New Hubble Observations Boost Evidence For Elusive Exomoon

[MedwedianPresident]

According to this article, we are close to detecting an exomoon, e.g. a moon orbiting an exoplanet, for the first time in the history of astronomy.

https://gizmodo.com/new-hubble-observations-boost-evidence-for-elusive-exom-1829494435

Astronomers have confirmed thousands of exoplanets—worlds outside of our Solar System—but they haven’t nabbed a single exomoon. New research is bolstering the case for a suspected exomoon first detected last year, but scientists say the evidence is still not definitive.

To date, astronomers have confirmed the existence of 3,851 exoplanets—an impressive number given that the first exoplanet was discovered just 26 years ago. Yet during all this time, and after all those amazing planetary discoveries, astronomers haven’t been able to prove the existence of an exomoon, that is, a moon in orbit around a planet in another star system.

This is a surprising result, given that exomoons are surely ubiquitous across the cosmos. Take our own Solar System, for example. Our eight planets host 185 known natural satellites. Of these, 79 belong to Jupiter and 62 to Saturn—an embarrassment of riches that showcases the potential of gas giants to harbor large collections of natural satellites. What’s more, a hefty portion of exomoons are likely to be habitable, as argued in a research paper published earlier this year.

But we still haven’t found any of these moons.

Indeed, exomoons are proving to be frustratingly difficult to detect, and for obvious reasons. Unlike enormous gas giants and super-Earths, moons tend to be on the smallish side. Not only that, but they’re spinning around an object that’s also spinning around an object; after a few observations, astronomers can predict when an exoplanet will pass in front of its host star, but knowing when an exoplanet’s moon might make an appearance is a different challenge entirely. So it makes sense that astronomers are struggling to make a definitive detection.

As some of you may recall from last year, astronomers using the Kepler Space Telescope detected a faint dip in the brightness of a star called Kepler-1625, which was interpreted to be a potential sign of an exomoon.

The data wasn’t definitive, but the observation resulted in the astronomers getting 40 hours access to the Hubble Space Telescope. With Hubble, astronomers Alex Teachey and David Kipping from Columbia University were able to collect data that’s four times more precise than what Kepler was able to acquire. The results of this second survey, published today in Science Advances, further the case for the existence of this exomoon.

“Our initial report was based on Kepler-data alone, which we always felt was not sufficient to claim a discovery,” Teaching told Gizmodo.

There are basically two features of the new data that suggest the presence of a moon.

The first is an apparent dip in the brightness of the host star following the planet’s transit, which the astronomers attribute to the exomoon. The alleged exomoon is in orbit around a known exoplanet called Kepler-1625b, a large gas giant that’s several times bigger than Jupiter. From our perspective, it takes Kepler-1625b around 19 hours to travel across the face of its host star. Astronomers can’t actually see the planet, which is 8,000 light-years away, but they can detect a drop in the host star’s brightness when it passes in front; it’s this eclipsing effect, called a transit, that allows scientists to detect distant exoplanets.

Around 3.5 hours after Kepler-1625b performed its transit, Hubble detected a second, significantly smaller dimming of the star’s brightness. In a statement, Kipping said it was consistent with “a moon trailing the planet like a dog following its owner on a leash.” Unfortunately, however, the scheduled Hubble observations ended before the complete transit of the supposed exomoon could be measured.

The second key observation was the presence of transit timing effects, which indicate there is something in the system tugging on the planet gravitationally.

“Basically, when a planet has a moon, the planet is of course pulling on the moon gravitationally, but the moon is also pulling on the planet, and they’re both actually orbiting their common center of mass—a point in space along the line between the centers of the two objects,” explained Teaching. “So because the planet is orbiting this point—called the barycenter—it wobbles in its orbit around the star. What that does is, it affects the timings of the transits. Sometimes the planet transits a little earlier, sometimes a little later. Those are the transit timing variations, or TTVs.”

Teaching said the moon explanation is superior to other explanations, such as the gravitational influence of an undiscovered exoplanet in the Kepler-1625 system. The exomoon explanation also has the added benefit of being a single explanation for the two observed phenomena. But as Teaching and Kipping admit, the data is still incomplete, and something unknown may be influencing the observations.

“We would just stress that this remains an exomoon candidate,” Teaching told Gizmodo. “It’s a tantalizing result, certainly, but it really still needs to be confirmed by more observations and, hopefully, other teams replicating our results.”

Regardless, a picture of this exoplanet and moon is beginning to emerge. If this is an exomoon, it’s actually quite large—about the size of Neptune. By comparison, Jupiter’s Ganymede—the largest moon in our Solar System—is 3,270 miles (5,268 kilometers) in diameter, compared to Neptune and its 30,500-mile-wide (50,000 kilometers) diameter. This exomoon is about 1.5 percent the mass of its host planet, which, interestingly, is the same mass-ratio between Earth and our Moon, but on a far less grandiose scale. By the standards of our Solar System, this is a moon of gargantuan proportions—an attribute the researchers say is largely responsible for its discovery.

