[1.0.5] FASA 5.44

lordmuffin · December 26, 2014

Since the Gemini command pods are hinted to be of Earth origin, why not make it look like kerbals painted over the original capsule (the United States logo) with the Kerbal States thing?

raidernick · December 26, 2014

Since the Gemini command pods are hinted to be of Earth origin, why not make it look like kerbals painted over the original capsule (the United States logo) with the Kerbal States thing?

because that would be ugly? It's fine how it is.

ethan829 · December 26, 2014

Since the Gemini command pods are hinted to be of Earth origin, why not make it look like kerbals painted over the original capsule (the United States logo) with the Kerbal States thing?

It's a replica

keil_98 · December 27, 2014

thankz Frizzak for your wonderful work. it's awesome! .

just a little question... (due to my ignorance..) is the mercury unable to allow eva for kerbals? i have a stranded mercury on mun.. tried eva and the poor bob kerman just explodes all the times... (now planning a giant recovery mission to get all the capsule back to kerbin... :cool: )

frizzank · December 27, 2014

You have to upgrade the ability to EVA now in campaign mode. Also the hatch can not be blocked by anything.

New update with some fixes to the Apollo docking devices to make it easier to dock and less unpredictable.

Kerbal Stuff download

https://kerbalstuff.com/mod/27/FASA/download/5.10

5.10

Re-skinned the Apollo docking cones and made their collision work better for docking.

I also made it much easier to dock the Apollo LEM and CSM craft together,

Lowered the acquire force and torque for Apollo docking cones added some more bits to the cfg

Added a docking target to the texture of the LEM

Added visible lights to the LEM from the outside

Tweaked Gemini antenna, lowered weight adjusted packet size

Added PhysicsSignificance = 1 to landing gear, suppose to help collision with ground....

Fixed exploding Transtage CSM icon

removed the float air resource

Lowered the weight of Gemini landing legs and increased crash tolerance

Added mono propellent reaction wheels to the pods to compensate for the overcorrection of the pilots for RCS only systems

keil_98 · December 28, 2014

thanks!!!

frizzank · December 28, 2014

I updated the Media fire mirror Kerbal stuff seams to be having issues

http://www./download/o1b5dr739gcdfua/FASA5.10.zip

deepfield · December 28, 2014

Having some problems trying to figure out how to make theSA-206 for the first manned crew mission to Skylab. Do i just tear off the lander module from SA-204 and replace it with the Apollo CSM?

Edit:

Better idea oh whats happening. That gap between the fairing base and the CSM is what im talking about. Is there a way to move the CSM down or do I have to just leave the gap?

Edited December 28, 2014 by deepfield
Added picture

raidernick · December 28, 2014

Having some problems trying to figure out how to make theSA-206 for the first manned crew mission to Skylab. Do i just tear off the lander module from SA-204 and replace it with the Apollo CSM?
Edit:
Better idea oh whats happening. That gap between the fairing base and the CSM is what im talking about. Is there a way to move the CSM down or do I have to just leave the gap?
http://puu.sh/dN1Nc/0a6929cb26.png

You don't move it down, it is supposed to be supported on the fairing like in real life the gap is supposed to be there.

deepfield · December 28, 2014

You don't move it down, it is supposed to be supported on the fairing like in real life the gap is supposed to be there.

Ah I see! I could not for the life of me find a cross section of any Saturn launchers without the lander inside.

frizzank · December 29, 2014

Yea the Apollo CSM was supported by the fairings and the LEM just fit under it.

Raptor22 · December 30, 2014

Where'd you get the moon (or Mun) rover?

deepfield · December 30, 2014

Me again Have a little bug. Nothing game breaking but its there.

Deltac · December 30, 2014

Where'd you get the moon (or Mun) rover?

Who are you asking?

TheDamDog · December 30, 2014

Am I going to hell for this?

Whirligig Girl · December 30, 2014

Am I going to hell for this?
http://i.imgur.com/q8kggUG.jpg

Probably. One does not simple Soyuz an Atlas.

December 30, 2014

Am I going to hell for this?
http://i.imgur.com/q8kggUG.jpg

Nah. Build 'em how you want, fly 'em how you want. :cool:

frizzank · December 30, 2014

That's a whole lot of awesome...

