Jump to content

Least oxidizer to orbit


Recommended Posts

I present unto you

VRkwzfE.png

The Least oxidizer to orbit challenge

The goal

The goal of this challenge it to get at least to the LKO using as little oxidizer as possible while utilizing conventional propulsion.

Rules

1) No SRBs, xenon or monopropellant including eva allowed

2) No mods except utility (e.g. MJ) or structural parts

3) Provide screenshot from before launch (not necessary with SSTOs if you provide mission results screen but still preferred)

4) Infinigliders are allowed but will have separate leaderboards

5) The final, stable orbit has to be around Kerbin but you are allowed to leave its SOI momentarily (e.g. use the Mun)

Scoring

Score is calculated by oxidizer spent including decoupled stages obviously.

In case KSP starts to show decimals it is rounded mathematically.

Infinigliders, manned and unmanned crafts will all have their own separate leaderboards.

Ranks by oxidizer expended

0 : "I bend the nature to my will"

1 : "There can be only one!"

2 : "One giant leap and one small step"

3 : "Threedom!"

4 : "Poker"

5 : "High five"

6 : "Number of the beast"

7 : "Lucky"

8 : "Break shot"

9 : "Pluto"

10-19 : "So near and yet so far"

20-30 : "Not even close"

Special achievements

Use no engines at all : "The force is with me!"

Get single digit rank with craft heavier than 10 tons : "Mass Turbation"

Leaderboards

Manned

1) Rhomphaia - 0

2) Kasuha - 0

3) tavert - 0.12

4) cyberklad - 2.17, "Mass Turbation" award

5) Richy teh space man - 9

Unanned

Edited by theend3r
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a FAR SSTO that I normally give 44 oxidizer to, but I can get it to orbit on like 15.

Well, technically, my favorite little 3-tonne FAR jet gets to "orbit" with a periapsis of up to 53 km and an apoapsis up to about 120.

But if I used a Kerbal jetpack, even just a tank or two, I could get it to LKO with ZERO oxidizer. (which apparently doesn't count)

Edited by Pds314
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hoorah! I'm messing about with minimalist designs. LV-0-75 (so named because it puts 0 payload into a 75km orbit) is 1.72t on the pad, with 4.9 oxidiser, of which 1.2 is left after circularisation. Pics to follow when I get an account somewhere I can post them ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

KSP.jpg

Managed to get into a 133/100km orbit with a starting weight of around 27T Got up to height with jets only and then circulized as much as possible with rcs, 0 oxidizer used. All the rocket fuel left to spend for the two nervas on the ship.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This was several versions ago, 1.26 units of oxidizer unmanned SSTO:

Javascript is disabled. View full album

Or sort-of manned, 0.12 units of oxidizer (full album at http://imgur.com/a/2DAhq - note I had to drain oxidizer from the jet stage on the launch pad, which these days you'd do with tweakables):

QZ67Dfc.jpg

YgYjKGR.png

Edited by tavert
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://s24.postimg.org/byx879yx1/KSP.jpg

Managed to get into a 133/100km orbit with a starting weight of around 27T Got up to height with jets only and then circulized as much as possible with rcs, 0 oxidizer used. All the rocket fuel left to spend for the two nervas on the ship.

Sorry to burst your bubble, but monopropellant isn't allowed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Managed to get into a 133/100km orbit with a starting weight of around 27T Got up to height with jets only and then circulized as much as possible with rcs, 0 oxidizer used. All the rocket fuel left to spend for the two nervas on the ship.
1) No SRBs, xenon or monopropellant including eva allowed

Using monoprop isn't allowed, that'd be too easy. There were even pure RCS rockets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is changing orbital parameters by pumping fuel around the ship ok or is it considered cheating?

Edit: what about circularizing by decoupling, if I use single decoupler?

All allowed. Those are what I'd actually like to see the most :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Richy teh space man - basically, the radial air intakes can store much more air than the other intakes - and when an intake is closed, it does not lose air :) - so he simply had to bring that air to it's apoapsis and circularize by using is turbojet engine :) (which is still hard to do right :P the engine will drink up the last remnant of air in the intakes like no tomorrow :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Richy teh space man - basically, the radial air intakes can store much more air than the other intakes - and when an intake is closed, it does not lose air :) - so he simply had to bring that air to it's apoapsis and circularize by using is turbojet engine :) (which is still hard to do right :P the engine will drink up the last remnant of air in the intakes like no tomorrow :P

Ahh I see thanks. I didn't know you could do that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, I tried some original approach. Nothing I would even remotely consider cheating, pure conventional propulsion. So I hope it counts.

Used oxidizer: 0.00

It does and it's really original :D

Great work.

Edited by theend3r
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...