What level of terrain scatter is "canon"

[r4pt0r]

I was wondering what level of terrain scatter is the actual "canon" level?

for example is duna a red sandy desert with a few sparse rocks? or is it a rocky wasteland of stone and some red soil?

WHAT IS THE TRUTH?

and what scatter level do you play with?

[Superfluous J]

Considering it's off by default and marked "experimental," I'd say 0% is as close to "canon" as you can get by any definition.

I play at 100%.

[CalculusWarrior]

I play at 100% also; I love seeing the rocks, trees, and sometimes cacti as I'm roving around Kerbin and other worlds.

[vexx32]

There is no truth. The truth is for you to create.

[Javster]

There is no truth. The truth is for you to create.

I guess that's why they call you "Philosophical Moderator"

[Epthelyn]

The truth is the rocks and trees are all lies.

All of them.

You can pass straight through them with any vehicle and quite a few of them exist several metres above the surface of their respective planet or moon.

[Claw]

I like to play with it on, but my game seems to crash more. So off it remains...

[Geschosskopf]

A caveat about scatter density.....

Just be careful using it on Pol (aka Place Of Lag). A scatter setting that looks cool and causes no trouble at all anywhere else in the universe will suddenly bring your computer to its knees as soon as the scatter comes into view when landing on Pol. On my machine at least, Pol is only playable if I reduced scatter down to about 25% of what I normally use.

Note, however, that I haven't been to Pol yet in 0.23.5 to see if the performance improvements have changed this. So it could be this warning is no longer valid. YMMV.

[SirusKing]

It would be awesome if the scatter was solid