Jump to content

HafCoJoe

Members
  • Posts

    4,931
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by HafCoJoe

  1. That's what I mean lol. I phrased it badly I think
  2. *I've seen posts disagreeing with science as well but I haven't seen a pole. I strongly agree with everyone who says KSP career is the worst of grinding and would like to see development in branches relevant to what types of flight you are doing. If I fly a plane 10 kilometers across the ocean, I would like to get more advanced lift or control. If I fly in high atmosphere, I want better efficiency. more times you get in orbit, the more probe pieces unlocked. If I travel to another planet, I'd like better survivability and likewise... NOT GETTING JETS FOR GOING TO AN ATMOSPHERE-LESS MOON! I think many of you agree with me and possibly there should be 2 options for career tree planning - one with generic science and one with relevance to flights?
  3. Yeah your right. I think that there should be a total budget limit, but also allow people to rack up in specific areas rather than generic points for everything. make it so people can unlock things they want by doing what they want. Don't force people to work in a cubical so they can get something better, let them choose what job they want first.
  4. If you fly a plane for 10 kilometers over the ocean you should get better wings and engines. same as flying high to get ram intakes and similar parts related to efficiency. If you travel to other planets, more efficient engines should come easier. If you land on other bodies, better landing gear and chutes! The science should be specific to what you DO! YOU should choose whether to do specific missions, rather than try to rack up the most "science" in going to atmosphereless planets to get jet engines.
  5. You don't need to move any of the parts to the parts folders? or anything else for that matter? - there's no specific label for which folder the parts go
  6. can I have clearer installation instructions? "extract the contents of the folder into you KSP archive and merge where it tells you too" VERY SPECIFIC! where to I even put the parts? I dragged all of them into the structural folder because the folders don't specify the types of parts. what do I do with the pictures and tutorials?!? what even do. - coming from an experienced mod installer.
  7. where is the old v0.21 download? I'm going to try out Kethane! but in my old save
  8. Just 2 interesting Ideas: I noticed in the builder and in the piece files that you can create intakes that store oxygen? It would be cool if I could build a space plane that sorta works in space. (this idea is kinda silly but it'd be pretty cool ) ALSO it would be cool to make eve's oceans made of some form of rocket fuel so you can fill up your engines again with a piece. (I heard a joke that eve's oceans where made of rocket fuel but they should actually be!) - Avera9eJoe
  9. D: ok thats what I thought... I was just hoping I could add some home-made marimba and piano tracks or something... Do you know of any mods that have custom sounds?
  10. I know there are listed sounds for nature, and the effects of clicking and editing in the VAB and SPH, but I cannot locate the background music. I also cannot find the space ambience tunes ore the intro theme. anyone know how I could possibly edit these or add in my own?
  11. I would almost suggest not even trying to launch first flight. Just put a command pod on the launch pad, hop out, and collect an EVA report and a ground sample of the launchpad (right click on the Kerbin). after that hop back into the pod and recover the vessel by scrolling above the altitude measurement. those 2 tests should give you enough science to research the first node. with that you can probably figure out the rest. Best of luck my fellow rocketeer! ps: I was like you when I first started demo KSP 2 years ago
  12. This will be a challenge for you guys! ***Easy: Don't return ***Normal: Get to duna, land, and return without the use of any decouplers. THIS DOESN'T MEAN YOU CANNOT HAVE EXPLOSIONS! ***Hard: land on Ike and bring back a surface sample. - (meaning bring a Kerman) good luck
  13. DUDE YOU ARE S RIGHT! I greatly enjoy problem solving games but even more so building games. Also Apollo 13 is a great movie what KSP needs now in my eyes is an easy multiplayer. Or a "race to the mun" game or something like that...
  14. "Hadbin Kerman" also billy-bobry and munfield Enory Kerman was my favorite because he was like Jeb. Always smiling he doesn't have a fun name though...
  15. Sweet thanks. so you add them as a pic? in your signature?
  16. I'm guessing the badges bellow peoples signatures show what it is that people have done in KSP but I have no clue how to get them... anyone know how?
  17. I can't seem to build any rockets. How do you get money?
  18. Inside the new R&D facility there's a bridge about 40 meters across and 10-15 meters above the ground. everyone wants to fly a plane under it hahaha
  19. First I'll fly under the new bridge, then probably attempt a Mun landing with all the new science parts. How about you?
×
×
  • Create New...