The Number Game Continued

[Sirius628]

Nevermind, nulled.

On 5/5/2017 at 4:58 AM, Xorth Tanovar said:

1-

 

On 5/5/2017 at 5:02 AM, Brent Kerman said:

0-

 

On 5/5/2017 at 7:29 AM, Benjamin Kerman said:

1+

 

On 5/5/2017 at 7:43 AM, Brent Kerman said:

0-

 

On 5/5/2017 at 8:00 AM, DarkOwl57 said:

1+

 

On 5/5/2017 at 8:02 AM, Brent Kerman said:

0-

 

On 5/5/2017 at 8:27 AM, max_creative said:

1(+) 

 

On 5/5/2017 at 8:32 AM, Brent Kerman said:

0-

 

On 5/5/2017 at 0:08 PM, 53miner53 said:

1+

 

On 5/5/2017 at 0:12 PM, Brent Kerman said:

0-

We stayed between 1 and -1 for 10 posts. That is considered a win for team zero. Don't believe me? Just read the rules!

Spoiler

11. If we stay between 1 and -1 for ten or more posts, it is counted as a win for the zero team.

 

Edited May 6, 2017 by Sirius628

[53miner53]

Ok then. Starting another game.

1+

[DarkOwl57]

On 3/23/2017 at 4:07 PM, Sirius628 said:

Round 3 goes to the positives, but the win is not counted due to a medal of dishonour.

HEY! JUST BECAUSE THEY CAN'T KEEP UP DOESN'T MEAN IT'S A MEDAL OF DISHONOR!

[TheEpicSquared]

7 minutes ago, DarkOwl57 said:

HEY! JUST BECAUSE THEY CAN'T KEEP UP DOESN'T MEAN IT'S A MEDAL OF DISHONOR!

From the lower part of page 61:

To the beginning of page 64:

 

It's been only you and @munlander1 who have been posting.

 

Nothing personal, but I think you two should be awarded the medal of dishonor.  

 

Also, 2+

 

[Brent Kerman]

1-

[Sirius628]

5 hours ago, DarkOwl57 said:

HEY! JUST BECAUSE THEY CAN'T KEEP UP DOESN'T MEAN IT'S A MEDAL OF DISHONOR!

If two people on the same team keep posting in rapid alternation, it's a medal of dishonour, whether their team is in the lead or not.

Also, 0 (-)

On 5/3/2017 at 9:55 AM, DarkOwl57 said:

G TO THE G BOYS!!!! WOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!

@Sirius628? Might wanna take note of that victory

What does G to the G mean?

[DarkOwl57]

Good Game

And just because they weren't ready for an attack doesn't mean it's unfair! It just means that we had perfect planning!

1+

[Sirius628]

0-

Also, you betrayed us by joining the positives!

Edited May 6, 2017 by Sirius628

[DarkOwl57]

As @TheEpicSquared said, it got boring playing for the negatives in both the last thread and this thread

1+

[Sirius628]

0-

What do you mean it got boring?

Edited May 6, 2017 by Sirius628

[DarkOwl57]

same thing over and over and over again? Kinda tedious

1+

[Sirius628]

0 (-)

 

 

Edited May 6, 2017 by Sirius628

[DarkOwl57]

1+

[Sirius628]

2 (+)

I'm saying plus so team 0 doesn't win.

[53miner53]

3+

thanks

[Sirius628]

2 (-)

Haha!

[53miner53]

3+

[DarkOwl57]

4+

[Sirius628]

2 (-)

[DarkOwl57]

3+

Skirmish

[Sirius628]

2 (-)

 

Edited May 6, 2017 by Sirius628

[DarkOwl57]

On 3/23/2017 at 4:07 PM, Sirius628 said:

 

  Hide contents

2. You cannot perform any operation** again until another person has successfully* perform an operation to change the current number. (Technically you can just get 2 people on the same team spam posts real fast without breaking this rule. But that is exploiting the rule and being cheap. I will record your win snidely, and that pair will get a medal of dishonour.) 

(Edited for highlight)

 

Says nothing about not counting the win

3+

[Sirius628]

23 minutes ago, DarkOwl57 said:

Says nothing about not counting the win

I did record it, but I did not count it towards the overall score.

 

Edited May 6, 2017 by Sirius628

[Sirius628]

2 (-)

[53miner53]

3+