Jump to content

Challenged! The Arkingthaad Nadir.


Whackjob

Recommended Posts

Another test.

You can see the absurd minimalism of this setup. And it flies fine. I doubt I can go that light with the trusswork once I'm two VABs high, but... eh. We'll see.

Going to try to come up with a functional angled brace for the inner superstructure.

Two pages late, but I have an answer. Pythagorean triangles. A gap between the inner and outer towers of 4 trusses will need 3 trusses worth of vertical space, and use 5 trusses of building material.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two pages late, but I have an answer. Pythagorean triangles. A gap between the inner and outer towers of 4 trusses will need 3 trusses worth of vertical space, and use 5 trusses of building material.

Problem with that though, is that in the horizontal scheme of the hex faced stack, the radius of the large tanks also factor in. I can't get that same rotation in the vertical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Problem with that though, is that in the horizontal scheme of the hex faced stack, the radius of the large tanks also factor in. I can't get that same rotation in the vertical.

It shouldnt matter, if you apply the pythagorean angles ONLY for vertical cross bracing. (horizontally, you already have triangle bracing with your main supports)

O===O (large tank separated by 3 struts as seen from above)

||===|| As seen from side, separeted by 2 sets of 5 struts.

||\\ .//||

|| \\// ||

|| //\\ ||

||// .\\||

||===||

Edited by Rakaydos
Link to comment
Share on other sites

X shaped bracing isn't new to me. I know what you mean, but you're not factoring in how those X shaped truss combos hook in to the side tanks. Horizontally, they attach to the face, and the distance means even the ones that aren't technically connecting touch and I can fish in a strut to bind them. The vertical X doesn't sit flush. Or anywhere near it. I've done about fifteen permutations and none mesh good with the horizontal trussing.

So I'm just building without it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I'm going to build a one column prototype and land it on the Mun. Just so I can see what "shakes out" during the trial run. I've since put her together.

Meet the arse end of the Arkingthaad Nadir Lite:

hCaGyLy.png

I doubt it has enough mmmf to get into orbit, much less the Mun, but, that's what boosters are for. We'll see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your rocket building skills makes all my rockets look like this:

;.;

That's the better way to go. Small and efficient. Your average KSP player succeeds way more than I ever could.

tHSE3xD.png

Liftoff achieved on the Arkingthaad Nadir Lite. Failed at about 1,500 feet, but that's fine. I now know how much engine I need. Tried to use Engineer mod so it would calculate my delta-V and TWR.

... it flat out refused.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...