Jump to content

Re: Wiki: keep things serperate or not?


Jestersage

Recommended Posts

I actually have an account on the KSP wiki, and I may start to work on it. Currently, I have a few questions:

1) In terms of parts, especially Stock and DLC, Should we go with the current scheme (absolute segregated), or employed the unified approach as typical in games with DLC (eg: https://battlefield.fandom.com/wiki/Template:Weapons/BF1)? [I personally prefer the latter approach]

2) Should we actually maintain a seperate section for "legacy parts": that is, parts that are depreciated and replaced with a completely different part name? Right now there are no consistency, with those in 1.4 being seperated, but those in 1.5/1.6 combined.

Edited by Jestersage
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...