rocket is too
×
×
  • Create New...