Ralathon Posted January 3, 2014 Share Posted January 3, 2014 I don't know if I'm doing something wrong here, but it looks like a pretty big dish(50.0Mm) is needed to communicate with KSC from GSO.EDIT: Fusebox is giving me accurate info in VAB. Are the RT antennas supposed to draw so much?This has more to do with RemoteTech than RSS. RemoteTech is balanced around the stock system so power requirements are too high and ranges are too short. An easy fix is to go to your install file and find the Remotetech_settings.cfg file. There you can just set the consumptionMultiplier to 0.1 to fix power and rangemultiplier to 10 to fix ranges. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dlrk Posted January 3, 2014 Share Posted January 3, 2014 I'll change that, thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dlrk Posted January 3, 2014 Share Posted January 3, 2014 Interesting problem now, the antenna is displaying properly and functioning properly, but in the VAB, Fusebox is displaying 10x the power consumption Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NathanKell Posted January 3, 2014 Author Share Posted January 3, 2014 Expected. Fusebox doesn't know that RT2 applies the consumption multiplier before drawing the resource; Fusebox just pulls the part's base EC cost.Also, note my post on previous page re: per-second and per-minute Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Razorcane Posted January 3, 2014 Share Posted January 3, 2014 Pst, Nathan, I got those pictures you requested. On the previous page, in case you didn't see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NathanKell Posted January 3, 2014 Author Share Posted January 3, 2014 OP updated with new screenies. Razorcane, saw it and thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Razorcane Posted January 3, 2014 Share Posted January 3, 2014 OP updated with new screenies. Razorcane, saw it and thanks!I hope it's alright, it showed off RasterPropMonitor more than RSS, but it had some nice shots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarStalkeR Posted January 3, 2014 Share Posted January 3, 2014 Hello NathanKell,It's quite awesome and epic mod. I want to know, does this version supports changing multiple MODULE and/or RESOURCE nodes within one configuration node?I will provide you example, so it will be easier for you to understand my question. For example "Engine X1000" in config file has MODULE for ModuleEngines, MODULE for ModuleResourceIntake and RESOURCE to store the intake. Question is: what I need to add to config file, in order just with one button to change two MODULEs and RESOURCE nodes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NathanKell Posted January 3, 2014 Author Share Posted January 3, 2014 WarStalkeR: Sorry, I think you may have posted in the wrong thread. This is the thread for Real Solar System; it changes planets and moons, etc. I think maybe you're thinking of Module Manager? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zander Posted January 4, 2014 Share Posted January 4, 2014 nathan can you elaborate more on the texture paging thing you said. I am very interested. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NathanKell Posted January 4, 2014 Author Share Posted January 4, 2014 Not much more than "it's planned" at this point: a system to get around KSP's texture size limit by splitting textures up into smaller parts and loading only what's needed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eadrom Posted January 5, 2014 Share Posted January 5, 2014 (edited) Just started playing around with this last night and this morning (thank you again NathanKell for helping me get it set up). I read somewhere that since RSS is modeled after our solar system, then real life dV maps should be a good guide for building missions in RSS. I found what looks like a pretty good real world dV map. Took me several tries to get to the mun, thinking "surely I have enough dV this time..." and ending up needing more dV. lol I've been lobbing up 10-16 ton station modules relatively easily, but it took me a couple hours to get a tiny 0.16 ton probe to the Mun. xDAnyways, hopefully this find helps fellow RSS'ers better plan their missions! If anyone has a better or more accurate dV map, I'd love to see it!20.41 km/s of dV to get to low Pluto orbit from surface of Earth. Has anyone flown any Pluto missions? These numbers look generally accurate? Edited January 5, 2014 by Eadrom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain_Party Posted January 6, 2014 Share Posted January 6, 2014 Has anyone seen this? Chaka Monkeys Exploration SystemsI think it'd be really cool, and I'd love to have a go at re-scaling it for RSS if someone would like to help... The engines are basically KW, and on the first page he says what scale their built in, should be relatively simple. