Jump to content

What would YOU want powering YOUR rocket?


KASASpace

Recommended Posts

Nuclear Lightbulb engines.

This, honestly. It's the NERVA project taken to it's logical conclusion, the highest efficiency nuclear thermal rocket without radioactive exhaust. It's a theory at this point, but not because it's impossible to build. Much rather, it's pointless to build because no government would commit to legalizing it. If that was not a hindrance, we'd have this flying already today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the moon or below, I would want either a chemical or nuclear propulsion system. For the solar system, perhaps a torch-ship of some kind or a slower-than-light Alcubierre drive. Anywhere further would probably require an advanced K-Drive, a faster-than-light Alcubierre drive, or maybe something with teleportation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

*sitting on Santa Claus's lap*

I want a rotating core nuclear thermal rocket, 3800 C core temps and specific impulses over 1000 on LH2, thrust to weight ratio of 30. Plus a Helium/Xenon Closed Brayton cycle power conversion system.

Oh and I also want a dense plasma focus fusion engine capable of fusing protons and boron aneutronically and a specific impulse in excess of 100,000.

*Santa Claus looks confused*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well what I would love is a much better ion engine* because it's isp is very high and it's delta V is in massive amounts. If somehow we could make a more efficient ion engine, or one with better thrust, i would much rather use that but since we don't have those, it would probably be NERVA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Orion is still my favorite because a) we could build one right now if we wanted, and B) I can't think of anything more badass than riding nuclear explosions into orbit. :D

Hell yeah!

And the fact idea offends people too, gives it even greater appeal :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rockets rely on heat right? So what about a thermite rocket?

No they are not - they rely on expansion of reaction mass that accelerates said mass through the nozzle. How exactly this expansion is achieved is immaterial (for example Soyuz DM RCS system uses hydrogen peroxide decomposed over catalyst with no heat involved).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A *Quantum Jet*. A very strong electric field separates quantum foam particle-antiparticle pairs, and another electric field accelerates them and uses them as reaction mass. Some of the energy used to separate the pairs is recovered when they annihilate. Not truly reactionless, but doesn't need to carry its reaction mass around.

Edited by TheBeardyMan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was thinking of a "miniature" Orion drive. Orion drives need to be huge because the minimum fission bomb size is constrained to critical mass of the nuclear fuel in each bomb.

What about using laser initiated fusion bombs of much smaller size. Sure we don't have the lasers capable of doing this now, but if we're talking Alcubierre drives...why not?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I loved the idea of Orion drive when I was little. Now that I've read more about it though it seems pretty dangerous. I mean, thousands of little bombs exploding behind you to propel forward... yeah..

A chem rocket is basicaly a bomb going of behind you.

Orions just bigger :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...