Jump to content

Disturbances of Warp Drives


Recommended Posts

I have seen some news about development of warp drives and watched some videos about them. I see how they bend the space in front of and behind them and that made me think. Could this disturb the orbits of planets and celestial objects if it is used because the force I know of in the universe that can bend the fabric of space is gravity, or at least how i see it is demonstrated in videos I see when they show a fabric to represent space and gravity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Outside of the warp bubble, the space-time is flat. So there is no gravity generated by warp drive out there. There is also the interior region which is flat. The space ship is located in the interior and also does not experience any gravity. And then there is the boundary region in between. That's what actually makes the warp bubble a warp bubble, and space-time there is very much distorted. That does result in quite a bit of gravity acting on anything that passes through the warp bubble boundary. The boundary could extend quite a bit around the ship, in which case, you can run risk of damaging something or throwing it out of the orbit, but to shift something as big as a planet, or even a small moon, you need an enormous amount of energy. If we need that much to make the warp drive work, we might never get that far with it.

At any rate, any safe operation of the warp drive would be such where there are no objects within the bubble boundary. In which case, you do not run any risk of affecting orbits of planets or the like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So it just gives you a lift, and then leaves you in space, with only the speed you already had. As a result you have to use another, conventional engine to match your speed with your target. For example: Warp gets you from Earth's orbit into general vicinity of the Mars, and when field drops you still have only Earth's orbital speed which is higher than martian. So you have to use your NERVA engine to do correct insertion burn into martian orbit. Did i got it right? Still, it seems to save a lot of dV, not to mention time. You don't have to reach escape velocity, then do translation burn - you only have to brake yourself into orbit around Mars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know... I have no idea how a warp drive would affect orbital flight. It might be that you'd follow the same trajectory you would without it, only faster. And I don't even know how to do the math required to check that. I can do very basic math with the warp metric and I can do very simple math with the Schwartzschild metric, which would describe gravity around the star. But combining the two? That requires solving Einstein Equation for the combination, and while there is probably a good way to do this approximately, I wouldn't know where to start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alcubierre's warp drive would totally ignore orbital trajectories, it would move along a direct geodesic. Since it is making a pocket universe to cut off the effect of relativity, it would also cut off the effect of gravity.

Problems include:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In Star Trek lore, they always tried to avoid using warp drive while within a planetary system precisely because of the risk of disrupting a planet's orbit or damaging it directly.

Though more than once it was done anyway, once they were sure that they had safe distance to any major bodies so as to not damage them with spacial distortions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alcubierre's warp drive would totally ignore orbital trajectories, it would move along a direct geodesic. Since it is making a pocket universe to cut off the effect of relativity, it would also cut off the effect of gravity.

Problems include:

I wonder how momentum is conserved through the warp. It seems to me that even if you have this warp drive you would still need 30-50km/s of delta-v to match Hubble velocities with other star systems (unless you didn't mind hurtleing past them post-warp).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder how momentum is conserved through the warp. It seems to me that even if you have this warp drive you would still need 30-50km/s of delta-v to match Hubble velocities with other star systems (unless you didn't mind hurtleing past them post-warp).

As far as I know it is conserved. So yes, you will need an auxiliary propulsion system to match Hubble velocities with your destination.

In the old E.E. "Doc" Smith Lensman novels, this was called a ship's "intrinsic" velocity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder how momentum is conserved through the warp. It seems to me that even if you have this warp drive you would still need 30-50km/s of delta-v to match Hubble velocities with other star systems (unless you didn't mind hurtleing past them post-warp).

I'm not so sure about that, since the Hubble velocity is a property of the space-time and not of the object within, so I'd guess you'd move in comoving coordinates, which aren't affected by the expansion. Also the expansion of the universe doesn't affect gravitational bound objects (much), such like galaxies. The far greater source of differences in velocity would be plain gravity (e.g. Andromeda rushes with 300 km/s in our direction).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alcubierre's warp drive would totally ignore orbital trajectories, it would move along a direct geodesic. Since it is making a pocket universe to cut off the effect of relativity, it would also cut off the effect of gravity.

The ship in the bubble is in flat space-time. But the energy that generates warp bubble is not. The bubble would interact with other masses. It will most certainly not go in "direct geodesic," because there is no such thing. "Direct line" is a very relative concept in GR. It is all a matter of metric.

The other argument is from conservation of energy. If your ship gets off the orbit, where does the energy for it come from? Energy in the bubble does not change in the process.

creating the warp takes about 12 times as much energy as is contained in the entire universe

Rubbish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...