leptoon Posted July 17, 2015 Share Posted July 17, 2015 (edited) What would you say is the best place near Kerbin or on/near one of its moons to launch interplanetary spacecraft from? I've already begun a base on Minmus but gravity is so low combined with an icy surface, I have to weigh the modules down at least 25 tons just to keep them from sliding around. Edited July 17, 2015 by leptoon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evanitis Posted July 17, 2015 Share Posted July 17, 2015 In my opinion, Minmus surface is the most convenient for fueling while LKO is the most convenient for launching. I used a station on Minmus orbit for a while, but I found it too tedious to shoot for ideal ideal transfer angles from that inclination. These days I refine on LKO. Getting the ore there might be a hassle, but I don't have to do that too often and it's easy compared to an interplanetary mission. It would be the same if I kept the ISRU on Minmus and I only transfered the fuel. I believe that's the most cost-effective way, as the ships I launch only have to carry enough fuel to reach Kerbin orbit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leptoon Posted July 17, 2015 Author Share Posted July 17, 2015 (edited) I see... Thanks for the input. Edited July 17, 2015 by leptoon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wemb Posted July 17, 2015 Share Posted July 17, 2015 Yup, I'd say minmus too - easy to get to, low dV to move fuel up from the surface - big flat open areas for landing on, low dV to get out of it's orbit, and when you're there, you're already most of the way out of Kerbin's system too. Low gravity can be a problem with things moving about - but the good news is that reaction wheels can generally be enough to correct anything that's beginning to topple over when you land - and, if battery and solar power allows, can be enough to keep a vessel perched in some every funny angles even when landed on a slope.You do have to be careful eva-ing - I've pushed rockets over by accident myself..Wemb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nich Posted July 17, 2015 Share Posted July 17, 2015 What is the most cost effective way to leave Miniums? Burn down to Kirbin for oberith effect or just leave directly from Minimus? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wemb Posted July 17, 2015 Share Posted July 17, 2015 (edited) What is the most cost effective way to leave Miniums? Burn down to Kirbin for oberith effect or just leave directly from Minimus?To get a slingshot. But getting the timing and trajectory right to do without having to do more expensive corrections afterwards? Might be more difficult than it's worth.Sorry - edit - not a slingshot - forgot that they're not the same thing. But still - getting the end tradjectory right might be too difficult to make it worth much.Wemb Edited July 17, 2015 by Wemb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Iron Crown Posted July 17, 2015 Share Posted July 17, 2015 To get a slingshot more Oberth Effect. But getting the timing and trajectory right to do without having to do more expensive corrections afterwards? Might be more difficult than it's worth.Fixed for you. Might seem pedantic but slingshots and the Oberth Effect are really confusing at first, conflating the terms only makes things worse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jouni Posted July 17, 2015 Share Posted July 17, 2015 My standard orbits for interplanetary departures are (just above) 120 km, 160 km, 240 km, and 600 km. Higher orbits are more expensive to reach, but low-TWR transfer burns are more accurate from them. Transfer burns require essentially the same delta-v from all of these orbits.Higher orbits are also useful, because they allow higher time warp multipliers (at 120 km, 240 km, 480 km, and 600 km), and rendezvousing with ships at them requires less waiting. The 160 km orbit also reduces lag, because the games starts using a less detailed model of Kerbin beyond it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yasmy Posted July 17, 2015 Share Posted July 17, 2015 (edited) Here's the rough delta-v cost for going interplanetary either via dipping down to the parent for a powered slingshot, directly from a moon, or from low