Jump to content

Dihydrogen monoxide hoax (Why a water hoax?)


Designer225

Recommended Posts

Last winter, there was an article in some ukrainian newspaper which hysterically claimed that government uses highly dangerous extremely radioactive isotope with half-life period of several thousands of years (OH NOEZ!!!) as an ingredient for anti-ice chemical for streets. It was reposted at least once, by RussiaToday.

People are idiots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last winter, there was an article in some ukrainian newspaper which hysterically claimed that government uses highly dangerous extremely radioactive isotope with half-life period of several thousands of years (OH NOEZ!!!) as an ingredient for anti-ice chemical for streets. It was reposted at least once, by RussiaToday.

People are idiots.

Agreed. We are very dependent and that we must be watched at all time. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What we really need to ban is the substance: (2R,3S,4R,5R)-2,3,4,5,6-Pentahydroxyhexanal

It is commonly found in plants and is a significant factor in causing obesity, blindness and neuropathy, and has been reported to cause a "high" feeling before withdrawal symptoms including loss of energy and irritability.

Acute exposure can also lead to short-term gastrointestinal problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Congress would disagree (along with Obama possibly) when a new amendment would be proposed to repeal the First Amendment. (Possible outcome: Not passed by either House of the Congress, or if got through Congress... not getting a 3/4 state majority.)

That might be pulled to the next election year (2016), when Democrats would possibly nominate a female presidential candidate (If the candidate does become president, then his husband would become the First Gentleman.), then much would be decided.

Also, somewhat less recent events in some people having a petition to build a Death Star (looks like the one in Star Wars), but Obama does not support blowing up the planet.

The guy wanted to show the idiocy and gullibility of your average person, whether congress would go along or the president hardly matters in that (though I've a nagging suspicion that prior to the 2010 elections that killed the dem majority they just might have, of course that'd still not get it passed as a constitutional change requires ratification by the states which tend to be more conservative than their congressional representatives).

The main problem with Hillary as president is that she already served 2 terms, everyone knows she was the real president, Billy boy was just a figurehead :)

And that's another part of the constitution entirely, lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What we really need to ban is the substance: (2R,3S,4R,5R)-2,3,4,5,6-Pentahydroxyhexanal

It is commonly found in plants and is a significant factor in causing obesity, blindness and neuropathy, and has been reported to cause a "high" feeling before withdrawal symptoms including loss of energy and irritability.

Acute exposure can also lead to short-term gastrointestinal problems.

Remarkable. I have the same combination on my luggage. [/spaceballs]

With that said, given my lack of experience with chemistry I'm going to assume that that is sugar given the discription. Am I right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Realize that while most of us here are extremely gifted in the sciences, we're undoubtedly just as ignorant and foolish in other areas. The people who would vote to ban water because they're naive enough to think it's a dangerous chemical may very well think the exact same about most of us if we were discussing another topic.

...Who am I kidding? I can't play devils advocate for these people. They're denser than iridium. Ban water... :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is also that certain shady groups of people use scare tactics in order to push a certain political standpoint or to make money. the most obvious ones are the charity campaigns with all these sad images of dying kids / animals followed by instructions to make monthly payments toward the charity (And to push certain people over the line they also include a free plushy or something cute). Anybody with a sceptical mind knows that these images are deliberately chosen (or sometimes faked) and when crunching the numbers. Most of the cash flows into the wallets of the managers.

But there are also groups proclaiming that every day stuff is dangerous to use. From wireless internet to the so called E numbers, non bio-friendly grown food. And the weird part is that these groups can make people so scarred of certain stuff they stop seeing the impact it has on the world.

A funny example, a few weeks ago I was at a party and a somewhat leftist-hippie friend of mine brought a bottle of cheap whiskey. When searchign for the coke I could only found Diet coke. My friend refused to mix his whiskey with the diet coke because it contains Aspartame. A sugar substitute that has quite the fame on the internet.

I was baffled, he got so brainwashed by these groups claiming aspartame is killing people he completely forgot the WHISKEY part in the whiskey-coke drink. His mind rationalized the banning of Aspartame above alcohol.

The DHMO petition is a great trick to show how these groups work. Smart / sceptical people know how to interpret such a story. But most of the people in our civilised world rather know all the pokemon than the periodic table. And when asked to help ban a "bad something" they sure will sign.

Edited by hugix
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But there are also groups proclaiming that every day stuff is dangerous to use. From wireless internet to the so called E numbers, non bio-friendly grown food. And the weird part is that these groups can make people so scarred of certain stuff they stop seeing the impact it has on the world.

I was baffled, he got so brainwashed by these groups claiming aspartame is killing people he completely forgot the WHISKEY part in the whiskey-coke drink. His mind rationalized the banning of Aspartame above alcohol.

It's funny, the overwhelming majority of articles & websites I've seen about the "dangers" of GM/E numbers/vaccinations also have links to shops selling organic produce/homeopathy/conspiracy theory books. It's almost as if they have a vested interest in scaremongering & spreading misinformation...

Similar to (but less interesting) than your story, I noticed on my shampoo bottle it contained "Organic Tea Tree Oil"... and Methylchloroisothiazolinone. That's a fairly harsh synthetic fungicide. Again, perhaps missing the wood for the trees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...