Jump to content

[WIP] Bavarian Aerospace: Tubes! (update9|20|14)

onkelsiebdruck

By onkelsiebdruck
in KSP1 Mod Development

 Share

Recommended Posts

Justin Kerbice

Justin Kerbice

Posted
Posted
hmm am i the only one that noticed that the newer tubes are harder to use as parts for space stations while the older parts are easier?

What is your issue ?

I have some issue to connect properly two parts basically so this is what I do:

align the VAB view to make the node you want to connect to on le left or right side, the part vertical face should be straight, take your part, align it to make sure the node is pointing on the right direction, and now the node stack snapping should work as expected.

Really these parts need to be completed, they deserve it !

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Helix935

Helix935

Posted
Posted
An update after a long long time.

First I focus on the very old round tubes. And try a different technical approach on them, that might reduce kerbalpain.

And i have in the first post something different for you...

().()

maxresdefault.jpg

Yay your back, i love the emergency bubble :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Horus

Horus

Posted
Posted (edited)

The bubble pod is really sooooooo cute :)

However, there are some problems with it:

1. "Deploy RCS" is currently for aesthetic purpose only as it works in any state ))) In this case don't really get the purpose of engine(which is a MP based one).

2. Two almost similar options: "Control From Here" and "Control from Here". Why 2? :) Any difference?

3. Having RPM initializing error spawned into logs.

4. The CoM is somewhat shifted so the pod is not properly pointed to the ground when falling through atmosphere always trying to roll to a side.

Edited by Horus
upd
Link to comment
Share on other sites
onkelsiebdruck

onkelsiebdruck

Posted
  • Author
Posted
The bubble pod is really sooooooo cute :)

However, there are some problems with it:

1. "Deploy RCS" is currently for aesthetic purpose only as it works in any state ))) In this case don't really get the purpose of engine(which is a MP based one).

bound the animation to the RCS function instead of actiongroup....so if you hit r or activate it from iva, it should be fine.

purpose of main-engine-> de-orbiting in less than 5 minutes :D

. Two almost similar options: "Control From Here" and "Control from Here". Why 2? :) Any difference?
no difference in gameplay, same node

It´s a KSP issue, one entry for the vessel, one for the docking-port on the same part...doubt that i could remove one entry.

3. Having RPM initializing error spawned into logs.
yes , but it is nothing you should worry about it...not pretty...but for now we have to live with it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ionn

ionn

Posted
Posted

It´s a KSP issue, one entry for the vessel, one for the docking-port on the same part...doubt that i could remove one entry.

You could make the docking port/hatch a separate part from the pod so it requires being attached in the VAB. I'm not sure how that will affect your spaces file though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...