Jump to content

What kind docking ports were on the MIR space station


Recommended Posts

@Bill Phil is mistaken.

Kristall had two APAS-89 docking ports, compatible with Buran, Soyuz-Spasatel (e.g. Soyuz TM-16), and a modified Shuttle. Buran and Shuttle dockings required the module to be undocked and redocked to the forward core module port. This was tolerable for the Buran test flight program, but the amount of internal communications passing through Mir's docking ports was snowballing and made module re-dockings a chore; while the standard location required partly stowing the solar arrays to make room for the spaceplane. So the Shuttle docking module was pretty much just an extension with some tucked-on situational utilities.

Everything else was old-school SSVP-G4000, some with reinforced, heavy-duty collars and locks... and it was rather complicated. Apparently the core module had only three cones for its six ports, and moving those would require an "internal EVA" inside the docking hub to move the cone from the inside of the opened hatch to the exterior of the next hatch to be used. All modules (except Kvant, obviously) would dock to the axial port first, and then use their Lyappa arm grapples to pivot to the final docking location.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4a/Mir_Docking_Cone_Placement_and_Module_Movements.pdf

 

Edited by DDE
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Bill Phil said:

Interesting.

I’ve read a lot about Soviet spaceflight so it’s weird that I’ve never heard of SSVP. 

Because we typically just call it "probe and drogue". Possibly due to how common it appear sticking out, from Soyuz to even Federation

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Bill Phil said:

Interesting.

I’ve read a lot about Soviet spaceflight so it’s weird that I’ve never heard of SSVP. 

Apparently there are other variations. Federatsya will be using an uprated SSVP with 30 t capacity; Zarya has some SSVP/APAS hybrid, Nauka will carry some freakish transformer that can be widened in-flight from 800 mm to 1200 mm; and TKS/Almaz used an in-house hydraulic hard seal system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...