A "KSP Loading..." Preview: The 48-7S “Spark” Liquid Fuel Engine revamp

[klgraham1013]

11 minutes ago, 5thHorseman said:

Well Squad didn't seem to think 1.0 was anything particularly special

To true.

1 hour ago, lajoswinkler said:

I don't really see any need for "KSP 2"

I'm sure the piles and piles of legacy code with slapped on features disagrees with you.

1 hour ago, lajoswinkler said:

I don't even consider what we have now a full game.

This we can agree on.  Though, it's a lot closer then what "1.0" was.  Really, though.  It's got the modes, independent of quality.  They could stop development now, and on the surface, it could be seen as a finished product.  So maybe I don't agree.  There's always grey areas in such conversations.

Edited December 4, 2018 by klgraham1013

[lajoswinkler]

2 hours ago, klgraham1013 said:

I'm sure the piles and piles of legacy code with slapped on features disagrees with you.

This we can agree on.  Though, it's a lot closer then what "1.0" was.  Really, though.  It's got the modes, independent of quality.  They could stop development now, and on the surface, it could be seen as a finished product.  So maybe I don't agree.  There's always grey areas in such conversations.

I agree it has patches and patches and it needs complete rework done, but the cost of it all... I doubt it happen any time soon. Maybe even never. Popularity of KSP is dwindling and I think the opportunity has been missed. I consider KSP to be a brown dwarf.

[lajoswinkler]

8 hours ago, 5thHorseman said:

Well Squad didn't seem to think 1.0 was anything particularly special (except to jump to it very quickly after 0.25) so sure, why not go right to 2.0 after 1.9.

It was a PR move many people didn't like, including myself.

[klesh]

Spark is one of my favorite and most-used engines. 

I really like all 3 variants of the redesign.  Looking forward to this one.  Well done!