-
Posts
7,201 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Developer Articles
KSP2 Release Notes
Everything posted by CatastrophicFailure
-
totm nov 2023 SpaceX Discussion Thread
CatastrophicFailure replied to Skylon's topic in Science & Spaceflight
-
RP-1 Realistic Progression One for KSP 1.12.3
CatastrophicFailure replied to pap1723's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
Thanks guys, a manual install did work and seems not to have broken anything. So as a token, have this eye-watering unholy lovechild of Chamberlin and Chelomei. -
totm dec 2019 Russian Launch and Mission Thread
CatastrophicFailure replied to tater's topic in Science & Spaceflight
ULA hired themselves a new sniper… -
totm nov 2023 SpaceX Discussion Thread
CatastrophicFailure replied to Skylon's topic in Science & Spaceflight
Doesn’t help that pretty much every Saturn V video ever is in slo-mo… Can’t find it again but I saw a tweet the other day of some hardware at the launch site labeled FLAME DIVERTER or similar, but looked like deluge tubing. Take w/ a grain o salt. Tho a giant tungsten slab would be pretty awesome in general. -
totm nov 2023 SpaceX Discussion Thread
CatastrophicFailure replied to Skylon's topic in Science & Spaceflight
Of course. Gwynne. Said. So. but having said that now the tank watchers will find some critical bit relocated to the next zip code… -
totm nov 2023 SpaceX Discussion Thread
CatastrophicFailure replied to Skylon's topic in Science & Spaceflight
Could be worse. I dreamt I was being chased through an apocalyptic wasteland by a giant banana reminding me I was late to work. -
totm nov 2023 SpaceX Discussion Thread
CatastrophicFailure replied to Skylon's topic in Science & Spaceflight
‘Tis official. Also also: -
totm nov 2023 SpaceX Discussion Thread
CatastrophicFailure replied to Skylon's topic in Science & Spaceflight
Good write up of Ms. Shotwell’s comments from the thing today: https://spacenews.com/shotwell-says-spacex-ready-for-starship-static-fire-test/ Also, confirmation of what needs no confirming, Gwynne is, in fact, the Queen. -
totm nov 2023 SpaceX Discussion Thread
CatastrophicFailure replied to Skylon's topic in Science & Spaceflight
ItsHappening.gif -
RP-1 Realistic Progression One for KSP 1.12.3
CatastrophicFailure replied to pap1723's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
Hey can anyone recommend a RP-1-compatible mod pack for nuclear reactors? I like the Near Future ones but it seems Dynamic Battery, a dependency, conflicts with the install. -
totm nov 2023 SpaceX Discussion Thread
CatastrophicFailure replied to Skylon's topic in Science & Spaceflight
Really a non-issue. One 11-min stop charge. Plug in, go take a leak, unplug & go. -
totm nov 2023 SpaceX Discussion Thread
CatastrophicFailure replied to Skylon's topic in Science & Spaceflight
That could put a nuclear reactor on Pluto. just sayin… -
totm nov 2023 SpaceX Discussion Thread
CatastrophicFailure replied to Skylon's topic in Science & Spaceflight
Prolly old news but… -
totm nov 2023 SpaceX Discussion Thread
CatastrophicFailure replied to Skylon's topic in Science & Spaceflight
Its Texas, tho. Even the humidity is bigger. -
totm nov 2023 SpaceX Discussion Thread
CatastrophicFailure replied to Skylon's topic in Science & Spaceflight
That’s what they did with N-1, and we all know how that went… -
totm nov 2023 SpaceX Discussion Thread
CatastrophicFailure replied to Skylon's topic in Science & Spaceflight
Perhaps more accurately called “acceleration” here (even though it’s decelerating), as the engine is firing and the force is quite a bit more than 1 G. -
totm nov 2023 SpaceX Discussion Thread
CatastrophicFailure replied to Skylon's topic in Science & Spaceflight
Dangit, those are the pages I was actually looking for! -
totm nov 2023 SpaceX Discussion Thread
CatastrophicFailure replied to Skylon's topic in Science & Spaceflight
It is extraordinary indeed. 2021 set a record for most rocket launches in a year, beating out previous records from decades ago, and I’m sure 2022 has already beaten that. Infographic below, there was a real dearth of launches around the turn of the century, picking up greatly once SpaceX came on the scene (not saying it was entirely their doing). Things have greatly picked up in the last 5 years or so, and streaming makes it much more accessible. Other than the odd Shuttle launch, live rocket launches were rare during that dark age, at most there might be a quick blurb on the evening news. as the saying goes, what a time to be alive. [SOURCE] -
totm nov 2023 SpaceX Discussion Thread
CatastrophicFailure replied to Skylon's topic in Science & Spaceflight
I wouldn’t say Musk is distracted, if anything, the usual media sources are. The guy is the king of time management and delegation. He draws some extremely talented people to his circle, turns them loose… then lights a fire under their butts. He also basically never sleeps, not like us normies: During this whole Twitter kerfuffle, both SpaceX and Tesla have managed to deliver some pretty impressive accomplishments, not the kind of thing possible with a “distracted” leader… unless the leader really knows exactly where his time resources are needed. The best part is no part, right? If you’re not adding things back in you’re not deleting enough The Starship project has switched to be a bit more risk-averse the last few months, and that’s very understandable and prudent. Whatever else happens with the first orbital attempt, it’s got to get clear of the pad. If it takes that out the whole project is set back months or years. Another booster is easy, another OLM is not, so they’re taking their time to make sure it gets that far the first time. Also: ArmageddonShuttleLaunch.gif AlsoAlso: -
totm dec 2019 Russian Launch and Mission Thread
CatastrophicFailure replied to tater's topic in Science & Spaceflight
Eek. -
totm nov 2023 SpaceX Discussion Thread
CatastrophicFailure replied to Skylon's topic in Science & Spaceflight
Tim Dodd mentioned in his latest video that there were a number of interviews as the process went on, so certainly some mental screening in there, as well as a medical evaluation. and now DearMoon’s Twitter account has been suspended… -
Wait, is it going to the asteroid belt or Kuiper Belt?
- 139 replies
-
- 1
-
- alternate history
- spaceshuttle
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Doesn’t have to be perfect to be a success, it just has to be good, and if they’re already hitting 500 miles at full weight, I’d call that pretty good. For a single driver, driving 350 miles (8 hours), charging/resting for 30 minutes, then putting another few hundred on will pretty much fill out their mandated workday. Even with a team, they can cover a lot of miles just making shorter, more frequent charging stops. That charging network has a long way to come yet, but the operational savings are gonna blow minds, and be worth a little more time for most cases.