orbit around the parent. These calculations assume no inclination changes and zero eccentricity orbits, so it can be significantly off. I post it more as a general guideline.I'm going to agree with others that departing from LKO is easiest. Bringing fuel from Minmus to an LKO depot is a lot more wasteful, but so much easier. Fuel tugs, being almost all tankage, tend to be much easier to fly and dock than interplanetary vessels, and can have fabulous total delta-v. Timing is also trivial from LKO. That said, if your interplanetary vessel is low on total delta-v, topping off at Minmus could enable you to complete a mission which you couldn't if you departed directly from LKO.Transfer burn delta-v [m/s]. Does not include capture at the target. Moon -> Target: Moon->Parent->Target Moon->Target Parent->Target Gilly -> Moho: 776 1367 1643 Gilly -> Kerbin: 507 497 1373 Gilly -> Duna: 775 1364 1642 Gilly -> Dres: 1308 2476 2176 Gilly -> Jool: 1648 3048 2517 Gilly -> Eeloo: 1786 3264 2655 Mun -> Moho: 1135 1509 1699 Mun -> Eve: 462 348 1024 Mun -> Duna: 498 414 1060 Mun -> Dres: 987 1279 1550 Mun -> Jool: 1361 1840 1924 Mun -> Eeloo: 1520 2065 2084Minmus -> Moho: 943 1958 1699Minmus -> Eve: 270 440 1024Minmus -> Duna: 306 567 1060Minmus -> Dres: 795 1700 1550Minmus -> Jool: 1168 2319 1924Minmus -> Eeloo: 1328 2559 2084 Ike -> Moho: 1970 2159 2118 Ike -> Eve: 908 975 1055 Ike -> Kerbin: 464 421 611 Ike -> Dres: 658 671 806 Ike -> Jool: 1158 1266 1306 Ike -> Eeloo: 1382 1518 1529Laythe -> Moho: 2228 1273 3135Laythe -> Eve: 2109 1131 3015Laythe -> Kerbin: 2049 1063 2955Laythe -> Duna: 1979 986 2886Laythe -> Dres: 1906 909 2812Laythe -> Eeloo: 1893 896 2799 Vall -> Moho: 1835 1334 3135 Vall -> Eve: 1715 1099 3015 Vall -> Kerbin: 1655 980 2955 Vall -> Duna: 1586 844 2886 Vall -> Dres: 1512 702 2812 Vall -> Eeloo: 1499 678 2799 Tylo -> Moho: 1807 1298 3135 Tylo -> Eve: 1688 1141 3015 Tylo -> Kerbin: 1627 1067 2955 Tylo -> Duna: 1558 988 2886 Tylo -> Dres: 1484 913 2812 Tylo -> Eeloo: 1472 901 2799 Bop -> Moho: 1452 1652 3135 Bop -> Eve: 1332 1275 3015 Bop -> Kerbin: 1272 1068 2955 Bop -> Duna: 1203 811 2886 Bop -> Dres: 1129 510 2812 Bop -> Eeloo: 1116 455 2799 Pol -> Moho: 1335 1739 3135 Pol -> Eve: 1216 1332 3015 Pol -> Kerbin: 1156 1104 2955 Pol -> Duna: 1086 815 2886 Pol -> Dres: 1013 462 2812 Pol -> Eeloo: 1000 394 2799 Edited July 17, 2015 by Yasmy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharpy Posted July 17, 2015 Share Posted July 17, 2015 (edited) Departure from Minmus kills the benefits of Oberth effect. Transfer from LKO to Duna can be only 80m/s more than from LKO just outside the Kerbin SOI. And transfer to Duna from outside Kerbin SOI is more than transfer from LKO - even counting the dV needed for escape of Kerbin SOI.Probably the best transfer would be dropping from Minmus into LKO (after refuelleing) without circularizing, just depart on the right trajectory with a small burn at the periapsis. Although timing that right may be more than tricky... Edited July 17, 2015 by Sharpy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yasmy Posted July 17, 2015 Share Posted July 17, 2015 Higher orbits are also useful, because they allow higher time warp multipliers (at 120 km, 240 km, 480 km, and 600 km), and rendezvousing with ships at them requires less waiting. The 160 km orbit also reduces lag, because the games starts using a less detailed model of Kerbin beyond it.I do this around other bodies as well. I place my station or return vessel just high enough to get the minimum warp I need to maintain sanity. I hate having to switch vessels to warp fast enough to do something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xtoro Posted July 17, 2015 Share Posted July 17, 2015 If your plan is to refuel before leaving Kerbin's SOI, Minmus is best. Yes you need to correct inclination on the way, sometimes, but if you compare having a mining facility on the Mun to Minmus, you'll spend more dv launching from the Mun than from Minmus+inclination change. