Jump to content

Don't Click This


NASI Director

Recommended Posts

  On 6/27/2016 at 2:32 AM, cubinator said:

Maybe we should revive that one too? :D 

Expand  

Too late someone already did. 

What we need here is a don't click tracker so that we can keep track of the don't click threads that we don't want to click versus the don't click threads that we want to click; thus create click parse thread that we can use as a don't click guide. 

Im told that if you use the same word, like click, more than seven times in a train of thought you can throughly confuse the reader so they understand nothing about the thought. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 6/28/2016 at 12:04 AM, cubinator said:

WHY is it impossible for you guys to keep at least two of these locked? I am fine with one of them, but the fact that there are three is a joke. :D 

Expand  

Fail, you did not state why you clicked, see first page for rules. 

I clicked to inform c about the rules and to fail him, it makes me feel all warm inside. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 6/28/2016 at 12:15 AM, PB666 said:

Fail, you did not state why you clicked, see first page for rules. 

I clicked to inform c about the rules and to fail him, it makes me feel all warm inside. 

Expand  

But you did not explain why you clicked on it the first time, therefore I clicked on the thread to attempt to correct the temporal paradox and save the universe, well, at least the excusiverse. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 6/28/2016 at 12:07 AM, PB666 said:

Too late someone already did. 

What we need here is a don't click tracker so that we can keep track of the don't click threads that we don't want to click versus the don't click threads that we want to click; thus create click parse thread that we can use as a don't click guide. 

Im told that if you use the same word, like click, more than seven times in a train of thought you can throughly confuse the reader so they understand nothing about the thought. 

Expand  

How about a counter that counts up 1 every server processor cycle where there is not a click?  That would literally count the number of times the thread was not clicked.

Edited by Mad Rocket Scientist
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 6/28/2016 at 12:37 AM, Mad Rocket Scientist said:

How about a counter that counts up 1 every server processor cycle where there is not a click?  That would literally count the number of times the thread was not clicked.

Expand  

Or a program that automatically renames the most active thread in Forums with a slightly mispelled 'Don't click' title and then randomly moves the thread randomly to another subforum, which after there more posts randomly moves to games with random moderator post and a random moderator reason. The for every random number of posts below 10 the thread locks, and after a random period under 24 hours it unlocks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...