Jump to content
Forum will be temporarily offline today from 5 pm PST (midnight UTC) ×

Bigcheecho

Members
  • Posts

    82
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Bigcheecho

  1. I build a hill next to the poisonous hill and claim it for Denmark. Danish hill.
  2. 664: Add congress to reduce your budget to the point that you can barely afford to send anything to LKO.
  3. Grand tour. (Land on every celestial body in KSP and return.)
  4. The world forgot about Sealand, so they develop a military and conquer the hill. Sealand's hill and first land claim.
  5. I call in the Danish Air Force to take over the hill. Denmark's hill.
  6. Good, good. Dustrop is doing pretty well here, and I started increasing oil production. However, Tekistan managed to stop the rebels, so we will have to give weapons to them.
  7. I've used the shard money to improve my troop's training, increase quality of life, and hire a secret agent, which I used to provide weapons to the rebels. I think we should declare war before he defeats the rebels.
  8. I've actually been trying to declare war on Tekitstan, but my army is too weak. Anyways, I brought my army up to 25K, and hope to train them when I receive more moni.
  9. I'd like to join the Kerbal alliance. Nation: Dustrop
  10. No: 44=(4/4+4!)*4 44=(1+24)*4 44=(25)*4 44=100
  11. If you think that's Kerbal, just wait until you see the Orion engine...
  12. IMAGE HERE Coincidence? I think not.
  13. It is not required for players participate, it is not required for SQUAD to actually follow the feedback, nor is it presented as finished. It is simply a method for the community to improve the feedback they can give by being able to experience the feature first-hand, so that SQUAD has a better idea of how to improve the player's final experience. I can understand how you misinterpreted it, though, but I'm just insisting that SQUAD uses the "snapshots" system to give players an improved idea of any particular feature, allowing for an experience-based opinion instead of a prediction-based opinion.
  14. Because we are trying to imagine what KSP would be like if SQUAD's initial resources system were added to KSP.
  15. I honestly have to wonder why SQUAD would assume that feature x isn't fun without asking the people that play the game. As far as I know, the closest thing we have to the "complicated" resource system SQUAD initially proposed is the Kethane mod, which is relatively less complex, and is one of the most popular mods in existence. My suggestion would be to do relatively the same thing the Minecraft devs do: provide "snapshots" of future plans for other updates to improve the feedback gained by the community. It'll be a win-win scenario: The community can provide first-hand feedback to the developers, in which the developers develop based of both their plans and what the community wants, thus making the game better, causing KSP's fanbase tell others about the game, producing more money for SQUAD. However, unlike Minecraft, I don't mind if the snapshots are provided irregularly, just give us something more to base our opinion on to provide feedback right from the source instead of having to rely on mods and developer-released images. Finally, as a note to those who bring up the things we legally agreed to: Sure, SQUAD is not obliged to add feature x to the game, but that does not mean we can't ENCOURAGE them to add said feature to the game.
  16. Don't be too risky. I'll bet you could count those people without taking someone else's shoes off, as it is a less risky move.
  17. My two cents on this is that multiplayer should be added to KSP, but it is not a priority, unlike resources. The problem with me not taking a more specific stance is the apparent lack of information we currently have. (I haven't seen the video yet, as I am using an iPhone). We need to hear more from Squad.
  18. Oh boy, oh boy! Believe me, I don't want may ship attacked by SRBs, either. The solution, though, is simple: Allow users to have a list of people that can touch their ship. That way, massive ships can be built without fear of griefing, and people can still SRB joust if they want to.
  19. Mine: http://www.nationstates.net/the_union_of_sjaelland_and_fyn
  20. But... no spacecraft engineers at all? WHY WOULD YOU DO THIS TO ME?! WHY?!
  21. THE URFS IS IN TEH CENTA OF TEH GALAXY!!!!!! TEH BEBLES SEZ SO! In all seriousness, though, I'll probably jump in the "Black Hole" bandwagon, as it's the only feasible thing capable of having stars orbit it. Of course, I would allow people to believe it's the Earth that's in the center of the universe, but yet try to prove them wrong.
×
×
  • Create New...