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sax Man Aeronautics Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 Is there any config for RSS that can recreate the solar system, with PlanetFactory installed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metaphor Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 Is there any config for RSS that can recreate the solar system, with PlanetFactory installed?This is the one I'm using and this is what it looks like (although I've made some small changes since that album, like adding Joker and Serious as Eris and Sedna). Needs RealSolarSystem, PlanetFactory, VisualEnhancements(Clouds and City Lights), UniverseReplacer mods, but if you don't have one of them just don't extract the relevant directory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sax Man Aeronautics Posted January 9, 2014 Share Posted January 9, 2014 This is the one I'm using and this is what it looks like (although I've made some small changes since that album, like adding Joker and Serious as Eris and Sedna). Needs RealSolarSystem, PlanetFactory, VisualEnhancements(Clouds and City Lights), UniverseReplacer mods, but if you don't have one of them just don't extract the relevant directory.When I installed the RSS config, some clouds don't appear in the game. The places that have no clouds are: Kerbin, Eve, Jool, Sentar, Erin, Skelton, and Laythe, which is pretty much all atmoshperic bodies. Is there a solution to this? Reply ASAP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NathanKell Posted January 9, 2014 Author Share Posted January 9, 2014 Open BoulderCo/common.cfg, increase the distances inside CAMERA_SWAP_DISTANCES by a factor of ten (like Kerbin = 2000)Also, just as a general note, demanding things is not usually a good policy with mods. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agathorn Posted January 9, 2014 Share Posted January 9, 2014 Hey gang any ideas what I may be doing wrong? I have installed this mod, but i'm still getting the stock kerbal solar system.I mean, I see no special install instructions other than the standard, putting it in GameData so i'm unsure what I could possibly have done wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metaphor Posted January 9, 2014 Share Posted January 9, 2014 When I installed the RSS config, some clouds don't appear in the game. The places that have no clouds are: Kerbin, Eve, Jool, Sentar, Erin, Skelton, and Laythe, which is pretty much all atmoshperic bodies. Is there a solution to this? Reply ASAP.Hmm. Maybe the updates to the Cloud mod broke it. I don't have the newest one installed.Try doing this: in game when you open up the cloud mod window (alt+N), load saved configuration.If that doesn't work, try renaming userCloudLayers.cfg (in KSP/GameData/BoulderCo/Clouds) to cloudLayers.cfgIf that doesn't work either, something has changed in the latest version and I'll work on updating it. In the meantime you should be able to use the default clouds by deleting the userCloudLayers.cfg file, or redownloading the Visual Enhancements mod.Oh yeah, and also do what NathanKell said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agathorn Posted January 9, 2014 Share Posted January 9, 2014 Hey gang any ideas what I may be doing wrong? I have installed this mod, but i'm still getting the stock kerbal solar system.I mean, I see no special install instructions other than the standard, putting it in GameData so i'm unsure what I could possibly have done wrong.Actually I think it is working. I just realized that the layout of all the celestial bodies HAS changed to what looks like the real solar system. I had assumed this mod would also change the names to the real names, and change at least Kerbal's texture to look like Earth, so when I saw the Kerbal names, and the normal Kerbal planet, I assumed it was not working. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NathanKell Posted January 9, 2014 Author Share Posted January 9, 2014 Alas not yet. Both obviously are planned though.Also, changing body names can break other mods, so I've been putting it off a bit... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agathorn Posted January 9, 2014 Share Posted January 9, 2014 Alas not yet. Both obviously are planned though.Also, changing body names can break other mods, so I've been putting it off a bit...Fair enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sax Man Aeronautics Posted January 9, 2014 Share Posted January 9, 2014 (edited) Open BoulderCo/common.cfg, increase the distances inside CAMERA_SWAP_DISTANCES by a factor of ten (like Kerbin = 2000)Also, just as a general note, demanding things is not usually a good policy with mods. Sorry about my tone, I was just a bit frustrated about the clouds not appearing at first. Thank you for the fixes, as they do work!EDIT: Second time I launched KSP, it didn't work at all anymore. Edited January 10, 2014 by Sax Man Aeronautics Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UNSA Posted January 10, 2014 Share Posted January 10, 2014 This mod is outstanding, but I am curious if there any plans for a "Lite" version that remains kerbal scaled, with just bodies and orbits rearranged? I love this mod, but the planet scales make it all but unworkable with some of my favorite mods without significant reconfigs. I don't mean to sound ungrateful, but I like to play the game more than play with the .cfg files. PS - Also...any idea if there is a mod out there to replace the kerbals themselves with human modeled astronauts? or at the very least, scale down their massive noggins? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starwaster Posted January 10, 2014 Share Posted January 10, 2014 This mod is outstanding, but I am curious if there any plans for a "Lite" version that remains kerbal scaled, with just bodies and orbits rearranged? I love this mod, but the planet scales make it all but unworkable with some of my favorite mods without significant reconfigs. I don't mean to sound ungrateful, but I like to play the game more than play with the .cfg files. PS - Also...any idea if there is a mod out there to replace the kerbals themselves with human modeled astronauts? or at the very least, scale down their massive noggins?To each their own, but scaled up Kerbals / scaled down Kerbal craniums is where I draw the line. But like I've said, who am I to tell other people how to play. I'm just sayin..... nope. Nope nope nope NOPE! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts