Jump to content

gooddog15

Members
  • Posts

    362
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by gooddog15

  1. it depends, what flavor is it. what happens when I have jeb perform maintanence on a nuclear bomb?
  2. is this what you call bad camouflage? https://i.chzbgr.com/maxW500/7538148352/hCDE19CC4/ but in all seriousness, I would love to see a small transtage like the centaur or Inertial Upper Stage for the KSO in far out future.
  3. Have you ever thought of doing military missions, such as putting up more reconnaissance satellites ( like in STS 102), and sabotaging enemy satellites? (and maybe put tenacious back into temporary service with the kerbal states air force) Theres so much possibilities
  4. posted this post, realized it was stupid. so I changed it
  5. you don't simply click the "do experiment" button a few times to get a random science report, you have to wait awhile (say a few days to a few months). also, my example is just an example you got it! although, I didn't put in the decrease of science over time, which is very a good idea
  6. science parts currently display only 1 science report for a specific region of space or a celestrial body, which is boring. my idea is that science reports every so often change. for example: I have a probe in orbit around kerbin, armed with a thermometer. at first, it would show one unique science report, and clicking on it will yield similar results. after awhile, clicking on the instrument and getting a new science report that would say: "space is getting hotter for some reason". this new report would yield far more science than the others. this would rinse & repeat for a randomized amount of time. (ex: a new one would come in the next kerbal day, and another new one would come a kerbal week later) This would mean that spacecraft that you spent hours on wouldn't become obsolete after the main amount science is done, saving them from the dreaded terminate flight button . it also would mean that stations & bases will have more of a purpose. In other worlds, it would be like getting the same gumball from the candy machine, until one day, you would get a tasty brand new one!
  7. *darth kerbal* I find your lack of faith in the EWBCL disturbing
  8. I have a suggestion for a new part, a laser communication antenna! its awesome because its a laser, as all lasers are awesome! (it was also tested by the LADEE and galileo spacecraft) so, could you consider making something like this? or am I asking for too much?
  9. SPLASHDOWN BALLOONS????????????????!!!!!!!!!!!! finally, actual cushons for landing!
  10. you grow potatoes in space for some reason.. how do I grab a asteroid with my bare hands?
  11. I didn't say it wasn't ever going to be fired, it was intended to be flown upside down with a heatshield sandwiched between it and a fuel tank (kind of like the cancelled Copernicus ship for project constellation ) with a umbilical running fuel from the fuel tank to the NTRI was thinking of something like this: 5. ........____ ____ [>[] [) [____] [___]<] 1.__2.___3.___ 4. 1. NTR 2. heatshield 3. fueltank 4. upperstage from launch vehicle 5. fuel umbilical (periods)
  12. Ummm.......... SPAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACCCCCCCCCCCCCEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! why cant gilly be more silly?
  13. your face from a alternate dimension what is the shortest horrer story in history? (hint: it starts with a M and ends with a Y and sounds like sunday)
  14. It would be used in the case the NTR powered upper stage couldn't be fired to get itself into orbit (think of the public outrage over firing a nuclear powered rocket engine in the atmosphere. It would problably crush any space agency to its breaking point). also I think the Russians can care less about the failure of their Briz-M upperstage, as they already have a lake were by just standing around it you instantly get cancer.
  15. the heatshield, thrusters, and parachutes were for a launch failure in the upper atmosphere, in which the NTR and the rocket were on a ballistic trajectory. also I found a way for the plumbing part to work, using a umbilical on the side to connect the fuel lines to the NTR. It would act just like the Apollo CSMs umbilical between the service and command modules, detaching after a abort.
  16. nope, just orange juice should you use a razor in a earthquake?
  17. You're sued by warner brothers for copyright infringement How can i float in the sky?
  18. Its simple: just have a magical bunny turn matter into antimatter How do i eat antimatter
  19. *a few people in the room turn around and look at you, either happy or confused* Do you like seananners?
  20. RORSATs reactor ejection mechanism doesn't really fix the problem for proper disposal of the reactor though, as all it does is delay the reactors eventual reentry. Actually, it doesn't make sense to have a RTG on a spacecraft in low earth orbit if solar panels can do the same job while being cheaper.
  21. the question is, we know where the stuff is?
  22. its on fire after it was ignited by a dragon what happens when someone divides 0 to the power of infinity divide by 0?
  23. well there is one..... how to google something (it gets even more stupid if you google it)
×
×
  • Create New...