Natalie Hinkel, an astronomer at Arizona State University who wasn’t involved with the new study, was impressed by how the authors vetted their data and analyses.

“They considered a wide variety of angles, caveats, and avenues that could render their findings null and void—but all lead them back to the likely presence of an exomoon,” Hinkel told Gizmodo. “However, because there have been no observations of this kind, I agree with their assessment that it is the ‘unknown unknowns’ which may make or break this discovery.”

University of Southern Queensland astronomer Rob Wittenmyer said the paper was thorough and that the authors did not overstate their claim.

“The result is not surprising, as evidenced by the abundance of moons in our Solar System,” Wittenmyer told Gizmodo. “As moons go, this one is quite large, and hence detectable. I suspect that, like exoplanets and cockroaches, exomoons are everywhere—when you see one, there are many more you missed. As techniques are refined, we will surely find more exomoons in the coming decades.”

David Bennett, a scientist at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, agrees that additional observations will be required to brand this a definitive discovery of an exomoon.

“Also, the planet is 10 times more massive than Jupiter, and the predicted mass of the moon is close to that of Neptune. So, if we saw these objects in isolation, we would consider them both to be planets,” Bennett told Gizmodo. “If the observed companion to the planet is confirmed, there is a good chance that it would be considered to be a binary planet instead of a moon. It could be a Neptune-mass planet that was captured by a super-Jupiter planet during the formation of the planetary system.”

Which is a good point. How is it even possible that this particular planet-moon architecture even exists? If it’s confirmed that Kepler-1625b hosts such a large moon, astronomers will have the added challenge of figuring out how this particular star system took shape.

Another neat fact about Kepler-1625b is that its orbit resides within its host star’s habitable zone. Now, it’s very unlikely that this gas giant, and its equally gassy, Neptune-like exomoon, could harbor life. But what if this purported exomoon has its own moons, and those moons are of a terrestrial nature? Could life actually emerge on the moon of a moon?

“If there is truly an exomoon around Kepler-1625b, a whole new subfield could open up, one we scientists—as well as sci-fi writers—have only speculated about, regarding the discovery and possible habitability of exomoons,” said Hinkel. “Essentially, it could be like the TV show Fireflywhere people live on core worlds as well as the outlying moons.”

It’ll be awhile before we can solve these sorts of problems, but this latest observation means we can at least start to pose the questions.

[Science Advances]

[UmbralRaptor]

The paper is currently open access.

I'd recommend checking it out, since even if you can't follow all the fancy statistics there's interesting commentary. eg:

Quote

The blackbody equilibrium temperature of the planet and moon, assuming zero albedo, is ~350 K. Adopting a more realistic albedo can drop this down to ~300 K. Of course, as a likely gaseous pair of objects, there is not much prospect of habitability here, although it appears that the moon can indeed be in the temperature zone for optimistic definitions of the habitable zone.

Quote

The origins of such a system can only be speculated upon at this time. A mass ratio of 1.5% is certainly not unphysical from in situ formation using gas-starved disk models, but it does represent the very upper end of what numerical simulations form.

...

If confirmed, Kepler-1625b-i will certainly provide an interesting puzzle for theorists to solve.

 

[Scotius]

A Neptune - sized moon That could have its own moons. Some of which might be habitable. This system might have some truly spectacular sky views.

[ProtoJeb21]

5 hours ago, Scotius said:

A Neptune - sized moon That could have its own moons. Some of which might be habitable. This system might have some truly spectacular sky views.

I’m not too sure about that. Kepler-1625b-i is probably too close to its giant parent planet for any moons to exist in stable orbits around it. But it’s not out of the realm of possibility that other, much smaller moons orbit further out — maybe some captured asteroids or dwarf planets. 

[Scotius]

Are you sure about it? Neptune - sized planet moon with comparable mass would have pretty hefty gravity well on its own.

Huh. What do you know. Scott Manley already did a video about latest discoveries - including this exomoon.

In a nutshell: if it exists, it actually can have its own moons - despite super-Jupiter's closeness.

[Spaceception]

Cool worlds, a channel led by the people looking for this came out with a couple videos

 

 

 

[Scotius]

This discovery means that A: or instruments and observations methodology is finally reaching required levels of precision for detection of exomoons. Or at least biggest of them. B: now that we (almost) have direct confirmation of existence of one exomoon, we can really start looking for more. And we know what to look for.

[Spaceception]

10 minutes ago, Scotius said:

This discovery means that A: or instruments and observations methodology is finally reaching required levels of precision for detection of exomoons. Or at least biggest of them. B: now that we (almost) have direct confirmation of existence of one exomoon, we can really start looking for more. And we know what to look for.

We need moar telescopes.