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yasmy Posted July 17, 2015 Share Posted July 17, 2015 (edited) - even counting the dV needed for escape of Kerbin SOI.Everything else you said was correct, but this isn't. Duna doesn't cost too much to get to from interplanetary space near Kerbin. Same goes for Eve. Occasionally going from a moon directly interplanetary is cheaper than going from LKO, and sometimes it is even cheaper than dipping down to LKO to perform the burn. For instance, going directly to Duna or Eve from the Mun is cheaper than dipping down to Kerbin. Edited July 17, 2015 by Yasmy spelling Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajburges Posted July 17, 2015 Share Posted July 17, 2015 LKO+ Optimal Oberth effect- logistics of refuelingMKO (250 km)+ Oberth effect+ higher timing tolerance+ higher acceleration tolerance+ lower resolution textures used for Kerbin at higher altitude. Less lag during assembly- fuel logistics- less Oberth effectLaunch from Minmus+ simple fuel logistics+ different/delayed launch windows- very little Oberth effect- orbital inclinationKerbin gravity assist from Minmus+ simple fuel logistics+ even more Oberth effect+ enroute inclination correction- very complex manuvers with tight timingPick the one whose advantages align to your needs. Due to part counts, you never want to assemble a multi module behemoth in LKO. Once you assemble in MKO just launch from there. OTOH a single launch mission from Duna is simplest to burn straight from LKO. If you don't want to maintain a fuel convoy to LKO to support refueling, you either need to burn funds on refuel missions from the surface or visit Minmus. (or capture a large asteroid) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Iron Crown Posted July 17, 2015 Share Posted July 17, 2015 You can't use Kerbin for a gravity assist when leaving from Minmus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xtoro Posted July 17, 2015 Share Posted July 17, 2015 You can't use Kerbin for a gravity assist when leaving from Minmus.Depends how he's using the term. Doing the action of a gravity assist is not possible, but using Kerbin's gravity to assist you in accomplishing the Oberth Effect is correct Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Iron Crown Posted July 17, 2015 Share Posted July 17, 2015 Dropping periapsis to get more Oberth effect is not a gravity assist. That was sort of my point, and as I said earlier in thread it may seem pedantic but gravity assists and the Oberth Effect are confusing concepts for many (they certainly were for me when i learned about them), conflating the terms only makes things worse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xtoro Posted July 17, 2015 Share Posted July 17, 2015 Oh I know, was just joking, I'm sure he didn't mean it that way. The easiest way to explain, I think, is that you can't leave a body's SOI and use its parent's body for a gravity assist. Same as you can't use the Sun (Kerbol) for a gravity assist unless you're outside that sun's SOI to begin with. Those cases would be considered the Oberth Effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jlcarneiro Posted July 17, 2015 Share Posted July 17, 2015 Great topic and better discussion, thanks!Do you know of some tutorial (or video) that explains the difference between Oberth Effect and gravity assist? And (better yet) a video that shows such maneuver (e.g. from Minmus to Duna through Kerbin periapsis)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AaronLS Posted July 17, 2015 Share Posted July 17, 2015 You can't use Kerbin for a gravity assist when leaving from Minmus.Being pendantic is fine if not discarding the essence of what was conveted. If you want to correct terminology then say "that is called X, Y is the wrong term for that". As is it sounds like you're challenging the essence of what others are proposing rather than clarifying terminology. