Jump to content

acealeam

Members
  • Posts

    165
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by acealeam

  1. Why do people care if they implement it? If you don't like it, don't use it. Personally, I like keyboard and mouse, but prefer a controller for things like driving. If you don't that's fine, and if you do, that's fine to. It's really just preference.
  2. I'd quit. But in all honesty, I can't see many people playing it. KSP has a bit of a learning curve, and if I may be so mean, I find the majority of pewdiepie viewers immature. Although, if they stick through the learning curve, I feel they should be welcomed as everyone else. As long as they seem to be decent people.
  3. With steam you get trading cards from the game. Now that may not seem important at all, but you can sell them for ~20 cents a piece. And you can turn off autoupdates and stuff, but you'll be told you have an update the second you log on. So really, there's no reason not get a steam copy.
  4. You seem to really hate the idea of playing casually.
  5. REP, REP, REP. This is one of the coolest things I've seen yet!
  6. It's kind of an on, off game. Right now, it's off for me. No doubt tomorrow or whenever the update comes will be on, or sooner. You always find something to do after awhile. And with consistent updates, you'll atleast be playing every once in awhile until it's done.
  7. Oh my god, thanks! But can you toggle engines on and off in the display? Or will I just have to add counter weights for where my other engines should be?
  8. It should be able to do it, the only problem is that there's no rcs for docking.
  9. Do you think you could create a version that deals with thrust? It would be very helpful for vtols. I know you can line up the CoT with the CoM, but I'd like to see rotation, too.
  10. We need more of these types of mods. Fill in all the niches before you start making 5m parts Great job, downloading.
  11. Anyways. I just read the OP, and created a nearly identical plane to the bumblebee. Only difference is, I use two orange ladders instead of the gray one. I put my fuel tank infront of the Nacelle's (further col from the com.), I used a v-tail style rudder and my parachutes are a bit more off balance then yours. That's it, other than that, completely identical. So, thanks for that.
  12. This is why I love you guys. I wish other devs communicated like this.
  13. Am I the only one who loves school?
  14. It's a commonly known bug. I thought they had fixed it, but I guess not. Sorry to hear that though. Do you have any quicksaves?
  15. You're probably one of the best Kerbal-ers? ever. Your designs are gorgeous and efficient, and your challenges are great fun.

  16. I vote searlefm. Simplistic lander, yet gorgeous at the same time.
  17. Just for clarification, when did the expansions thing end? I got in at 0.19, don't remember the date though. Am I eligible?
  18. "Ship Type: - Space Station (Crew Capacity: 14) Mission Destination: - Eeloo Objective: - Polar Orbit Condition 1: - Time Limit of 513 Days Condition 2: - No Nuclear Engines" I shall try my hardest! Seriously, nice work.
  19. This. How can it have a twr if there's no engines?
  20. I get everything but the TWR part. It shouldn't have a twr because I didn't put engines on, right? Nevertheless, this is amazing without the boosters!
  21. How do I know how much fuel to put in the boosters?
  22. That happened to me too. For some reason, unplugging it isn't enough though. I have to remove it from the controls.
  23. My first mun landing. It was actually in the demo. I just went straight up and there it was. I didn't even know map view existed!
  24. Even when this game gets old, it's still young. You'll come back within a week, and at the very very most, a month. Thanks for the updates, SQUAD!
×
×
  • Create New...