Jump to content

procedural parts or in the style that we have right now?


procedural parts or regular parts(right now)?  

76 members have voted

  1. 1. do you want procedural parts or regular (right now)?

    • procedural
      44
    • regular (right now stock)
      32


Recommended Posts

  On 12/4/2019 at 6:45 AM, shdwlrd said:

@mcwaffles2003 you would have roughly about 100 parts less if there were procedural parts for your main craft. (Instead of 7 tanks for each ion cluster, there would be two.) Just out of curiosity, did you get it into orbit in one piece?

Expand  

v8z3bgb939x31.png

yup, only took 20 minutes :p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

They could still have base parts which you could change the fuel or size or texture or other properties, they needn’t be fully player generated parts. But whatever the case more customisation over stock KSP would be nice. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/30/2019 at 11:05 AM, Dale Christopher said:

They could still have base parts which you could change the fuel or size or texture or other properties, they needn’t be fully player generated parts. But whatever the case more customisation over stock KSP would be nice. 

Expand  

Stock Fuel Switching would be amazing; that alone could get me to pick it up xD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...