Jump to content

KNSA Scientist

Members
  • Posts

    35
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

6 Neutral

Profile Information

  • About me
    Rocketeer
  1. Awesome! I haven't tried this yet, but it sounds amazing!
  2. That's adorable. I wish I could just cuddle up with it and... Cool. If you aren't afraid to part clip, you could fit a science junior and mystery goo inside of the capsule (sneaky, right?) I'll have to try it out.
  3. I think that the more scientific guys will reap in the science, but the brave daring stereotypical astronauts would give more reputation. It's just like how they picked the Mercury 7 astronauts
  4. If you are using more than 65 struts to get to the LKO/Mun, then you need to design your rocket better. Struts should be expensive, so that people build more sensible rockets. And I don't mean sensible as in real life rockets, I mean instead of making a pancake rocket with much more fuel than is needed you make a smaller rocket with less boosters . But that is just my opinion, so you are free to disagree.
  5. This is amazing and I want it right now, but I understand that there are bugs. You get rep though
  6. Somebody should put this on a robot and make world domination a thing at the KSC
  7. If you had a lander that had 4 engines on the side, those engines would fire with your algorithm because they have nothing connected at the bottom. You may need to change it, but I have zero knowlege of coding.
  8. Have you guys ever thought of removing the monopropellant from the crew capsule? It would reduce the weight by a little I imagine...
  9. I would love to join the Blue Team if that is alright.
  10. I think that would be nice, and that it could only refresh experiments once as a consequence for being smaller.
  11. This would be a cool feature, but you should be able to turn it off.
  12. Yeah, I do agree with you about the large b9 wings, they are a whole lot more stable. But the issue with large wings is that in FAR you get aerodynamic failures, so I had to think smaller. Which is also why I had the engines on the back, because the lifting body can keep it flying for as long as the fuel can take you. But thanks for the suggestions, I will keep them in mind.
  13. Uh, I will be posting my design soon. I just need to, you know, make it stop falling apart. But other then that, I will be editing this post to show what I have later. Edit: Here it is! This is the heavy bomber which is called the Daisy, she's a good one. Not the best handling, but she can roll well. Armed with anti-air guns on top, this thing won't die without a fight. She can hold 3 tall boy bombs, and 2 air burst bombs with a 2000lb bomb. Pretty picture heavy, so yeah. Oh and it works best at high altitudes.
  14. I think we will have magical pony rhinos flapping in the wind! OT: We should at least have 64 bit.
×
×
  • Create New...