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xtoro Posted July 17, 2015 Share Posted July 17, 2015 Being pendantic is fine if not discarding the essence of what was conveted. If you want to correct terminology then say "that is called X, Y is the wrong term for that". As is it sounds like you're challenging the essence of what others are proposing rather than clarifying terminology.Gravity assist is a tricky terminology and I wish it had its own name to make it clearer. But I do agree with Red that they are not the same thing...Great topic and better discussion, thanks!Do you know of some tutorial (or video) that explains the difference between Oberth Effect and gravity assist? And (better yet) a video that shows such maneuver (e.g. from Minmus to Duna through Kerbin periapsis)?I explained it in the post above yours (may have been ninja'd) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mhoram Posted July 17, 2015 Share Posted July 17, 2015 (edited) Do you know of some tutorial (or video) that explains the difference between Oberth Effect and gravity assist? And (better yet) a video that shows such maneuver (e.g. from Minmus to Duna through Kerbin periapsis)?Here are two posts that try to explain how both work:Oberth EffectGravity Assist Edited September 26, 2015 by mhoram typo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajburges Posted July 17, 2015 Share Posted July 17, 2015 You can't use Kerbin for a gravity assist when leaving from Minmus.But if you also use your Oberth burn trajectory to modify ejection angle, it's back to being a gravity assist. Given a month long orbital period, chances are you want to play with your ejection angle as well as realize greater Oberth gains.The two are not mutually exclusive manuvers (as if they weren't confusing enough in usage) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharpy Posted July 17, 2015 Share Posted July 17, 2015 The "dumbed down" explanation would be that Oberth maneuver is a powered Gravity Assist, and vice versa. A normal gravity assist requires entry and departure at specific angles relative to the assisting body's trajectory (in most intuitive way, if "front" is the direction towards which the body (a moon, a planet) is heading, passing "behind" speeds you up, passing "in front" slows you down).Oberth effect only requires you to move fast - the faster you move the more actual speed/trajectory change you can squeeze out of the same delta-V. Both speeding up and slowing down (but not so much sideways). That means you can tweak your entry and exit angles as much as you like, just do it near periapsis to get the most out of your fuel.Of course one doesn't exclude the other. You can get much more speed out of combining Oberth maneuver and a gravity assist than from either of them. It's also pretty hard to perform an Oberth maneuver without performing a gravity assist at the same time - after all you are flying by a body, and it will affect you *somehow* (possibly thwarting your Oberth maneuver benefits if you entered an assist that acts in the opposite direction than your burn...)Also, while gravity assists are always about "smaller scale" flyby affecting a "larger scale" speed - a moon flyby affects your orbit around a planet, a planet flyby affects your orbit around the sun - you can't perform a Kerbin gravity assist to change your Kerbin orbit - Oberth maneuver is independent of these. Say, you want to get a capture - enter orbit of Eve. If you only skirt its SOI, and start braking, you'll spend a lot of fuel to get the periapsis near the planet's atmosphere. But if you enter at such an angle that you're almost skirting its atmosphere, then burn retrograde at the periapsis, you'll get a capture (an orbit) in a fraction of the delta-V; as you approached it, its gravity was pulling you in and sped you up considerably, making your burn much more efficient - using Eve gravity for changing your velocity relative to Eve. (If you wanted to try capture using gravity assist, you'd have to use Gilly for braking. But Gilly being so small and light wouldn't be much of assistance - the heavier the body the stronger the effect, simply because you're "falling" faster.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharpy Posted July 17, 2015 Share Posted July 17, 2015 For instance, going directly to Duna or Eve from the Mun is cheaper than dipping down to Kerbin.Mun yes, Minmus no. Mun is close to Kerbin enough that you need quite a bit of delta-V to drop your periapsis to LKO. Note how the farther the orbit the slower the orbital speed and the less you need to brake to get the periapsis all the way down. So, getting from Minmus to LKO periapsis is very cheap. And again, orbital speed of Mun is high enough that Oberth effect for departure is not insignificant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now