TheDamDog · December 30, 2014

Gemini-Soyuz and Voskhod-Atlas...ah, if only real life was more like KSP.

I mean, with less death an explosions.

So like...meeting halfway, maybe.

Virtualgenius · December 31, 2014

It would be nice if all the space agencies worked to a common goal unfortunately we have governments which get in the way with politics and bureaucracy

Whirligig Girl · December 31, 2014

This desparately needs to be Realism Overhaul compatible. I have a science fair project that relies on this.

frizzank · January 1, 2015

This desparately needs to be Realism Overhaul compatible. I have a science fair project that relies on this.

It is, RO comes with FASA configs for module manager....

Im also finding that the Apollo parts are way too expensive in the new career mode. Im working on balancing the prices so it makes for a smoother transition to those parts in the tech tree.

Also I am editing the descriptions of the parts so the similar ones are grouped together in the parts list.

Pappystein · January 1, 2015

Im also finding that the Apollo parts are way too expensive in the new career mode. Im working on balancing the prices so it makes for a smoother transition to those parts in the tech tree.
Also I am editing the descriptions of the parts so the similar ones are grouped together in the parts list.

Two questions about this;

1) you stated you would like to make FASA a Standard so that the entire game can be run on it about a hundred posts back. Are you planning on creating your own Contracts so you can slow down development? For example: Currently I am getting Explore Duna missions well before any of the FASA landers are available (Either the Gemini or the Apollo landers.)

2) Any chance of a Gemini lander craft file? Every time I try to build a Titan IIIC for it I somehow screw it up. (Not enough Delta-V to get to the mun and then back seems to be the biggest issue.)

2.a) Are we going to see the Titan III/IV SRBs earlier in the progression then?

lextacy · January 2, 2015

Mr. FASA maker , happy new years! I found a few problems in your .90 update you need to be aware of. Actually this was present even back in .25.

1. Your ALSEP Scanner uses a duplicate science experiment . So you cant run all 3 and get 3 different experiments. Ive looked at your .cfg and found the error.

2. The LEM antennas fail to send science , its says no SPM present, I think that has a tie with Remote Tech ? Not sure. But nevertheless we cant do science on the LEM. Ive tried doing a MM to force the antennas to remote tech the science to the apollo CM with no avail. I prolly did it wrong, hopefully you can correct that since your better at this

This is used twice in both modules , the ASLEP device and ASLEP scanner


experimentID = ALSEPenvironmentScan

The missing experiment should be id = ALSEPsurfaceScan

Edited January 2, 2015 by lextacy

Mecripp · January 2, 2015

Mr. FASA maker , happy new years! I found a few problems in your .90 update you need to be aware of. Actually this was present even back in .25.
1. Your ALSEP Scanner uses a duplicate science experiment . So you cant run all 3 and get 3 different experiments. Ive looked at your .cfg and found the error.
2. The LEM antennas fail to send science , its says no SPM present, I think that has a tie with Remote Tech ? Not sure. But nevertheless we cant do science on the LEM. Ive tried doing a MM to force the antennas to remote tech the science to the apollo CM with no avail. I prolly did it wrong, hopefully you can correct that since your better at this
This is used twice in both modules , the ASLEP device and ASLEP scanner
experimentID = ALSEPenvironmentScan
The missing experiment should be id = ALSEPsurfaceScan

If you look in the RT folder you will see RemoteTech_FASA_Antennas.cfg

@PART[FASALM_Antenna]:FOR[RemoteTech] // LEM Antennas
{
    !MODULE[ModuleDataTransmitter] {}

    @MODULE[ModuleAnimateGeneric]
    {
        %allowManualControl = false
    }

    %MODULE[ModuleRTAntenna] {
        %Mode0OmniRange = 0
        %Mode1OmniRange = 1000000
        %EnergyCost = 0.01
        %MaxQ = 6000

        %DeployFxModules = 0

        %TRANSMITTER
        {
            %PacketInterval = 0.15
            %PacketSize = 3
            %PacketResourceCost = 1.0
        }
    }

    %MODULE[ModuleSPUPassive] {}
}

[1.0.5] FASA 5.44

Recommended Posts

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Join the conversation