Jump to content

So.. re-entry heating - hard mode?


DJK

Recommended Posts

ok, just tested the

heatConductivity = 0.06 // half default
and it does indeed work.

Same for:

thermalMassModifier = 2.0

Probably gonna mess around with the values and see if i can come up with a "fix".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FlowerChild et al, there's an interesting setting in ModuleAblator, reentryConductivity. I'm guessing the heat shield can determine when it's in use and switch its conductivity to that instead of the original conductivity. Might want to poke around and see when that comes into play, say making a module that on right-click displays the part's heatConductivity and see when it changes?

Also, in Physics.cfg, it looks like the convection exponent is exposed for the "mach heating"--you might try a higher exponent than 3 (and a lower convectionFactor) if you want to try to tune up reentry heat. Thing is, though, recall that (a) spaceplanes are only 500m/s lower than reentry on ascent, and ascent takes way longer, and (B) interplanetary trajectories can be in excess of 5km/sec, so if you make Kerbin dangerous via that exponent, better test 2.5x the reentry velocity too. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FlowerChild et al, there's an interesting setting in ModuleAblator, reentryConductivity. I'm guessing the heat shield can determine when it's in use and switch its conductivity to that instead of the original conductivity. Might want to poke around and see when that comes into play, say making a module that on right-click displays the part's heatConductivity and see when it changes?

Also, in Physics.cfg, it looks like the convection exponent is exposed for the "mach heating"--you might try a higher exponent than 3 (and a lower convectionFactor) if you want to try to tune up reentry heat. Thing is, though, recall that (a) spaceplanes are only 500m/s lower than reentry on ascent, and ascent takes way longer, and (B) interplanetary trajectories can be in excess of 5km/sec, so if you make Kerbin dangerous via that exponent, better test 2.5x the reentry velocity too. ;)

Thanks a million for that Nathan. I'm going to bookmark your post there for when I get to tweaking reentry, as your info on such matters has always been invaluable :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...