Jump to content

Ducted-Fan Performance


Recommended Posts

What have you been seeing for max sustained cruising speeds on your ducted-fan designs?  (the BG expansion robotics blades)

Granted, I can peak-out in the 290 range for short intervals... but for a sustained cruise I'm maybe seeing something around 275 m/s in the 1000-1500m altitude range?  (Kerbin atmosphere)

Have your observations been any different?

 

 

Edited by XLjedi
I mis-quoted turbo-fan when I meant ducted-fan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, XLjedi said:

What have you been seeing for max sustained cruising speeds on your turbo-fan designs?

Which turbofan engines are you talking about?

In a light plane with the panther afterburning turbofan I can supercruise (> mach one in dry mode) and easily manage more than mach 2.5 in wet mode.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I quoted the wrong name.  The new robotics parts... it's the "ducted fan" not the "turbo fan".

So disregard the two turbofan responses above (my fault), and I will restate the question with the correct name of the robotic fan part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, XLjedi said:

The new robotics parts... it's the "ducted fan" not the "turbo fan".

Kind of what I thought, but I couldn't resist a snarky comment. :cool:

I haven't used the ducted fans myself (yet?), but 250 m/s is more than my propeller planes manage. I haven't built a speed-optimized craft, but I wouldn't be too surprised if 270 m/s or so is a hard upper limit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, AHHans said:

Kind of what I thought, but I couldn't resist a snarky comment. :cool:

I haven't used the ducted fans myself (yet?), but 250 m/s is more than my propeller planes manage. I haven't built a speed-optimized craft, but I wouldn't be too surprised if 270 m/s or so is a hard upper limit.

I circumnavigated the globe (Kerbin) this weekend with an average sustained speed of 275 m/s and I was pretty happy with that.  It was almost exactly a 4 hour trip (4hrs and 5 mins, but I made a brief full-stop at Dessert Base, so a bit inside of 4hrs is probably what I would assume for a non-stop effort)  Average altitude was about 1500m and on a few occasions when I had climbed up to about 2500m and was coming back down to 1000m I managed to peak out above 290 m/s with a few reasonably long runs in the 280 m/s range.  ...but I 275 m/s (Mach 0.8) is kinda my expected benchmark now.

I know the same craft with a dual Juno jet setup topped out at 305m/s at an altitude of about 5000m... but the Junos have a hard time getting anywhere near 270 m/s in the 500-1500m low altitude range. 

The fuel economy of the ducted-fan was the remarkable thing.  I made the trip on a 270° heading (which forced a much longer night sequence) so I would say at least 75% of the flight was in complete darkness and I still had like 82% of my fuel reserves remaining when I touched down at the KSP.

I was going to do an "Electric-Jet" video on the setup but wanted to see what others may have seen in terms of their own ducted-fan design performance.  In a sprint, dual ducted-fans can beat dual junos to the island runway every single time.  They accelerate faster and hit a top speed on the island run inside of 3 minutes that the Junos can't match.

With dual Junos, I can make the trip to the Dessert Facility on maybe a bit under 50% of fuel...  So I think a round-trip is do-able with those engines provided I'm maxing out efficiency at about 5000-6000m altitude range and cruising speed in the 305 m/s range.  The ducted-fan makes the trip at an average speed of about 275 m/s and used less than 3% of available fuel reserves, with the ability to use zero fuel if the sun was shining the whole time. 

Both planes are using the same airframe shown here:

 

Edited by XLjedi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, XLjedi said:

So disregard the two turbofan responses above

<kidding>
Disregarding my answer, eh? And why did I read your question in the first place? Processed it? Tried to come up with an informative and helpful answer? Hmm? All for nothing? That's very, very naughty of you! ;) 
</kidding>

All good, no worries, see you in space :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...